MSI K7T-Pro2A vs MSI K7T-Pro2

[err]

The only difference is that ATA 100 vs ATA 66 Support, am I right ?

Is this THE ONLY difference? If so, I am going to get the K7T-Pro2 then. I don't need ATA100 support as of yet.

Thanks for any input

eRr

 

[compuwiz1]

That's the only difference I can see, the 686b southbridge adding ata100 support.

 

[err]

so if I'd like to save a couple bucks and go with the K7T-PRO2 version, overclockability & performace should be just the same right ?

I built a system with the K7T-PRO before. It was excellent. However I believe PRO2 has much more added benefits compared to K7T-PRO.

Thanks for the comment compuwiz 🙂

eRr

 

[Henry Kuo]

i would say it is just as good, if not better.

 

[compuwiz1]

Henry, damn...do you ever sleep? You must be a bot. 😉

 

[err]

henry and compuwiz... damn.. you both are the same ... 🙂

Thanks for the comment though. I appreciate it.
Henry how is your IIS / Web server project coming up ? 🙂

eRr

 

[Henry Kuo]

oh well, on average i sleep about 3 to 4 hrs a day.... so don't be surprised if you see me in some weird hours 🙂 after all, Anand and Matt are just as weird, heee... (think about it, I finished my roundup at 2am PST, and Anand and Matt could still help to edit and post the stuff... It's 5am for them man...)

Ah... the project... major obstacle... it's coz' of you guys! heee, just kidding. I'd really love to have one, but currently I am just too busy with so many things around me (AT, class, research, teaching...) But I really appreciate all the help you guys gave me, I am slowly preparing things 🙂

 

[ZoSo]

I read somewhere that VIA made improvments to the "B" chip, besides adding ATA100, I'll see if I can find the article, I read it awhile ago though.