My experience with Hackintosh

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
I had seen a few threads here about installing OS X on PC hardware, so I decided to look into it. Neither thread has been locked and I PM'd the mods and they don't seem to mind, so here we go!


Background:
I love computers, projects, and tinkering in general and this looked like a fun challenge. Before you go off about yay/nay on Hackintosh, (1) I own many computers, both PC and Mac, from a G4 Cube to an Intel MacBook and (2) I purchased a full retail copy of Leopard for this project. This purpose of this project was not for resale and was only for personal use. Anyway, I've been running a highly modified Mac Mini as my primary desktop for quite some time and have thoroughly enjoyed it. I sold that awhile back but kept my home/work Mac Mini (which also has been beefed up a bit) because I love the small, quiet design.

However, I ran into a performance problem: I needed to run multiple VMs plus some hardcore Mac software (video, CG, etc.). Since my Core Duo Mac Mini was limited, that meant either upgrading the processor (up to $700 for the 2.33ghz Merom dual-core) or getting a 2ghz Core 2 Duo Mini so that I could take advantage of the unofficial 3gb ram cap. However, that still wasn't enough ram, so I looked into the Mac Pros. Wow - they started at $2,500 and quickly jumped up to over $5,000 when I started adding upgrades to the ram, hard drives, etc. That was way, way out of my budget. I also looked at iMacs, but I don't really care for them - I already have a nice 24" Dell HC LCD monitor anyway.

Enter the Hackintosh. The idea of running OS X on homebuilt PC hardware thrilled me...I could custom-configure my own hardware without having to get Chinese adapters for the SATA and IDE ports on the Mini, do funky power rigging, or spend money on expensive laptop-sized upgrades. But how well would it really work? After doing some extensive research, I discovered that if you choose highly-compatible parts, you could end up with an inexpensive yet extremely stable and powerful machine. (Note: only downside is no Boot Camp, but you can always dual boot!)


Resources:
The two places to go for information are the InsanelyMac forums and the OSx86 Project Wiki. You will also need to do a lot of googling to find compatible parts and information in general.

There are two primary compatibility issues with the Hackintosh system: the motherboard and the video card. There are only a handful of each that are more or less 100% compatible and that have been tested extensively by the Hackintosh community, so you need to be extremely careful about plopping down money for parts before doing the proper research. If you get the right parts, however, your machine can be as stable as a "real" Mac.


Choosing my Parts:
I just sold my 15" MacBook Pro, so I gave myself a budget of $1,500 for this project. If it didn't work out, I would at least have an extremely powerful Windows/Linux machine. If it did work out, then I'd have my dream - a Mac Pro "Lite". $2500 is out of the question for a computer for my budget, and adding up the parts I really wanted ($5115) was astronomical. So of course I set out with the goal of building the $5115 configuration within my budget :D

After doing a fair amount of research, I settled on the Intel Bad Axe 2 motherboard. It is a slightly older design, but extremely stable. The only downside of the board under Hackintosh is that it does not support Mic Input, which is fine because I have a USB microphone (compatible USB sound cards are available for like $6 on ebay). Actually before I go on, here is the Mac Pro I spec'd out at Apple:

Mac Pro: $5115
-Two 2.0Ghz Dual-Core Intel Xeons (drops the $2,500 initial price by $299)
-8GB (4 x 2GB) Memory
-(3) 500gb 7200rpm SATA hard drives
-256mb 7300GT video card
-16x SuperDrive
-Bluetooth

Here are the parts I got:

Hack Pro: $1301.65
-2.4ghz Quad-Core Q6600 processor (~equivalent to dual 2ghz dual-core Xeons)
-8GB (4 x 2GB) Memroy
-(3) 500gb 7200rpm SATA hard drives
-256mb 7300GT video card
-20x DVD burner with Lightscribe
-Bluetooth
-[Intel Bad Axe 2 motherboard, Cooler Master 690 case, 520w Corsair modular PSU)

Starting out, that's a a savings of $3813.35. Not bad at all! Now for installation...


Software Installation:

The basic idea behind Hackintosh right now goes like this:

1. Format using a boot disc
2. Install Leopard using a patched disc
3. Copy over an EFI emulator and some other files from a USB stick
4. Install my Sound Card driver
5. Download 10.5.1 updates like normal :)

I won't go into much detail here; if you want to read up on the full install process click here. As long as you've chosen compatible hardware and have done your prep work with the software ahead of time, the installation is very easy. It takes about 1.5 hours, mostly due to the fact that it takes like 20 minutes to boot up the patched discs. I should note that I do not condone or encourage illegally downloading Leopard...I used a full retail Leopard DVD for my installation. The additional benefit is that I know my Leopard installation is clean of any spyware-type stuff that might come from Internet downloads.

The installation is fairly painless, although a bit tedious, following the guide linked above. There are newer and "better" guides and software available out there, but EFI 5.2 is very stable and works great. If you need GTP/GUID partitioning, then you will want to go with a newer version such as EFI 8. You need a few discs and a thumb drive to get everything up and running, as well as a Mac running Tiger to build the patched Leopard DVD.

So how does it run? In a nutshell, ridiculously awesome. On Xbench your typical Mac Pro scores about 155; my Hack Pro scored 174. Just for kicks, I overclocked it to 3.0ghz and got an Xbench score of 200 (3ghz, by the way, is a $1,000 option from Apple, so we're up to $4,800 in savings haha). I've had it up for about a week and half and it has proved far more stable than any of my windows machines. I can run two XP VMs in Fusion with dual-cores and 2 gigs of ram each without any slowdown in OS X. Most apps open in 1 bounce, the larger ones in 2. Time Machine works great, Core Image and Quartz Extreme are fantastic, and overall it's an awesome experience. I won't need another computer for like 10 years! :laugh:


Final Notes:
With Hackintosh, you can finally fill in the gap in Apple's product line - the Mac Pro Lite. In fact, you can build a Quad-Core machine with 4 gigs of ram for $700 plus the cost of whatever hard drives you want ($170 BA2 board @ ZZF, $280 Q6600 @ Newegg, Rosewill case/psu $27 @ Newegg, 7300GT $60 @ Tiger Direct, $38 DVD burner @ Newegg, 2x2GB RAM $100 @ Newegg, + shipping ~ $700). That puts it in Mac Mini territory!

I have tested a 7900GT successfully and I'm currently running a 320mb XFX 8800 GTS I got used off this forum. All the cards (7300GT, 7900GT, 8800GTS) have worked great. I can also dual-boot into Vista to play games.

A note on PC EFI: PC EFI emulates EFI (like a newer BIOS, used on Macs) and allows you to run a "vanilla" unmodified kernel. Your computer shows up as a Mac Pro and allows you to download updates like normal from Apple Updates. 10.5.1 works, but I can't say what the future holds other than I'm sure the hackers will be on it if Apple breaks anything. Anyway, aside from hardware, this Hackintosh *is* a Mac Pro for all intents and purposes - even Apple thinks it is! Very clever! There has been talk of Apple doing a general release of OS X for the x86 market, but honestly I don't think that has a big chance of happening - OS X is stable because Apple produces all of their own hardware, so they don't have to support everything under the sun which can lead to unstability. There is also a rumor that Apple is releasing a more powerful Mac Mini come January/February, or possible a mid-range "Cube 2", so I am anxious to see that as well.

I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have.

 

UlricT

Golden Member
Jul 21, 2002
1,966
0
0
How do you dual boot without boot camp? I thought XP/Vista had issues with EFI?
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Great post!

I always wanted to read about someone making a "Mac Pro Lite". I wouldn't mind another mac in my house but I want a headless unit I can expand, not that damn mini and not an over priced Pro.

 

Kmax82

Diamond Member
Feb 23, 2002
3,008
0
0
www.kennonbickhart.com
Yea, I own an iMac, but I would love for something in between that and the Mac Pro. You wrote a great article, and hopefully one day I can take the same plunge that you did. :)
 

AmigaMan

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,644
1
0
That's pretty sweet, although I doubt my manager at work here would approve if I wanted to try it on my desktop. I guess I'll have to be content with the MacBook Pro they gave me :(
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Yeah, I wouldn't mind having one of those myself. That seems to be one of two gaping holes in Apple's offerings. The first is the one you mention - a mac pro lite. An inexpensive headless unit that is user-upgradable without too much trouble. This used to be filled by the PowerMac single processor unit or the cube. Both you could upgrade easily and could AFFORD. Imacs are nice for the price, but I'd rather be able to tinker every now and then. The second is a true low-cost portable or headless unit. The mini comes close, but we need something that is more modifiable. Something that runs a minimal osx version like the EeePC as a cheap portable or a mini-itx tower that uses desktop parts instead of the smaller laptop parts as the mini does. It can be done.

Nice job there!
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: UlricT
How do you dual boot without boot camp? I thought XP/Vista had issues with EFI?

There are a couple ways of doing. One way is to use a bootloader; you can either use Vista's (chain0 method), Grub, or EasyBCD. EasyBCD is probably the simplest method of multi-booting since it's mostly just a point-and-click application. One thing I do not know, but will test in the future, is whether Parallels can read a non-Boot Camp partition running Windows. Paragon makes as NTFS driver, as does MacFUSE, so it'd be interesting to see if we could make that happen. The other way is simply to put Vista on a separate hard drive, then use the BIOS to select which drive to boot from. It takes an extra 20 seconds, but no headaches.

I'll put in a note about backup as well. SuperDuper currently isn't Leopard-ready, but CarbonCopyCloner is. You can back up to file or clone disk-to-disk using CCC. I've also heard of good results using Acronis TrueImage and I'll probably give the BartPE/DriveImageXML combo a shot one of these days. Also Time Machine works just fine...I have a 500-gig internal backup drive chugging away for that very purpose. Man I love Hackintosh! :D
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Great post!

I always wanted to read about someone making a "Mac Pro Lite". I wouldn't mind another mac in my house but I want a headless unit I can expand, not that damn mini and not an over priced Pro.

Yeah, it's a niche that Apple seems to have been avoiding because they don't really like end-users being able to upgrade their own machines. Hopefully that will change in the future. Again I've heard rumors of a "Cube 2"...anything would be better than nothing!
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: AmigaMan
That's pretty sweet, although I doubt my manager at work here would approve if I wanted to try it on my desktop. I guess I'll have to be content with the MacBook Pro they gave me :(

Well Apple's EULA says you can only install it on Apple-branded hardware...so slap one of those Apple stickers they give you when you buy Mac stuff on the side ;)
 

KeithP

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2000
5,664
201
106
Nice thread. Thanks for taking the time/expense to do this. That being said...

Lets be serious for a moment.. would anyone it their right mind pay Apple prices for the RAM and HDs as you have indicated? Especially if you are talking about someone that would build a Hacintosh?

MacPro 2.66: $2,499
4x2GB RAM: $579.99 (from macsales.com)
3x500GB HD: $344.97 (from macsales.com)
Total: $3,423.96

Granted, that is still A LOT more than what you spent but it is far more realistic comparison.

-KeithP

-Keith

 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Yeah, I wouldn't mind having one of those myself. That seems to be one of two gaping holes in Apple's offerings. The first is the one you mention - a mac pro lite. An inexpensive headless unit that is user-upgradable without too much trouble. This used to be filled by the PowerMac single processor unit or the cube. Both you could upgrade easily and could AFFORD. Imacs are nice for the price, but I'd rather be able to tinker every now and then. The second is a true low-cost portable or headless unit. The mini comes close, but we need something that is more modifiable. Something that runs a minimal osx version like the EeePC as a cheap portable or a mini-itx tower that uses desktop parts instead of the smaller laptop parts as the mini does. It can be done.

Nice job there!

Oh I completely agree. The first month the 13" MacBook came out, I ran out and got one thinking it was my dream machine, only to be disappointed by the thickness and weight. It's no ultraportable...in fact, the 15" feels lighter and is a tad thinner, making it feel more portable than the 13"! It looks like Apple has 13" LEDs on the way, which means that they will probably release them Jan/Feb (I'd imagine January because that's when all the big announcements are). Whether or not that's a 13" MacBook Pro or just an upgrade to the 13" MacBook, I don't know. Jobs said that all their displays would be LED by the end of 2008, so it could just be a minor upgrade. However I'm sure they could shave off a little size or even weight perhaps...with the new Santa Rosa chipset and the slight bump to the video card (GMA950->X3100) I might consider getting one. Until then, my wife has a 13" white MacBook, so I just use hers if I need computing on the go.

Everyone I know who has a 12" iBook or PowerBook LOVES their machine, I mean absolutely LOVES their machine. I too would love an ultraportable...something really easy to carry, just toss in my bag and go...that would be ideal. I bet Apple could sell tons of these, especially if they priced them at $1,499 to start out with. I would really like to see a Cube 2 or some kind of Mac Pro lightweight-tower come out as well. Apple has great styling...I actually just got a G4 Cube again off a forum member here and didn't realize how much I missed my own one hehe.

Oh yeah, the got Leopard running on an EEE PC ;)
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: randomlinh
that whole not being able to update in the future is what bugs me... but damn, this sounds good.

Well we don't really know that yet. It has an unmodified kernal, so Apple recognizes it as a Mac Pro and allows it to update. As far as Apple knows, it IS a Mac Pro. The 10.5.1 update download just fine. Even if future updates don't work out of the box, hackers will find a way around it - just look at the iPhone updates - within a few days (or hours, even) the latest update is cracked and ready for hacking and loading your own apps up with.

Another rationalization is what are you really going to upgrade for? Not that upgrades aren't good, but I don't use my Mac for gaming (at least the OS X side of things) and all the apps I've used for the past 5 years run fine on 10.5.1...Photoshop, Illustrator, Painter, Cinema4D, Final Cut, Office, Firefox, etc.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: KeithP
Nice thread. Thanks for taking the time/expense to do this. That being said...

Lets be serious for a moment.. would anyone it their right mind pay Apple prices for the RAM and HDs as you have indicated? Especially if you are talking about someone that would build a Hacintosh?

MacPro 2.66: $2,499
4x2GB RAM: $579.99 (from macsales.com)
3x500GB HD: $344.97 (from macsales.com)
Total: $3,423.96

Granted, that is still A LOT more than what you spent but it is far more realistic comparison.

-KeithP

-Keith

Yup, that's still over double what the fully-loaded Hackintosh cost. However, I should point out that many Mac users I know DO in fact pay full price for Apple hardware, simply because Apple offers them the experience and seamlessness of never having to use a screwdriver and open up their computer. It's unfortunate, but it's true. Of course, I upgrade all of my non-techie friend's Macs in exchange for dinner, so that doesn't really count towards all Mac users I know ;)
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Yeah, I wouldn't mind having one of those myself. That seems to be one of two gaping holes in Apple's offerings. The first is the one you mention - a mac pro lite. An inexpensive headless unit that is user-upgradable without too much trouble. This used to be filled by the PowerMac single processor unit or the cube. Both you could upgrade easily and could AFFORD. Imacs are nice for the price, but I'd rather be able to tinker every now and then. The second is a true low-cost portable or headless unit. The mini comes close, but we need something that is more modifiable. Something that runs a minimal osx version like the EeePC as a cheap portable or a mini-itx tower that uses desktop parts instead of the smaller laptop parts as the mini does. It can be done.

Nice job there!

Oh I completely agree. The first month the 13" MacBook came out, I ran out and got one thinking it was my dream machine, only to be disappointed by the thickness and weight. It's no ultraportable...in fact, the 15" feels lighter and is a tad thinner, making it feel more portable than the 13"! It looks like Apple has 13" LEDs on the way, which means that they will probably release them Jan/Feb (I'd imagine January because that's when all the big announcements are). Whether or not that's a 13" MacBook Pro or just an upgrade to the 13" MacBook, I don't know. Jobs said that all their displays would be LED by the end of 2008, so it could just be a minor upgrade. However I'm sure they could shave off a little size or even weight perhaps...with the new Santa Rosa chipset and the slight bump to the video card (GMA950->X3100) I might consider getting one. Until then, my wife has a 13" white MacBook, so I just use hers if I need computing on the go.

Everyone I know who has a 12" iBook or PowerBook LOVES their machine, I mean absolutely LOVES their machine. I too would love an ultraportable...something really easy to carry, just toss in my bag and go...that would be ideal. I bet Apple could sell tons of these, especially if they priced them at $1,499 to start out with. I would really like to see a Cube 2 or some kind of Mac Pro lightweight-tower come out as well. Apple has great styling...I actually just got a G4 Cube again off a forum member here and didn't realize how much I missed my own one hehe.

Oh yeah, the got Leopard running on an EEE PC ;)

Wow. That is awesome. If only Apple would follow suit. That is the ultimate in ultraportable laptops. I can see something along those lines being the new iBook, especially considering its size.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: MovingTarget

Wow. That is awesome. If only Apple would follow suit. That is the ultimate in ultraportable laptops. I can see something along those lines being the new iBook, especially considering its size.

Yeah pretty crazy! Leopard probably doesn't run too well on a 900mhz machine, but it DOES run. You can install Hackintosh on laptops as well, but there are a few major flaws, the big one being ACPI/Power Management - hardly any laptops even let you see the battery status under Leopard or mess with power settings because of this issue. There are only like one or two laptops that I've seen that fully support Leopard, and for some of them it's like, why not just put that money into a real Mac laptop? There is a guy who has had success with his T61; Thinkpads are the ideal laptop for Mac in my book - rugged, sturdy, lasts forever. Not the prettiest, but much more durable. I won't use a Mac laptop without some kind of plastic protection case on it at all times because they're so "fragile".
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
For people looking for a powerful budget build, here is a great setup for under a grand:

The Sub-$1000 Hackintosh:
Rosewill case with 300-watt power supply - $30
Intel Bad Axe 2 - $175
Intel 2.4ghz Quad Q6600 processor - $280
4GB Transcend DDR2-800 (2x2GB) - $41 x 2 = $82
20x DVD burner with Lightscribe - $38
256mb 7300GT video card - $70
320gb SATA hard drive - $85 (for primary Leopard boot drive)
500gb SATA hard drive - $105 (for Time Machine automatic backup)

Total comes up to $865 (plus tax/shipping) for a 2.4ghz Quad-Core machine, 4 gigs of ram, a 7300GT video card, fast DVD burner, large hard drive, and a Time Machine backup drive. This is a complete system, ready to go, for under $1,000. You will also need Leopard ($109 if you shop around) plus a monitor (Dell monitors are much more cost effective than Apple monitors), keyboard, mouse, and speakers. You can use Apple's Bluetooth stuff by purchasing a simple Bluetooth USB adapter (D-Link has one for $25 or you can get a cheaper one from OWC or eBay). Certain Wifi adapters are supported all the way up to 802.11n, there's a cheap USB model on eBay called "Ralink" or "Air Link" I believe. You can also pick up a USB sound card for under ten bucks on eBay (for audio input as well as output), or just snag a USB mic if you prefer.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
I am building a second Hackintosh this week using a $50 Gigabyte board. The limitation is that it only supports a maximum of 2 gigs of ram (and I believe only dual-core chips), but it's a great (expandable) alternative to the Mac Mini. Pair up with an inexpensive Core 2 Duo chip, a couple gigs of ram, that $30 Rosewill case/psu, and a 7300GT, you can save quite a bit of money and get a more powerful "low-end" machine than the Mini offers. This is also a great option if you want an HTPC and the Mac Mini won't cut it for you for HD playback. Here's the board:

Gigabyte GA-945GCMX-S2 - $45

Optionally pair that up with a nice mATX HTPC case:

Antecn NSK2480 with quality 380w PSU - $80

You can make a pretty nice "real" HD AppleTV clone using that. Install Perian and voila, Apple multimedia center! You can even use a Wiimote as your Front Row controller!

http://sourceforge.net/projects/darwiin-remote/
 

AmigaMan

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,644
1
0
Originally posted by: Kaido
I am building a second Hackintosh this week using a $50 Gigabyte board. The limitation is that it only supports a maximum of 2 gigs of ram (and I believe only dual-core chips), but it's a great (expandable) alternative to the Mac Mini. Pair up with an inexpensive Core 2 Duo chip, a couple gigs of ram, that $30 Rosewill case/psu, and a 7300GT, you can save quite a bit of money and get a more powerful "low-end" machine than the Mini offers. This is also a great option if you want an HTPC and the Mac Mini won't cut it for you for HD playback. Here's the board:

Gigabyte GA-945GCMX-S2 - $45

Optionally pair that up with a nice mATX HTPC case:

Antecn NSK2480 with quality 380w PSU - $80

You can make a pretty nice "real" HD AppleTV clone using that. Install Perian and voila, Apple multimedia center! You can even use a Wiimote as your Front Row controller!

http://sourceforge.net/projects/darwiin-remote/

are there any mobo's out there that would work that support more than 2GB of RAM?
 

umrigar

Platinum Member
Jun 3, 2004
2,088
0
0
Don't forget to spec out a refurbished MacPro as a comparison, too.

They cost $1900 + tax. $300 less than the same configuration at the regular Apple prices.

Nice writeup, though. Certainly makes one think about a $1000 Hackintosh.


 

bigrash

Lifer
Feb 20, 2001
17,648
28
91
I've really been thinking about doing this since I don't have a mac right now. I guess the only thing I might need changing is a new motherboard and more ram. I have to do more reasearch to see if my mobo would work with this.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: AmigaMan
Originally posted by: Kaido
I am building a second Hackintosh this week using a $50 Gigabyte board. The limitation is that it only supports a maximum of 2 gigs of ram (and I believe only dual-core chips), but it's a great (expandable) alternative to the Mac Mini. Pair up with an inexpensive Core 2 Duo chip, a couple gigs of ram, that $30 Rosewill case/psu, and a 7300GT, you can save quite a bit of money and get a more powerful "low-end" machine than the Mini offers. This is also a great option if you want an HTPC and the Mac Mini won't cut it for you for HD playback. Here's the board:

Gigabyte GA-945GCMX-S2 - $45

Optionally pair that up with a nice mATX HTPC case:

Antecn NSK2480 with quality 380w PSU - $80

You can make a pretty nice "real" HD AppleTV clone using that. Install Perian and voila, Apple multimedia center! You can even use a Wiimote as your Front Row controller!

http://sourceforge.net/projects/darwiin-remote/

are there any mobo's out there that would work that support more than 2GB of RAM?

Yes, read my original post for details - I'm running 8 gigs in my machine ($200 from Newegg!). One guy on the InsanelyMac forums is running 32 gigs on his dual-Xeon Hackintosh :D
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,732
6,758
136
Originally posted by: bigrash
I've really been thinking about doing this since I don't have a mac right now. I guess the only thing I might need changing is a new motherboard and more ram. I have to do more reasearch to see if my mobo would work with this.

bigrash, your motherboard is 100% supported - everything works in Hackintosh. Also, 4 gigs is plenty! lol. Download this package:

http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=76014

Follow the instructions step-by-step. Even though it is written for the Bad Axe 2, it should work perfectly on your board. Just skip installing the Sound Driver after reboot. It will install the driver the 7000-series video cards, but your video card will only run in VESA mode. Edit: Looks like it only needs AppleSMBIOS & IONetworkingFamily, you might be able to skip dsmos.kext. If you want, remove dsmos.kext and NVinject.kext from the instructions in the Terminal (it simply won't install them if you don't type them in). Otherwise it probably wouldn't hurt to install dsmos.kext...play with it.

The only part of your system that I don't think will work is the 8800 - if it's a G80 it should work, but if it's G90 it won't work. Read up here for more information:

http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=65849

According to this thread, 8800GTs are not working currently:

http://forum.insanelymac.com/i...wtopic=70247&hl=8800gt

I'm running a 320mb XFX 8800 GTS and it is working fabulously. If you really want to get into Hackintosh, sell your GT and upgrade to a known working GTS or other high-power compatible model. They are going for around $200 used and in the $250 range if you can find a good deal on them.

******

For everyone else, here is a list of known working motherboards:

http://wiki.osx86project.org/w...CL_10.5.0#Motherboards

If it's not on the list then it simply hasn't been tested and documented yet.