- Feb 10, 2000
- 30,029
- 67
- 91
Here's one for the physics experts out there; forgive me for the very elementary (and likely dopey) nature of the question.
It is common knowledge that the longer a gun's barrel is, the higher its muzzle velocity, assuming equal weight, equally-loaded rounds. Why is this?
My crude layperson's assumption has been that the explosion of the primer burns off the air in the barrel (or at least its oxygen), creating a vacuum through which the round travels more easily than in the ambient air. Once the bullet emerges from the barrel, wind resistance comes into effect, causing it to lose velocity as it travels. Is this even close?
Please be gentle, as I am the farthest thing from a physicist (my undergrad degree was a BA, and I barely made it through high school physics).
It is common knowledge that the longer a gun's barrel is, the higher its muzzle velocity, assuming equal weight, equally-loaded rounds. Why is this?
My crude layperson's assumption has been that the explosion of the primer burns off the air in the barrel (or at least its oxygen), creating a vacuum through which the round travels more easily than in the ambient air. Once the bullet emerges from the barrel, wind resistance comes into effect, causing it to lose velocity as it travels. Is this even close?
Please be gentle, as I am the farthest thing from a physicist (my undergrad degree was a BA, and I barely made it through high school physics).
