• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mushkin / Crucial PC2100 (differences?)

M

Mixster

Member
Hey there, just a quick question to see if there was a general preference between these two, or just whoever is cheaper? Or, is there another third party that I'm forgetting. I haven't decided whether to OC or not yet, so let's assume it will be used for that. Any thoughts?

-Mix
 
i have seen people getting pretty good clocks out of the crucial (160s-170s)... but it is always luck of the draw... i would go crucial just cuz i like them but that would be bias...

Josh
 
Luck of the draw is right, in my experience crucial is much better. Oc'd to 160 where the mushkin did only 140. Others have said different.
 
Mushkin = Excellent customer support, they promote "overclocking" more
Crucial = Cheaper, similar quality to mushkin, most of the time can be clocked just as high or slightly lower...

I run mostly mushkin, I like the Overclocking support, Like customer support too, but i'll admit Crucial is the best bang for the buck these days. I'm probally building my 100mhz file sever with Crucial
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top