- Jun 5, 2000
- 36,410
- 616
- 126
So he said "talk slut" and the thread title is misleading. BAN.
stfu the title is not misleading.
So he said "talk slut" and the thread title is misleading. BAN.
On his Tuesday radio program, liberal talker and MSNBC host Ed Schultz took a shot at conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham for her criticism of President Barack Obamas trip to Ireland, where he enjoyed a Guinness, while the Midwestern United States was being hit by severe weather. (h/t Brian Maloney, the Radio Equalizer)
And what do the Republicans thinking about? Schultz said. Theyre not thinking about their next-door neighbor. Theyre just thinking about how much this is going to cost. President Obama is going to be visiting Joplin, Mo., on Sunday but you know what theyre talking about, like this right-wing slut, whats her name?, Laura Ingraham? Yeah, shes a talk slut. You see, she was, back in the day, praising President Reagan when he was drinking a beer overseas. But now that Obamas doing it, theyre working him over.
She is, and she is an ultra-conservative Catholic girl - rather the opposite of a slut.I like her, she is controversial, but I think she is such a cutie![]()
She is, and she is an ultra-conservative Catholic girl - rather the opposite of a slut.
<snip>
Don't know many catholic girls do ya?
()![]()
stfu the title is not misleading.
He's talking about the difference between what states put in to the federal treasury and what they take out of it. Red states are by and large federal welfare cases that the rich blue states support.
This is ironic.
"talk slut" is the quote. You removed the talk and kept the slut thereby changing the meaning of what he was saying.
I like her, she is controversial, but I think she is such a cutie![]()
"Talk Slut"?
I've been hearing he called a her a "right wing slut".
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...ight-wing-slut/2011/05/26/AGOcV2BH_story.html
Fern
He used both phrases."Talk Slut"?
I've been hearing he called a her a "right wing slut".
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...ight-wing-slut/2011/05/26/AGOcV2BH_story.html
Fern
Anybody want to take bets on when NOW will issue a statement of condemnation?
ps - he's suspended.
but but but I thought NOW represented all women?![]()
He used both phrases.
Despite the rationalizations, I don't see how the modifier negates the misogyny.
Slut literally refers to promiscuity sexually. He clearly was not saying that.
Talk slut, right wing slut, corporate slut, the modified versions refer to having low standards for who she will 'get in bed with' politically.
So, Tom DeLay was a political slut for selling not only his personal support but all of the House's to the highest bidder - men who ran slave labor factories.
It negates the misogyny in that it's about her politics and not her gender. But as I said above, because it has *overtones* as a gender insult, it's a poor choice for a woman.
The slut/whore/prostitute analogy serves well to describe the behavior of some pundits and politicians, but because they have a core of 'misogyny', are best avoided.
There are times and contexts, when they are clearly not intended as misogynistic, you might defend their use, but they're crude regardless.
"talk slut" is the quote. You removed the talk and kept the slut thereby changing the meaning of what he was saying.
Slut literally refers to promiscuity sexually. He clearly was not saying that.
Talk slut, right wing slut, corporate slut, the modified versions refer to having low standards for who she will 'get in bed with' politically.
So, Tom DeLay was a political slut for selling not only his personal support but all of the House's to the highest bidder - men who ran slave labor factories.
It negates the misogyny in that it's about her politics and not her gender. But as I said above, because it has *overtones* as a gender insult, it's a poor choice for a woman.
The slut/whore/prostitute analogy serves well to describe the behavior of some pundits and politicians, but because they have a core of 'misogyny', are best avoided.
There are times and contexts, when they are clearly not intended as misogynistic, you might defend their use, but they're crude regardless.
