Motherboard/CPU Combo $24.99AR + $7.00 Shipping

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mitch101

Senior member
Feb 5, 2007
767
0
0
www.InteriorLiving.com
Last edited by a moderator:

JDJr

Member
Oct 2, 2000
134
0
0
I got one last time they were on sale to make a IP Cop machine. Seems to work ok for that.
I read that a few people use them for CarPCs too.

JDJr
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Welcome to 2001 :p

Too bad these use DDR and not DDR2.

The GOAL3+ is basically a socket 754 Sempron CPU/mobo.

The Samuel (I think "Samual" is misspelled even on the PCChips site) is a VIA C3 800MHz chip. This is similar to the low end mini ITX "Eden" boards CPU-wise. It is Flex ATX, which is between micro ATX and mini ITX in size. This can make for a super budget board to get into mini computing, such as building your own NAS, router, etc. It can be used in any Flex ATX, micro ATX or regular ATX case, and uses regular ATX power supplies.

As for the CPU itself... I have no idea how they managed to call it a 2000+, because at the nominal 800MHz it was still much less performance than a Celeron 800MHz back when the C3 800 was released in 2001. I've owned quite a few C3 chips and still have a couple in my desk drawer (C3 866 Ezra), mobos all leaked caps and died though I still have a few of those as well. VIA claims that the 800MHz Samuel 2 is only 13W TDP. BTW, it is basically a socket 370 setup (w/o the socket) while the Samuel 3 (Ezra) is under 10W. The 800MHz Ezra core was featured in a video made by VIA showing it running Quake 3 Arena for hours on end... without a fan OR heatsink attached. So, everyone going "oooh, ahhh" over the VIA Nano running without a heatsink are just CPU n00bs in my book. :evil:

As cool as ice! (video link, right click and save to HDD)

Wikipedia list of C3 processors

Review of the C3 Ezra chip (Ezra was the Samuel 3, a die shrink of the Samuel 2)

Review of the PCChips combo

EDIT: For nostalgia sake I just dug out all my VIA processors and took a picture:

four Ezra chips


The one on the upper left all covered in white heatsink goop and with a very discolored heatspreader (passive cooling was rough on it) is a C3 933A on a Soyo VIA 694 chipset board (bulging caps, only POSTs sometimes). The one at the bottom is a VIA C3 866A in an original Shuttle SV24 using a VIA PLE133 chipset (I think, many bulging caps and no longer POSTs). The top right chip is a VIA C3 800A on a Shuttle VIA 694T chipset board (scratch over PCB traces, barely works at lowest FSB). The chip on the blue tray is a brand new VIA C3 800A sitting on an MSI VIA 266 chipset board with DDR and DDR2 support. Of course the board is very flakey and has tons of bulging caps. The rogue chip next to the new C3 is an Intel Celeron 366 - my last "unsold" one from back when I sold these "pretested" at 550MHz.
 

purduecmpe

Member
Jan 1, 2007
39
0
0
Now if this were one of those new VIA Nano chips in the mini itx 2.0 form factor with the nVidia GPU they announced at Computex that would be a HOT DEAL!! They were playing Crysis on that thing!!! Crysis on a VIA CPU! WOOT WOOT!
 

Mitch101

Senior member
Feb 5, 2007
767
0
0
www.InteriorLiving.com
I actually have this mobo which is even slower than the one posted.
http://www.tigerdirect.com/app...tive.asp?Sku=S452-1001

It has a previous generation VIA C3 Samuel2 1.3 Giga Pro processor and it runs Windows 2003 server with a mere 256megs of ram. It was previously an XP machine. It took a long time to install the software but I have a KVM and just switch between my main rig and this. I never bothered to install any of the drivers that came with the mobo just went generic from what the OS installs. Boot time can take a few mins but once its up it does ok. Windows updates take a year and a day but it happens at 4am automatically. By the time I get up its installed and ready for a reboot.

As a single purpose mail/web/ftp server it does very well considering its age and lack of memory. Ram for the box nearly costs more than this mobo and if you already have a stick of DDR lying around heck like I said 2003 Server runs on 256megs of ram.

If your someone just looking for a Linux test or Windows box you can leave on all the time this is not a bad little machine you wont feel guilty about leaving it on round the clock.

We all would like to think we need much more CPU power for a home server that wont do much more than serve a handful of people at most. If you need a step more go with the Goal3+ that will actually be plenty and probably run a few VM's decently while your at it. Heck I would put Windows server 2008 on the GOAL3+ combo and maybe do a little Hyper-V.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.