- Apr 9, 2013
- 4,470
- 0
- 0
It's saddening that people actually think this kind of witch hunt is a good thing. Goodbye sweet America.
By all means: defend one who is part of The Problem, and not those victimized by his ilk.
It's saddening that people actually think this kind of witch hunt is a good thing. Goodbye sweet America.
Yeah, what you are referring to came about in 1964, rather than the time the constitution was framed, and it in fact IS illegal for private enterprise discriminate against "protected classes" (including sexual orientation, per later caselaw) Again, it seems you may be confused about the legal aspect of the topic on hand and come in heavy on the emotional appeal.
By all means: defend one who is part of The Problem, and not those victimized by his ilk.
I honestly asked him what country he was from because I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt that he was from a non-English speaking country. Most of what he has written in this thread is incomprehensible and overly simplistic.
I thought maybe his command of the English language was just poor and that we should cut him some slack. Then when he chimed in with "our founding fathers" it blew that theory out of the water. I guess I'll fall back on that he's simply young, stupid, and incapable of critical thought.
The alternative, that he is an English-speaking adult with a fully developed mind, is too scary for me to accept.
This is NOT about THE MAINSTREAM. This about not endorsing, and railing against actual evil as consumers with free speech, a luminous, mostly intact American privilege, as per our FOUNDERS.
Again, all species of bigotry are the same, the given categorical target is moot. And all species are equally evil.
Even in my famously progressive city, violent hate crimes still abound.
Now, you clueless humans here attacking me....
I don't like your beliefs and want you fired.
As someone directly impacted by his viewpoints, I think this is incredibly wrong and an example of reverse bullying/mob mentality.
If his viewpoints impacted mozilla products or culture at all, sure, but they don't and this sets a very, very dangerous standard that I am not comfortable with at all.
Because you're a fuckwit who should be fired for your beliefs.
I would. If his views don't affect the product/service he heads, I don't care. If he was head the NAACP. and a Grand Dragon, I'd have a problem with it, but rarely do opposing interests converge like that.
Even then, unless he's using his position as a platform to spread the stuff, I don't see a problem.
Are we gonna start firing people because they like asian fart porn in their spare time?
I mean, how can we allow baby murderers in a civilized society? Where's the equality for the unborn?
Yep and you're one in a thousand, at the least.
Everyone that doesn't like asian fart porn all the time should be fired.
I can't tell if you've ignored my point or just don't buy it, so here's another one. If, instead of dying, Fred Phelps had just been appointed Mozilla's CEO, would your opinion change any? How about if Kim Jong-un had a capitalist conversion and wanted to the job instead? What if Joseph Goebbels was thrown through a time warp and wanted to work for Twitter from prison?
Practically every single person has a limit to their tolerance, where's yours?
Everyone that doesn't like asian fart porn all the time should be fired.
The US government hired like 99% of all Nazi scientists after the war...
Get back to me when you adopt or subsidize one of the infinite, doomed unwanted babies who did get born to humans in no way capable of parenting.
I will then grant you CERT.
Let's cut to the chase. I care less about Eich 's viewpoint or, the actions of his employees or, internet "backlash " than, I wonder how many bazillion dollars Eich will pocket for his vast contributions to Mozilla.