- Nov 26, 2001
- 4,112
- 2
- 0
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/8800gs.jpg
EVGA 8800GS
PCI-E 2.0 x16
Core Clock:550 MHz
Shader Clock:1375 MHz
Memory Clock:800 MHz (1600 DDR)
Memory Bandwidth:38.4 GB/sec
Pixel Fillrate:6600 MPixels/sec
Texture Fillrate:26400 MTexels/sec
Test System:
E6300 @ 3.05 ghz on a Scythe Mine with custom 120mm fan for 800/1200/1600rpm
Asus P5B vanilla
2 gigs @ 870 mhz 5-5-5-15 timing
Onboard Soundmax audio
Samsung 250gig
Hitachi 160 gig
19? Viewsonic VA1912WB
Antec Sonata 2 with SP 2.0 450watt
Vista x86 ultimate
Nvidia 174.74
All tests are done at 1440x900 otherwise noted.
Tested:
3dmark
Crysis 1.2
World in Conflict
Need 4 Speed Prostreet
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/3dmark.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files...0/pixel%20fillrate.jpg
As you can see, pixel fillrate does hold back by memory bandwidth to a certain extent but core clock speed increases does more than memory bandwidth alone.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files...texture%20fillrate.jpg
Texture fillrate doesn?t get affected by memory bandwidth. Notice 8600gts texture fillrate is rather low for a card with a theoretical fillrate of 11200 MTexels/s @ clock speed of 700mhz. G92 has improved its texture throughput over G84 by 20+ percent.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/SM3.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/crysis%20cover.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/Crysis.jpg
Benchmark was done with GPU portion of in game crysis benchmark. The new 174.74 drivers gave me substantial increase in FPS over the drivers CD, nearly 3fps in high settings. CD was using older 169 set of drivers. I would say it performs very close to 8800gt at those frame rates especially dx9 high settings.
I was able to play Dx9 high settings near smoothness. It does dip to high teens in Ice Level and the Deck however it was much more enjoyable. I was able to turn up shader to very high with minimal impact in fps. Post processing at very high in the other hand dropped my fps by 60+%. It might have something to do with 8800gs 384mb vram.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/WIC%20cover.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/WIC.jpg
Dx10 high settings were using 2xAA and Dx10 highest uses 4xAA by default. Biggest problem with 8800gs with WIC is the 384mb vram that hampers AA performance. Biggest gains from the overclock were @ dx10 highest without AA.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/NFS.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/NFS%20BMW.jpg
My custom BMW M3 E46 was used for this benchmark.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/Prostreet.jpg
The game was tested with fraps using Autobahn GP gripclass track. It?s a 3 lap course. This game seems to love shader. Notice the substantial gain again from the overclock once again. At 8xAA I was able to get nearly 20 more fps over the 8600gts.
Conclusions:
What compelled me to buy this card over the 9600gt was that it has 96SP and more texture fillrate and it was cheaper. I?m on a 19? LCD monitor where memory bandwidth isn?t really an issue but longevity of the card. I do think that as more game use more shader 8800gs will surpass 9600gt in raw performance. Currently these cards are about equal in terms of raw performance. 8800gs wins some and 9600gt win some. At those overclocks however I?m convinced 8800gs does take the cake in medium resolutions where memory capacity or memory bandwidth isn?t an issue. 9600gt however will always do better with AA in higher resolutions because of bigger memory module and memory bandwidth. At 1044mhz/2088DDR it?s not exactly slow either. That?s 50.2GB/s where stock 9600gt is 57.6GB/s.
The card was very quiet. At 700rpm in windows it wasn?t even audible to my ear. My case doesn?t exactly have lot of airflow with only 1 800rpm case fan and the size of this card made my cpu temperature rise by 5C. The temperature reached 80C with the overclock which I edited the bios to make the card fans to be more aggressive to 55% when gaming. It sits at 76C on load. At 55% fan speed it?s only a slight hum to my ear.
With a huge overclock it gained as much as 30% more fps. Hopefully you gained some important information from this review.
Pros: Cheap price, Excellent performance per $$$, highly overclockable, quiet heatsink fan, 96 Stream processors, 1ns memory, life time warranty
Cons: Limited quantity, 384mb vram, huge size which can block airflow if you have a medium size case
EVGA 8800GS
PCI-E 2.0 x16
Core Clock:550 MHz
Shader Clock:1375 MHz
Memory Clock:800 MHz (1600 DDR)
Memory Bandwidth:38.4 GB/sec
Pixel Fillrate:6600 MPixels/sec
Texture Fillrate:26400 MTexels/sec
Test System:
E6300 @ 3.05 ghz on a Scythe Mine with custom 120mm fan for 800/1200/1600rpm
Asus P5B vanilla
2 gigs @ 870 mhz 5-5-5-15 timing
Onboard Soundmax audio
Samsung 250gig
Hitachi 160 gig
19? Viewsonic VA1912WB
Antec Sonata 2 with SP 2.0 450watt
Vista x86 ultimate
Nvidia 174.74
All tests are done at 1440x900 otherwise noted.
Tested:
3dmark
Crysis 1.2
World in Conflict
Need 4 Speed Prostreet
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/3dmark.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files...0/pixel%20fillrate.jpg
As you can see, pixel fillrate does hold back by memory bandwidth to a certain extent but core clock speed increases does more than memory bandwidth alone.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files...texture%20fillrate.jpg
Texture fillrate doesn?t get affected by memory bandwidth. Notice 8600gts texture fillrate is rather low for a card with a theoretical fillrate of 11200 MTexels/s @ clock speed of 700mhz. G92 has improved its texture throughput over G84 by 20+ percent.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/SM3.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/crysis%20cover.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/Crysis.jpg
Benchmark was done with GPU portion of in game crysis benchmark. The new 174.74 drivers gave me substantial increase in FPS over the drivers CD, nearly 3fps in high settings. CD was using older 169 set of drivers. I would say it performs very close to 8800gt at those frame rates especially dx9 high settings.
I was able to play Dx9 high settings near smoothness. It does dip to high teens in Ice Level and the Deck however it was much more enjoyable. I was able to turn up shader to very high with minimal impact in fps. Post processing at very high in the other hand dropped my fps by 60+%. It might have something to do with 8800gs 384mb vram.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/WIC%20cover.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/WIC.jpg
Dx10 high settings were using 2xAA and Dx10 highest uses 4xAA by default. Biggest problem with 8800gs with WIC is the 384mb vram that hampers AA performance. Biggest gains from the overclock were @ dx10 highest without AA.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/NFS.jpg
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/NFS%20BMW.jpg
My custom BMW M3 E46 was used for this benchmark.
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/56830/Prostreet.jpg
The game was tested with fraps using Autobahn GP gripclass track. It?s a 3 lap course. This game seems to love shader. Notice the substantial gain again from the overclock once again. At 8xAA I was able to get nearly 20 more fps over the 8600gts.
Conclusions:
What compelled me to buy this card over the 9600gt was that it has 96SP and more texture fillrate and it was cheaper. I?m on a 19? LCD monitor where memory bandwidth isn?t really an issue but longevity of the card. I do think that as more game use more shader 8800gs will surpass 9600gt in raw performance. Currently these cards are about equal in terms of raw performance. 8800gs wins some and 9600gt win some. At those overclocks however I?m convinced 8800gs does take the cake in medium resolutions where memory capacity or memory bandwidth isn?t an issue. 9600gt however will always do better with AA in higher resolutions because of bigger memory module and memory bandwidth. At 1044mhz/2088DDR it?s not exactly slow either. That?s 50.2GB/s where stock 9600gt is 57.6GB/s.
The card was very quiet. At 700rpm in windows it wasn?t even audible to my ear. My case doesn?t exactly have lot of airflow with only 1 800rpm case fan and the size of this card made my cpu temperature rise by 5C. The temperature reached 80C with the overclock which I edited the bios to make the card fans to be more aggressive to 55% when gaming. It sits at 76C on load. At 55% fan speed it?s only a slight hum to my ear.
With a huge overclock it gained as much as 30% more fps. Hopefully you gained some important information from this review.
Pros: Cheap price, Excellent performance per $$$, highly overclockable, quiet heatsink fan, 96 Stream processors, 1ns memory, life time warranty
Cons: Limited quantity, 384mb vram, huge size which can block airflow if you have a medium size case
Facebook
Twitter