frowertr
Golden Member
I currently have a detached building (building is in separate location from where router is located) with one LAN (lets call it "A") currently. I ran a "trunk" ethernet wire years ago from the router to the detached building so the LAN would have internet access.
I now find myself wanting to add two additional LANs to that building (call them "B" and "C"). LANs "A" and "B" should be able to talk freely to one another. However, LAN "C" needs to basically be a DMZ. I do need "A" and "B" to be able to talk to LAN "C" if need be, but I don't want LAN "C" to be able to initiate a connection to LANs "A" and "B". Does that make sense? All three LANS still need internet access.
Now, I know I could simply run two additional ethernet lines for the two new LANS and attach them directly to the router and setup the router that way. But I was wondering if there would be an easier way and just using the existing "trunk" line.
Hope this made sense...
I now find myself wanting to add two additional LANs to that building (call them "B" and "C"). LANs "A" and "B" should be able to talk freely to one another. However, LAN "C" needs to basically be a DMZ. I do need "A" and "B" to be able to talk to LAN "C" if need be, but I don't want LAN "C" to be able to initiate a connection to LANs "A" and "B". Does that make sense? All three LANS still need internet access.
Now, I know I could simply run two additional ethernet lines for the two new LANS and attach them directly to the router and setup the router that way. But I was wondering if there would be an easier way and just using the existing "trunk" line.
Hope this made sense...
