Which you added & also edited 2.5 hours after the fact.r u blind, go read the thread, there was commentary
Which you added & also edited 2.5 hours after the fact.r u blind, go read the thread, there was commentary
Which you added & also edited 2.5 hours after the fact.
r u blind, go read the thread, there was commentary
Which you added & also edited 2.5 hours after the fact. Which you added & also edited 2.5 hours after the fact.r u blind, go read the thread, there was commentary
quit lying
Good to know, thanks.While this is terrible and a high profile loss, the overall number of Green on blue attacks have steadily decreased since the past few years.
While this is terrible and a high profile loss, the overall number of Green on blue attacks have steadily decreased since the past few years.
I wonder if they've decreased more than linearly with the drawdown of troops?
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/05/world/asia/afghanistan-violence/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
"According to an April 2013 Pentagon report, insider attacks against ISAF forces declined from 48 attacks in 2012 to 15 attacks in 2013. In the first quarter of 2014, there were two insider attacks against ISAF."
Are you stupid? You edited your thread long after your original post to add that commentary. Your original original post had no commentary just a link.
r u blind, go read the thread, there was commentary
quit makin schitt up
No argument with that logic.
Just like in Nam, REMF received combat medals
Hey, genius: your edits are time stamped. You edited it two hours after you posted the thread, and after you were called out on it here.
everyone ignore the liars/haiters and go yak about dis in da ORIGINAL thread:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2394027
No argument with that logic.
Just like in Nam, REMF received combat medals
