K Krassus Golden Member Jan 30, 2003 1,153 0 0 Sep 27, 2003 #1 Has anyone else tried comparing 128k WMA to 160k MP3? Which sounds better to you? I'm leaning towards WMA.
Has anyone else tried comparing 128k WMA to 160k MP3? Which sounds better to you? I'm leaning towards WMA.
P pennylane Diamond Member Apr 28, 2002 6,077 1 0 Sep 27, 2003 #5 Originally posted by: Heisenberg Ogg pwns both of them. Click to expand... Agreed. Though if I had space I'd go FLAC or monkey's audio.
Originally posted by: Heisenberg Ogg pwns both of them. Click to expand... Agreed. Though if I had space I'd go FLAC or monkey's audio.
M MercenaryForHire Lifer Jan 31, 2002 40,819 2 0 Sep 27, 2003 #6 Originally posted by: fanerman91 Originally posted by: Heisenberg Ogg pwns both of them. Click to expand... Agreed. Though if I had space I'd go FLAC or monkey's audio. Click to expand... **confirmed** Lossy = OGG Lossless = FLAC or APE - M4H
Originally posted by: fanerman91 Originally posted by: Heisenberg Ogg pwns both of them. Click to expand... Agreed. Though if I had space I'd go FLAC or monkey's audio. Click to expand... **confirmed** Lossy = OGG Lossless = FLAC or APE - M4H
P Paulson Elite Member Feb 27, 2001 10,689 0 0 www.ifixidevices.com Sep 27, 2003 #7 I'm too lazy to convert to any other type of encoding these days... mp3 still gets the job done.