MSI Neo2 Platinum Memory Timings

rickcfer

Junior Member
Oct 25, 2004
11
0
0
I own the Neo2 Platinum and just as the recently bashed Epox board the memory timings default to DDR 333 when all four (4) dimms are filled. How did Anand get around this? It's documented in their manual.
 

Aries64

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2004
1,030
0
0
I own the Neo2 Platinum and just as the recently bashed Epox board the memory timings default to DDR 333 when all four (4) dimms are filled. How did Anand get around this? It's documented in their manual.

Which Neo2 Platinum are you talking about. 915P Neo2 Platinum, 865PE Neo2 Platinum, or K8N Neo2 Platinum? You need to be specific and let other members know your system specs so we have a reference point to start at. I only have experience with the K8N Neo2 Platinum. That said:

I don't know if Anandtech actually had to "work around" this issue when they did their "Socket 939 Roundup: Battle at the Top" review back in July (2004). When AT tested the K8N Neo2 Platinum they used either Mushkin PC3500 Level II (no longer in production) or OCZ PC3500 Platinum Ltd. and achieved tight 2-2-2-10 1T timing completely stable.

As noted, the Command Rate had to be set at 2T WHEN FILLING ALL FOUR MEMORY SLOTS. This is due to the greater stress placed on the memory subsystem with all slots filled. Here is a link to the "Overclocking and Stress Testing" section of the write-up on the K8N Neo2 Platinum:

http://www.anandtech.com/mb/sh...c.aspx?i=2128&p=11

Hope this helps, but like I said your need to be specific about your hardware for others to be able to help you. Notice that I am the only one who responded to this post and your other post with the same content in "MSI Neo2 Plat Memory Problems"?

I'm not trying to be snippy, but that is the way it works. Good luck.
 

rickcfer

Junior Member
Oct 25, 2004
11
0
0
Points well taken. The motherboard is th K8N Neo2 Platinum with a Athlon 64 3500+ cpu. The memory is Corsair XLS 3200 pro( 4 512 Mb modules). I tried setting it to DDR 400 at 2T timings and the board did not post until I removed 2 dimms. It is kinda mute now because the board was RMA'd due to "chipset not found" at post.
 

Aries64

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2004
1,030
0
0
Points well taken. The motherboard is th K8N Neo2 Platinum with a Athlon 64 3500+ cpu. The memory is Corsair XLS 3200 pro( 4 512 Mb modules). I tried setting it to DDR 400 at 2T timings and the board did not post until I removed 2 dimms. It is kinda mute now because the board was RMA'd due to "chipset not found" at post.

rickcfer

So you've got the K8N Neo2 also - now it makes perfect sense that you were wondering how AT got around the memory timing defaulting to DDR333 WITH ALL SLOTS FILLED, as you said - MSI has this documented in their own manual. Strange.

Anyway, I seemed to recall that when I was running four sticks of Mushkin PC3500 Level II in my board (K8N Neo2 Platinum) I could MANUALLY set max memory speed to 200MHz at 2-2-2-5 and the board would default to 2T Command Rate. So, this afternoon I re-installed another Mushkin PC3500 Level II DualPack (512MBx2) in my machine. I then ran CPU-Z v1.24 and the "Memory and Cache Bandwidth Benchmark" under SANDRA 2004. CPU-Z showed 2048MB in Dual Channel at 2-2-2-5. Strangely, for some reason SANDRA 2004 shows my memory as only 1 Channel of 2x 200MHz (400MHz data rate) in a 4-Way Bank Interleave of all four banks (0, 1, 2, and 3).

I don't know if your new board (assuming you get a "new" board) will be able to run all four sticks at DDR400, which it should (albeit at 2T Command Rate). Mine does as did the AT test board. If not, at least the new board you get should be trouble-free. If you're lucky you may even get a later revision board, which is usually a good thing due to problems found on first revisions of boards being ironed-out in later revisions.

Lastly, as AT stated in their review, all of the 939 boards they tested, if they could even run with all banks filled had to run at 2T Command Rate, which have a significant negative effect on memory benchmarks. My system will freeze on the third run of the Halo timedemo when running 512MBx4 of the PC3500 Level II Mushkin at 2-2-2-5 2T (no OC). I also notice a speed difference when playing online multiplayer Halo, which is why I pulled 1GB of memory out of my machine before. I'm gonna pull it back out again now that I've re-confirmed that my board DOES run 512MBx4 at 200MHz Dual Channel.

Please post back and let me know how it works out with your new board. Good luck.