MSI GeForce4 MX440 - First Look @ t-break w/benches. BACK UP NOW

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MisterDuck

Member
Nov 3, 2001
177
0
0
Eh...looks to me like they're reviewing a half completed product. It seems like the drivers are very immature and have a lot of room for improvement - I'm willing to bet that this card will whip a geforce3 ti 200, but not with those cruddy drivers....

The overclocking was impressive. =)

if the drivers were fixed, and the scored were better than the ti 200, then I'd pay the (estimated) $175 that they said the card would cost.



One thing - is this card DX8 compatible? It didn't indicate anywhere that it was....does anyone know?
 

RoninSBS

Junior Member
Sep 10, 2001
6
0
0
Some of these will have dual DVI. Not the mention full MPEG-2 hardware decoder. Sweet :)

To roughly give you an idea of MX 640 performance, here is MX 440 oc 300/480 bench. MX 640 will run @ 300/550, so add 10% to these numbers.
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
3
81
Yea I meant the GF2MX400 of course, heh. Still, I think it would be interesting to see the budget cards duke it out.
 

Rand

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,071
1
81


<<

One thing - is this card DX8 compatible? It didn't indicate anywhere that it was....does anyone know?
>>



No it isnt.
The GF4 MX is based on the NV17 core. It's more of a mix of the GF2/3.
 

kuk

Platinum Member
Jul 20, 2000
2,925
0
0


<<

<<

One thing - is this card DX8 compatible? It didn't indicate anywhere that it was....does anyone know?
>>



No it isnt.
The GF4 MX is based on the NV17 core. It's more of a mix of the GF2/3.
>>



I dunno ... from the article that Anand posted a few months back, he mentioned the NV17M (the mobile part), not the NV17 (desktop). Maybe they crippled only the mobile version of the NV17. But that's a wild guess.
 

Rand

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,071
1
81
The NV17 (GF4 MX) is a DirectX7 part.
It has limited vertex shader capabilities, it has the GF2's T&L engine, the 'crossbar' memory architecture of the GF3.
Only two pixel pipelines and the associated 2 texels/pipeline rather then the 4 that the GF2 (non-MX), GF3, and GF4 has.
It does support the GF3's 'Quincunx' FSAA implementation, along with the GF1/2's 2X and 4X SuperSampled FSAA implementation.

Think of it as a cross between the GF2 MX and the GF3.