My BFG 6800GT benchies using different CPUs and Platforms

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,680
31,537
146
BFG 6800GT OC@431/1.1ghz *Basically BFG 6800U OC speeds*

***I will update with the rest of the A64 results this evening. I'm waiting on the new PSU for that system***

sktA Test System:
Shuttle SN45G
1GB 3200DDR 2.5-3-3-11
Maxtor PATA 120gb 8mb cache
Athlon 4 Mobile@1.2ghz 300DC-DDR Synch
2400+ T-bred B@2ghz 266DC-DDR Synch
2400+ T-bred B@2.2ghz 400DC-DDR Synch
WinXP Pro SP1
DX9.0b
Detonator 61.76 WHQL

skt754 Test System:
Shuttle AN50R
1GB 3200DDR 3-3-3-11
Raptor SATA 36.6GB
A64 512kb 3000+@2.4ghz= 3400+
WinXP Pro SP1
DX9.0b
Detonator 61.76 WHQL


FarCry Test Settings:
Hardware OC FarCry Benchmark Tool
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Pixel shader: default model
Antialising: 4×
Anisotrophic filtering: 8×
Resolutions Tested: 1280x1024 *1024x768 for the A64*
***All tests run twice and the average fps is displayed***

***Testing problem with FarCry. It is not using 1600x1200 even though I set the benchmark tool for that resolution. 1280x1024 is the native res of my LCD so that this tool evidently does not force the higher res. Consequently all the 16x12 scores are pulled. I added 1024x768 to the A64 bench in order to provide some contrast to the 1280x1024 score***

Call Of Duty Test Settings:
Bench'emAll
Antialising: 4×
Anisotrophic filtering: 8×
Resolutions Tested: 1024x768 1600x1200
***All tests run twice and the average fps is displayed***

***Testing problem with CoD. The fps is capped@60fps which is my LCD's default refresh rate. I tried forcing a higher refresh and using custom settings but when I go back in the properties it's disabled and the default settings are applied again. If someone could suggest a good tool for forcing a non-native res and refresh I'd be much obliged :) All I can derive from this botched test is that every clockspeed but the 1.2ghz mobile is capable of hitting the cap with a 6800GT@BFG ULTRA OC speed :( ***

3DMark2001


Athlon 4@1.2ghz 11279


2400+ 14797


2400+@2.2ghz 17829


A64 512kb 3400+ 23120



3DMark2003


Athlon 4@1.2ghz 9549


2400+ 10476


2400+@2.2ghz 10981


A64 3400+ 11848



AquaMark3



athlon 4@1.2ghz 31.8 fps


2400+ 44.7 fps


2400+@2.2ghz 53.6 fps


A64 3400+ 64.2 fps



Call Of Duty: Demo name: Timedemo1-Team Deathmatch MP_Dawnville


Athlon 4@1.2ghz:


1024x768 28.0 seconds: 54.7 fps


1600x1200 27.8 seconds: 55.3 fps


2400+:


1024x768 25.7 seconds: 59.6 fps


1600x1200 25.5 seconds: 60.1 fps


2400+@2.2ghz:


1024x768 25.6 seconds: 60.0 fps


1600x1200 25.4 seconds: 60.4 fps



A64 3400+ ***capped@60.5fps***



FarCry: Ubisoft Regulator Demo


1280x1024

Athlon 4@1.2ghz 35.72 fps


2400+ 39.42 fps


2400+@2.2ghz 42.95 fps


A64 3400+ 1024x768 61.67 fps 1280x1024 47.47 fps



FarCry: Ubisoft Volcano Demo


1280x1024


Athlon 4@1.2ghz: 50.94 fps


2400+: 52.84 fps


2400+@2.2ghz: 52.93 fps


A64 3400+: 1024x768 76.26 fps 1280x1024 54.44 fps




Unreal Tournament 2003 Demo Benchmark


1024x768

Athlon 4@1.2ghz:

Fly by: 119.9 fps

Botmatch: 43 fps


2400+:

Fly by: 172.4 fps

Botmatch: 64.9 fps


2400+@2.2ghz:

Fly by: 212.9 fps

Botmatch: 79.5 fps



A64 3400+:

Fly By: 294.8 fps

Botmatch: 111 fps


1600x1200


Athlon 4@1.2ghz:

Fly by: 115.8 fps

Botmatch: 40.9 fps


2400+:

Fly by: 172.5 fps

Botmatch: 61.8 fps


2400+@2.2ghz:

Fly by: 211.5 fps

Botmatch: 75.4 fps




A64 3400+:

Fly By: 234 fps

Botmatch: 104 fps
 

stardust

Golden Member
May 17, 2003
1,282
0
0
Awesome man, but I noticed your FPS actually increase when you went from 1280x1024 to 1600x1200 on Farcry!! Shows how CPU bottlenecks are affecting your benching, I can't wait for your A64 benchies!
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,680
31,537
146
I've been on "do not operate a motor vehicle" medication for a cold the last few days so it's possible I copy&pasted those backwards :eek: It's close enough for goverment work though, and still demonstrates that@that res. game settings, and AA/AF that the CPU isn't a huge factor in those titles.
 

stardust

Golden Member
May 17, 2003
1,282
0
0
Well then it must be a huge accomplishment for you to benchmark under "drugged" conditions! You have my envy :) I'll definitely do similar benchies once I get my 6800GTOC and see how our rigs stack up..

In the meantime, have fun blasting away zombies with your new rig and hope you get your soltek mobo
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,680
31,537
146
Originally posted by: stardust
Well then it must be a huge accomplishment for you to benchmark under "drugged" conditions! You have my envy :) I'll definitely do similar benchies once I get my 6800GTOC and see how our rigs stack up..

In the meantime, have fun blasting away zombies with your new rig and hope you get your soltek mobo
Thnaks brudda :beer: I promise your's will befaster with the 250GB :) There are forceware opts between the 6800 and nF3 250GB plus you won't have to settle for the whimpy 600HTT/LDT I am either.
 

stardust

Golden Member
May 17, 2003
1,282
0
0
You know we should have more people bumping this thread up.. too many people come in and look at your numbers and leave without even a good word or something..yet the argument threads that repost information are flaming hot..

We are getting less and less home benchies and we need to encourage people who take the time to make them for us!
 

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
good info but you still need to do your A64 benches :)

question about your overclocked 3000+... did you run 1:1 or 5:6?

10 x 240 = 2.4 ghz
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
prefer to see tests w/ mobile @2.4 as well....?


edit duh... you don't have an XPmobile... Mobile 4??
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,680
31,537
146
Originally posted by: Shimmishim
good info but you still need to do your A64 benches :)

question about your overclocked 3000+... did you run 1:1 or 5:6?

10 x 240 = 2.4 ghz
It's hard to finish without a PSU brudda :) I'm running 240HTT but with 2.5x multi for 600HTT/LDT, and yes I also have the ram@the default 400DDR this way. That should make it in essence a 3400+ 512k cache system correct?

Just completed open heart surgery

GT cameo


Originally posted by: Zebo
prefer to see tests w/ mobile @2.4 as well....?


edit duh... you don't have an XPmobile... Mobile 4??
It's a weird one alright. CPU-z kept saying it was 64k l1 and 64k l2 but I googled it and it said 384kb total with the 64+64 being l1. It's a Palomino core. If you would like Barton mobile benchies just send me yours and I'll get 'em going :p

I'll get those benchies run now and post up what I got, thanks for perusing what I finished gentlemen, and ladies as well, if reading this :)
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,680
31,537
146
Originally posted by: soulflyfan
excelent post *bump* lookin good for my XP2400+ :)
Thanks brudda :beer: Updated to include testing issues = :eek:
 

stardust

Golden Member
May 17, 2003
1,282
0
0
I'll beat shimm as soon as I get new memory... ;) I just reached 2.6ghz @ 1.7V and CPU is only 40C load.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,680
31,537
146
Originally posted by: stardust
I'll beat shimm as soon as I get new memory... ;) I just reached 2.6ghz @ 1.7V and CPU is only 40C load.

:Q Nice! :beer:
 

Marsumane

Golden Member
Mar 9, 2004
1,171
0
0
Nice numbers. You should also post this in the video forum sense it has to do w/ gaming benchmarks. Maybe thats just my opinon though.