• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mozilla is finally adding a worthwhile feature to Firefox

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It's a useful feature, but it noticeably slows down the browser as it checks every website you go to against a whitelist. However if you already have a good third party AV/Firewall solution then you don't need it.

Although it may use a whitelist first certain things I believe it also maintains a blacklist of known bad sites as well. Also a good AV/Firewall is not a replacement for SmartScreen, they protect against different things and I would recommend keeping SmartScreen (or Google Safe Browsing depending on your browser) enabled.
 
Although it may use a whitelist first certain things I believe it also maintains a blacklist of known bad sites as well. Also a good AV/Firewall is not a replacement for SmartScreen, they protect against different things and I would recommend keeping SmartScreen (or Google Safe Browsing depending on your browser) enabled.

All of the good AV/Firewall software nowadays come with anti phishing and malware blocking technology (including URLs), so smart screen is just added redundancy.. However, as I said on the last page, added redundancy can cost you in terms of performance.

If you're fine with sacrificing performance for more security, then go right ahead. Personally, I have limits on what I'm willing to accept. It's the same reason why I don't run Bitdefender, despite it being one of the most highly rated AV/Firewall suites on the market. I tried it, and it had a very heavy footprint on my system wherein it substantially slowed down browsing, and the performance of certain programs.

Norton offers similar or better protection, yet has a much lighter footprint so that's what I use personally. Although I'm thinking about trying out Webroot, as it has the smallest footprint of all of them yet supposedly still has excellent protection..

That said, safe browsing habits and common sense will protect you just as much as a good AV/Firewall solution will.
 
Back
Top