- May 7, 2002
- 10,371
- 762
- 126
This is perhaps the dumbest thing Mozilla has ever done.
They have the ability to force-push whatever they want, and they dare say this was done to "protect privacy"?
Seriously?
They BREAK user privacy themselves, to prove that they could, so users will know better to protect privacy?
Such BS.
Whomever thought this was a good idea needs to resign.
There is no other way to fix this massive blunder that they did.
They have the ability to force-push whatever they want, and they dare say this was done to "protect privacy"?
Seriously?
They BREAK user privacy themselves, to prove that they could, so users will know better to protect privacy?
Such BS.
Whomever thought this was a good idea needs to resign.
There is no other way to fix this massive blunder that they did.
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/ne...after-force-installing-mr-robot-promo-add-on/Mozilla Angers Firefox Users After Force-Installing Mr. Robot Promo Add-On
Mozilla took a bit of heat this week after the organization force-installed a Mr. Robot promotional add-on in some Firefox browsers.
The add-on, called Looking Glass, was intended to promote the season 3 finale of Mr. Robot that aired on Wednesday, December 13, but the whole media stunt failed miserably.
Instead, users were extremely ticked off that Mozilla had the audacity to push a promo add-on without permission in their browsers [1, 2, 3].
The ones that weren't pissed off were confused, as the add-on had a cryptic name and description, and it took a lot of googling to figure out what the new add-on was about.
Mozilla admits to media stunt
"Firefox and Mr Robot have collaborated on a shared experience to further your immersion into the Mr Robot universe, also known as an Alternate Reality Game (ARG)," Mozilla explained in a knowledge article.
"The Mr. Robot series centers around the theme of online privacy and security. One of the 10 guiding principles of Mozilla's mission is that individuals' security and privacy on the internet are fundamental and must not be treated as optional. The more people know about what information they are sharing online, the more they can protect their privacy," Mozilla also added, trying to explain its decision.