Muslim attacks Athiest dressed as Mohammad, Pennsyl. Muslim Judge Sides w/ Attacker

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,515
4,301
136
What if the "victim" was instead portraying and diabolizing black people
with a mock paint and the word niiggeer written on his cloathes
???..

Indeed , the muslims are the current NNiigers in the ill
borned US mentality and collective irrationnality....
 
Last edited:

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
title of thread needs to change. the Judge is NOT a muslim.
The audio from the courtroom is in the link I posted. The Judge clearly states he's a Muslim.

He says he's a Muslim, he writes he's a Lutheran. He's a liar, that much I do know. His faith is still in question.

On a side note, why does the extreme left have disdain and contempt for every organized religion - except the Muslim faith?
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
The audio from the courtroom is in the link I posted. The Judge clearly states he's a Muslim.

He says he's a Muslim, he writes he's a Lutheran. He's a liar, that much I do know. His faith is still in question.

On a side note, why does the extreme left have disdain and contempt for every organized religion - except the Muslim faith?

Intentional ignorance and trolling all in one post...kudos!

1. You misheard his quote, it has been posted several times.

2. He isn't a Muslim, nothing to debate about, sorry you are wrong as usual

3. Who said he was liberal? Or is this just once again your opinion that all people that disagree with you are somehow liberals?
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Judge should be impeached. That said, if the judge and assailant were both Christian, people would be saying, serves that atheist right.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
I would not have thrown the case out. People have a right to express their freedom of Speech. The real problem is Muslims believe you can kill anyone who goes against your religion. This religion of Murder has to stop!

The Judge was a liberal Coward!
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
I still do not understand, can someone explain it? The attacker admits he attacked the victem. The victem admits he was attacked. The police say the attacker attacked the victem.

The judge says there is not enough evidence to convict.

???
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
What if the "victim" was instead portraying and diabolizing black people
with a mock paint and the word niiggeer written on his cloathes
???..

Indeed , the muslims are the current NNiigers in the ill
borned US mentality and collective irrationnality....

It would still be against the law to attack him.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Not really on topic, but every time I read the judge's remarks this stands out as odd (nice word for "BS"):

I DO have a Quran on the bookcase BESIDE my bench, and am trying to acquire a Torah, Book of Mormon, Book of Confucius and any other artifacts which those with a faith might respect).

How hard is he "trying"?

Go online. You can get any of these books easily and inexpensively and FedEx etc will deliver it to you in a few days. Heck, the Mormons will give you one of their bibles for free, all you gotta do is ask.

So he's "trying"? Really?

Fern
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Not really on topic, but every time I read the judge's remarks this stands out as odd (nice word for "BS"):



How hard is he "trying"?

Go online. You can get any of these books easily and inexpensively and FedEx etc will deliver it to you in a few days. Heck, the Mormons will give you one of their bibles for free, all you gotta do is ask.

So he's "trying"? Really?

Fern

You seem to be assuming that he's using his own funds. Perhaps he is going through some administrative process to cover the expenses.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
I still do not understand, can someone explain it? The attacker admits he attacked the victem. The victem admits he was attacked. The police say the attacker attacked the victem.

The judge says there is not enough evidence to convict.

???

The police did not say the defendant attacked the alleged victim.

According to an article posted here in this thread: "it appears that Elbayomy was prosecuted for criminal harassment, which requires an “intent to harass, annoy, or alarm,” and a mere physical attack with an attempt to grab a sign might or might not qualify, see the pen-grabbing discussion in this case. The acquittal itself might thus be justified, depending on exactly what evidence was introduced."