• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

movie review: super size me

dolph

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2001
3,981
0
0
yes, it's a gross exaggeration. he wound up eating about 5000 calories a day, limited his walking to ~4000 steps a day (about 1/2 mile, equiv to the avg american), and ate breakfast, lunch & dinner there. had to try everything once, and had to supersize the meal only if offered.

but it was still well done. the part i liked best was about how kids are specifically targeted and given poor food choices in school, but when asked, the administrators "want kids to make the right decision." right, when their options are lays, twinkies, pizza, french fries, cookies, high-sugar juices, etc. it had a definite anti-coprorate feel to it, but with the way junk (ok, empty-calorie) food is marketed to kids, it's hard to defend the companies as just trying to do their best to make a buck.

as far as how his health was affected: he went from 185.5lbs to 210, or thereabouts, in a month. one week he went from 203 to 202, but that almost certainly had to have been from when his muscle tissue loss exceeded his fat gain. he had bi-weekly blood tests by 3 different doctors, all of which urged him to stop the whole time. i also saw it with a gastroenterologist, who confirmed that everything they said was absolutely true.

on principle, i don't agree with the anti-tobacco, anti-fast food lawsuits. (the fast food lawsuits seemed to have been the inspiration for this movie.) everyone should know it's bad for you, and if you don't, then as a society we're probably better off when you die from stupidity-related factors. but it's still more than a little sickening that hundreds of thousands of people die a year from preventable causes, and that much worse that companies know it and make billions of dollars from the average person's lack of willpower. i don't have a solution, i would just wish there was an easy way for companies to be moral while still turning a buck. ok, maybe not quite like that, but i wish people would exercise more self control (and exercise more in general, too :p).

overall score:
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup: out of :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
ah the david blaine of fast food. wonder how long it'll take to reach dvd. i just want to gawk at the spectacle of his stupidity.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
ah the david blaine of fast food. wonder how long it'll take to reach dvd. i just want to gawk at the spectacle of his stupidity.
You must admit it's kind of funny :)
 

monk3y

Lifer
Jun 12, 2001
12,699
0
76
I'm pretty interested in seeing it. I'm just gonna wait for it to be released on DVD or tape.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
I can't imagine that abusing yourself to that degree for a mere 30 days would result in a really significant degree of liver damage. Afterall many people eat like that for decades on end, and though they may have liver damage, it must be fairly slow to build up.
"[Spurlock's] liver damage was so severe that one of his physicians . . . worried that [he] would succumb to liver failure before the month was over," the Foundation said in the statement. "Though [the movie] is not a controlled, scientific experiment, the [Foundation] believes that it presents an important first step in a necessary national dialogue."
Yeah, sounds like this guy was unhealthy to begin with.
 

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
The guy was in great health when he started. He weighed about 180 lb and had just 11% body fat..which balooned up to 18% by the end.

And this is a repost :)
 

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
You're right... The way that the food industry packs food with crap (i.e. trans fats, high fructose corn syrup, etc.) is disgusting. Yes, people should know better. But often times it seems as though you are eating healthy (i.e. "non-fat" mayo), but you aren't.

As for kids not having good food choices in school, that's easily repairable for a good parent... Be there in the A.M. to make your kids lunch.
 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
What he did to his liver isn't a great idea, but IIRC it's not permanent. The liver was saturated with the fatty wastes, if he resumes a healthy diet, it's likely he'll recover.
 

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
Not sure if you hit the quote button right after he edited it, but the grammar is fine there.
 

Ready

Golden Member
Jan 16, 2003
1,830
0
0
The sad part is this is what I ate every day when I was in high school.

Leftover whooper or big mac for breakfast. Fastfood from school for lunch and more burgers for dinner.
I kept that up for 2 years in high school and 3 years in college and never didn't gain any weight.

Strangely I didn't gain weight until I started engineering.
 

DanJ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
3,509
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I can't imagine that abusing yourself to that degree for a mere 30 days would result in a really significant degree of liver damage. Afterall many people eat like that for decades on end, and though they may have liver damage, it must be fairly slow to build up.
"[Spurlock's] liver damage was so severe that one of his physicians . . . worried that [he] would succumb to liver failure before the month was over," the Foundation said in the statement. "Though [the movie] is not a controlled, scientific experiment, the [Foundation] believes that it presents an important first step in a necessary national dialogue."
Yeah, sounds like this guy was unhealthy to begin with.
Thats what kind of made it have more impact. The guy was in near perfect shape; they tested him extensively before hand.

Quite a good documentary. Yes, it was to the extreme, but it had more to say then simply McD's is bad. The OP here is right, the parts about what kids eat at school was quite bad. Administrators saying "I'm sure they brought a bag lunch as well" when kids would order all fries..of course the kids just ate fries (no bag lunch, though one did bring in a Cok). Turning a blind eye to the problem assuming they're brining all kinds of nutrious food from home. Also funny that the some of the food service companies that handle schools are the same that handle jails.

It does make you think about the health effects. Obviously fast food is bad but the film has more to say then just that.

3.5 out of 4 stars for me.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: Ready
The sad part is this is what I ate every day when I was in high school.

Leftover whooper or big mac for breakfast. Fastfood from school for lunch and more burgers for dinner.
I kept that up for 2 years in high school and 3 years in college and never didn't gain any weight.

Strangely I didn't gain weight until I started engineering.

Hell, I did the same thing in college and that's not even counting the beers. If I tried to do that these days I would probably blow up like a balloon.
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
There has also been other people that did the same thing but actually were active and didn't sit around on purpose and some of them actually lost weight. So it just goes to prove it's not the food, it the fact that most of the 300+ pound people that eat at McDonalds also just sit around all day and do nothing for their body.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
There has also been other people that did the same thing but actually were active and didn't sit around on purpose and some of them actually lost weight. So it just goes to prove it's not the food, it the fact that most of the 300+ pound people that eat at McDonalds also just sit around all day and do nothing for their body.

I wonder how much harder someone would have to work to 'lose weight' on a diet like the one this guy went through. I'll stick to what I'm eating, thanks. :p
 

DanJ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
3,509
0
0
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
There has also been other people that did the same thing but actually were active and didn't sit around on purpose and some of them actually lost weight. So it just goes to prove it's not the food, it the fact that most of the 300+ pound people that eat at McDonalds also just sit around all day and do nothing for their body.

Well, he also talks about the amount of food McD's and the like gives. I saw an article on someone who did lose weight, but she didn't go with the finish the plate mentality that this guy does; thus their daily caloric intake was way different (~4800 versus ~2000). The film talks about how the chains started off with only one size fries, drinks, etc..and those sizes are now declared "Kiddy" or "Small." McD's obviously must think its an acceptable amount of food; so he's testing that assumption.

The amount of steps he was allowed to take were based on a national average; though I suppose the average American is probably overweight.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
He was on daily show and he has already lost all the weight. He seemed like a pretty cool guy just out to prove a point (and make a buck).

I do agree that kids have it worst. Everything from fruit snacks to juice drinks is horribly mis-labeled as healthy.