In reality, what is that any of use for?
If I am viewing portrait mode, it most likely be in my hands, like viewing typical books and documents. I don't see the need to have this designed for this one specific purpose.
Compare to the now variable kickstand on landscape mode. Reasons being, is that when writing or drawing like an easel, there is much more "horizontal" space to rest and move around in and very seldom one would move their hands vertical. It is more versatile in a traditional laptop manner (which the design team is going for in multi-functional design tackling).
A landscape kickstand, is also more structurally stable in a thin form than using that very same hinge mechanism and kickstand thinness on a now taller form.
But the fixed kickstand still basically limits you to landscape, no?It's about time they made it a little less widescreen so it's better to use in portrait mode.
I dunno, reading AT's blog now... I'd still rather have two devices that perform their task great vs one that does both OK (or even good). I don't have anything against MS's direction and I think some day the devices will all be unified but it doesn't look like we are there yet with the SP3. Just a little closer I suppose.
Completely depends on the user -- I see PC's, phones, tablets all just as web browsers now basically. I do zero photoshop, 3D work, word processing, etc... just games on my desktop and internet/netflix on everything else. My work computer is a Windows 7 desktop connected to three screens. Its not like a surface will help me there.
Word on the street seems to be the i5 is a 4300U, the i7 is a 4500U.
They've also dropped the Wacom digitizer for some other manufacturer.
I think if you need a 12" screen, like Zaap, who uses it for scripts, then it's a good purchase.
But as a Surface Pro 1 owner, I can't find a good enough reason to upgrade. I can't imagine a SP2 owner wanting to do so either. Unless you need that 12" screen, of course.
Is the lack of updates for the Surface 2 Windows RT product another sign that the OS platform is slowly dying?
This is more exciting and interesting than Apple events now.
Watching the Surface presentation really makes you appreciate the work Apple puts in their presentations. Damn it was dreadful to watch.
Watching the Surface presentation really makes you appreciate the work Apple puts in their presentations. Damn it was dreadful to watch.
I'm in for one. Going to be nice to be able to trash my stacks of legal pads and have immediate access to all my notes for all my clients all the time on the SP3 and on my phone. Going with the pad/pen form factor was a genius move. Glad they got away from 16x9 for this.
EDIT: assuming the i5 is a 4300U, the i7 is a 4500U, comparing these chips on the Intel ARK site suggests that the i5 is not a huge drop off. I was sold on the i7 option but comparing the chips side by side suggests that the real world difference will be slight, and the i5 actually supports some features that the i7 doesn't. Any thoughts on this point?
But the Surface presentation hit it with actual product demonstration and mention of capability. But again, it comes to what you are expecting.
I wouldn't purchase the i7 256GB over the i5 256GB.
Now if you need the 512GB of storage...
Does anyone have experience with Surface Pro's in a business environment? Dell has really been lame lately and I've been thinking of trying some of my people on Surface Pro's but the warranty aspect gives me pause. Will they swap a Surface Pro out at a store if you have the complete warranty?
I want to make sure I get this right.
Are you saying that you don't believe that Apple presentations have enough "actual product demonstration and mention of capability" during them?
