Cutterhead
Senior member
- Jul 13, 2005
- 527
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
So wait, If I sell you a stolen car that was stolen by someone else who stole it from a dealership, It's ok because I just "didn't know"?
It's still illegal to sell stolen goods.
I'm not a lawyer, but yes... I am fairly certain the law regarding the fencing of stolen goods has some clauses to address this, in that you must knowingly be selling/purchasing stolen or "hot" items in order to be culpable. Otherwise, like Slick5150 said, you would have retail and 3rd and 4th hand vendors implicated who, to their knowledge, were purchasing from a reputable 2nd hand source (who is in fact the real party to blame for purchasing the stolen goods).
For example, if you purchase a new home theater system with a retail value of $2,000 for only, say $300, and it turns out to be stolen... your culpability would depend on the source from where you purchased the item. If you bought it at Best Buy (or woot.com in this case), a reputable retailer, and you receive a receipt... well then your culpability is just about zero. However, if you bought the system at a pawn shop or out of some guy's van, then there may be evidence for a case against you. There were obvious conditions present that would reasonably rouse suspicion as to the origins of the goods.
The same concept applies from woot's perspective. If woot purchased the video cards from a vendor with whom they had previously conducted business, and formed an established record of legitimate transactions (as their update implies), then I don't see how they could be held accountable for this. Likewise, if they acquired these cards through unusual channels then they will have some explaining to do. Let law enforcement figure it out.