• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

MSNBC : Report doesn?t back weapons claims

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Link


WASHINGTON, June 6 ? The Pentagon?s intelligence agency had no hard evidence of Iraqi chemical weapons last fall but believed Iraq had a program in place to produce them, the agency?s chief said Friday. The assessment suggests a higher degree of uncertainty about the immediacy of an Iraqi threat ? at least with regard to one portion of its banned weapons programs ? than the Bush administration indicated publicly in building its case for disarming Iraq, with force if necessary.
 

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
Ya' gotta' love the irony in Blix' statement:

The United States forced the end of U.N. weapons inspections prior to going to war, against the wishes of the inspectors, who had asked for more time.
?They did not have patience for that,? the lead inspector, Hans Blix, said in a telephone interview broadcast on Colombian radio on Friday. ?However, of course what I notice now is that when the American inspectors do not find anything, then it is suggested we should have patience.?

The American inspectors haven't found anything because there isn't anything to find. That's why Blix and ElBaradei didn't find anything either. And if anyone remembers the Iraqis were destroying missiles Blix requested up to the day of Bush's invasion.

Bush lied about national security. No excuse for that.

Time to start the impeachment proceedings!
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Link


WASHINGTON, June 6 ? The Pentagon?s intelligence agency had no hard evidence of Iraqi chemical weapons last fall but believed Iraq had a program in place to produce them, the agency?s chief said Friday. The assessment suggests a higher degree of uncertainty about the immediacy of an Iraqi threat ? at least with regard to one portion of its banned weapons programs ? than the Bush administration indicated publicly in building its case for disarming Iraq, with force if necessary.

This, I fear, is but the tip of the Moonberg. The mass of truth is moving and with its momentum not even the friction of Bush can halt the progress... This is a world issue so containment is futile. You will be assimulated... you "bush in the birds"...!
 

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
Originally posted by: HJD1
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Link


WASHINGTON, June 6 ? The Pentagon?s intelligence agency had no hard evidence of Iraqi chemical weapons last fall but believed Iraq had a program in place to produce them, the agency?s chief said Friday. The assessment suggests a higher degree of uncertainty about the immediacy of an Iraqi threat ? at least with regard to one portion of its banned weapons programs ? than the Bush administration indicated publicly in building its case for disarming Iraq, with force if necessary.

This, I fear, is but the tip of the Moonberg. The mass of truth is moving and with its momentum not even the friction of Bush can halt the progress... This is a world issue so containment is futile. You will be assimulated... you "bush in the birds"...!
A Bush in the birds is worth none in the White House


Does Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur apply to Saddam Hussein?
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: HJD1
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Link


WASHINGTON, June 6 ? The Pentagon?s intelligence agency had no hard evidence of Iraqi chemical weapons last fall but believed Iraq had a program in place to produce them, the agency?s chief said Friday. The assessment suggests a higher degree of uncertainty about the immediacy of an Iraqi threat ? at least with regard to one portion of its banned weapons programs ? than the Bush administration indicated publicly in building its case for disarming Iraq, with force if necessary.

This, I fear, is but the tip of the Moonberg. The mass of truth is moving and with its momentum not even the friction of Bush can halt the progress... This is a world issue so containment is futile. You will be assimulated... you "bush in the birds"...!
A Bush in the birds is worth none in the White House


Does Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur apply to Saddam Hussein?

A Bush... Yup!
WE said there was circumstantial evidence to support issues. But, maybe it appears that we may have used it but, said otherwise. I'm not sure. But, the right conclusion won't result if applied with mal gree or malo animo.;) Something always jumps up and bites ya on the butt.:)
 

Tripleshot

Elite Member
Jan 29, 2000
7,218
0
0
Blame it on the liberal media. Do it now before all the right wing wacked out conservative limbaugh freaks beat ya to it.:)
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
It is an interesting burb that those turkeys let loose with... I can't wait till Rumsberb starts double shifting his way to masked credibility.... It is still just the tip of the Moonberg and what is too come if it does should proove interesting.

In this case Loose bergs may simply melt away and be assimilated into the vast Atlantic.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY