Mustang GT vs LS1 Trans AM

[Syringer]

Might be choosing between the two in a little while..so which would you choose?

 

[iwearnosox]

Redkneck!

 

[Rent]

TA no contest.

 

[Zim Hosein]

Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Redkneck!

Haha

Trans Am over GT

 

[LikeLinus]

2003 Mustang Cobra - 390hp of 4.6 Supercharged goodness. It lays the smack down on Corvettes and eats Z28/TA for breakfast

 

[notfred]

Mustang.

 

[Zenmervolt]

Depends. If new, then Mustang by a large margin. But I've always had a soft spot for the '80s Trans Ams. Probably from too much Knight Rider as a kid.

ZV

 

[incallisto]

Originally posted by: notfred
Mustang.

GT over Trans Am

 

[iwearnosox]

This thread is like redkneck flypaper.

=)

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: iwearnosox
This thread is like redkneck flypaper.

=)

hardly


i'd take an SS, then GT, then TA

 

[Yossarian]

trans am heheh... breaker breaker you got a smokey on your tail, Bandit!

 

[Squisher]

I took the wife's Z28 out today to give it an oil change(it hasn't been driven since Oct.).

Let me say that GM muscle put a big smile on my face.

 

[DaiShan]

Originally posted by: LikeLinus
2003 Mustang Cobra - 390hp of 4.6 Supercharged goodness. It lays the smack down on Corvettes and eats Z28/TA for breakfast

And then there is the Z06...

 

[speed01]

GT any day...

 

[incallisto]

Originally posted by: iwearnosox
This thread is like redkneck flypaper.

=)

At least learn how to spell "Redneck" before you call me one.

 

[Angrymarshmello]

If it's a 99-03 GT then the GT...if it's a SN95 94-98 GT then a LS1 TA. The Mach1 is pretty frickin' fast though...new cams and intake manifold (lifted from the Navi) makes it a low 13 second car on par with the TA.

 

[formulav8]

Depends if you want power or not. The TA has had more power than the GT since 1993. I prefer power so, I have a 98 Z.

 

[formulav8]

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
If it's a 99-03 GT then the GT...if it's a SN95 94-98 GT then a LS1 TA. The Mach1 is pretty frickin' fast though...new cams and intake manifold (lifted from the Navi) makes it a low 13 second car on par with the TA.

You don't need to do anything to the LS1 TA and already be low 13's. Even a few high 12's BONE stock. Haven't seen any GT's or Mach1's do that yet.

 

[Angrymarshmello]

Originally posted by: formulav8

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
If it's a 99-03 GT then the GT...if it's a SN95 94-98 GT then a LS1 TA. The Mach1 is pretty frickin' fast though...new cams and intake manifold (lifted from the Navi) makes it a low 13 second car on par with the TA.

You don't need to do anything to the LS1 TA and already be low 13's. Even a few high 12's BONE stock. Haven't seen any GT's or Mach1's do that yet.

I know that. I'm a bigger fan of Mustangs than I am Camaros/TAs. I know LS1's are fast - I've seen my share of LS1's rip off massive times at the 1/8 track in Sanger and the 1/4 in Ennis bone stock that embarress their counterpart Mustangs, but I'd take a Mustang anyday over a Camaro/Firebird.

 

[WinkOsmosis]

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH

Originally posted by: formulav8

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
If it's a 99-03 GT then the GT...if it's a SN95 94-98 GT then a LS1 TA. The Mach1 is pretty frickin' fast though...new cams and intake manifold (lifted from the Navi) makes it a low 13 second car on par with the TA.

You don't need to do anything to the LS1 TA and already be low 13's. Even a few high 12's BONE stock. Haven't seen any GT's or Mach1's do that yet.

I know that. I'm a bigger fan of Mustangs than I am Camaros/TAs. I know LS1's are fast - I've seen my share of LS1's rip off massive times at the 1/8 track in Sanger and the 1/4 in Ennis bone stock that embarress their counterpart Mustangs, but I'd take a Mustang anyday over a Camaro/Firebird.

That's cuz you a sucka!

 

[Angrymarshmello]

Originally posted by: Jellomancer

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH

Originally posted by: formulav8

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
If it's a 99-03 GT then the GT...if it's a SN95 94-98 GT then a LS1 TA. The Mach1 is pretty frickin' fast though...new cams and intake manifold (lifted from the Navi) makes it a low 13 second car on par with the TA.

You don't need to do anything to the LS1 TA and already be low 13's. Even a few high 12's BONE stock. Haven't seen any GT's or Mach1's do that yet.

I know that. I'm a bigger fan of Mustangs than I am Camaros/TAs. I know LS1's are fast - I've seen my share of LS1's rip off massive times at the 1/8 track in Sanger and the 1/4 in Ennis bone stock that embarress their counterpart Mustangs, but I'd take a Mustang anyday over a Camaro/Firebird.

That's cuz you a sucka!

I could say something about your GF and suckas but I'll refrain from doing so...

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH

I could say something about your GF and suckas but I'll refrain from doing so...

methinks that not his GF

 

[CraigRT]

GM over Ford
I think the Camaro SS is better than the TA personally.

 

[Triumph]

The T/A has more power, more torque, better gas mileage, an awesome 6 speed, a good aftermarket, and it can be made to handle quite well. plus i think the Mustang is a chick car.

 

[SlowSS]

Definitely TA.