Most spectacular failure in video card history

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: kmmatney
You should include ATIs original "crossfire", the Rage Maxx in your poll. That one was pretty bad.

The worst video cards I've ever owned, in terms of being total failures, was the Voodoo Rage, and the Diamond Stealth II (Verite). Both cards were absolutely awful.

I know the MAXX was close, but I liked it, warts and all.

It's actually in a list of my all time favorite cards, as are the V5 and 5800U.
 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
at best you could say it was only a failure on the scale of nv30... there were, after all both failures which were "cool" for design as well as appearance.

Um quick note: you say "at best you could say it was only a failure on the scale of nv30".. how can you say this, when NV30 lead to some later FX cards which were not bad (5900XT and 5950U) IMO as well as the ATI punishing NV40 series. As well as the day of reckoning for ATI fanboys everywhere, G70.

reread: i was talking about the maxx....

and your reasoning regarding nv30 i already covered in an earlier post.

 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: Turtle 1
Actually its was an offical score done with 2 x850xtpe . So where do you get your info from Rollo I can't quit remember the scores but it was 15,500+ It was done at that hugh O/C bash ATI threw . other than sli ATI has owned nvidia since the R300 release .

really? what have they had to compete with the g70 the last 3-4 months (single or sli)?

Ati has not ans. the G70 yet but when it does ATI claim to the fastestest single card setup will stand from the R300 to the present. Now Asus is ready to release a dual core 7800 as a single card I bet your the type that thinks that should count. Crossfire has already taken the crown in X850 and 6800 Ultra class.

i certainly find it of interest you make a statement then contradict yourself in the very next paragraph ;).

crossfire hasn't "taken" anything yet... but again it's funny that on one hand, we can't really judge crossfire's place in this poll because it's not really released, but on the hand we can say it's the best? fanboy logic is amazingly ignorant.
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
LOL

Spank spank spank!

Proposed specs of unavailable products!

Whack whack whack!


parody?

That was not parody. I said the thread was parody. It seems that it is in retaliation for another post. Once again everyone has retaliated, yeah it is wrong; do you want me to tell everyone who does something like that that they were wrong or something?

-Kevin


Actually that was meant to be parody Kevin. I was replying to 5150 Joker who had posted something about "Wake me when ATI stops paper launching products that aren't available for five months", and I was implying we're all like kids with pRon in regard to ATIs paper launches, glomming onto any hint of leaked info like this years SI Swimsuit Issue in a prison.
[/quote]

Point well taken!
 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: Rollo

2. I note you didn't respond to my request for links on ATI taking back the "performance crown". I haven't seen any leaked benches of their upcoming products that support this, do you have some, or are you speculating?
I think everyone would like to see the basis of your position if you've seen some offshore leaked benches?
My position is not based on anything except a hunch, and the precedents that have come before throughout the history of PC graphics.

like ati being at the bottom of the rung in every generation prior to the release of r300? one of the main reasons r300 was so cool is that it wsa a new design and didn't follow the "raise clockspeeds for better performance" theory that nvidia had used since geforce256.

given that ati is now following the same premise (at least until r600) and have had issues with bleedthrough and thermal issues, i find it illogical to assume it will be faster simply becuase "it's the next gen product".

Any time ATI or Nvidia come out with a new high end card, it always trumps the previously released high end card from the competitor. Even if it's only by a little. That's just the way things work and you know that. ATI would not be releasing this card (months late even) if they did not know that it would perform better than the 7800GTX. It would be a huge egg in their face. So I feel safe with my guess that the X1800XT will at the very least win most benchmarks... enough so that it is considered the new performance leader.
they're releasing (at least on paper) crossfire months late despite it's obvious fallbacks. given your reasoning, why don't they just wait and release a better version with x1800?

 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: BigfootKevin
Too many comments to read....but


How is crossfire a failure? It's not even released to the public yet, and we haven't even seen it perform with their new gen of cards.

Perhaps I should have been more specific and said X800 Crossfire.

It's a failure because it has one of the most laughable built in hardware limitations in history built in- the 16X12 60Hz limit.

So, no one would be dumb enough to buy it.

LOL.. since when has intelligence had anything to do with what card anyone purchases? if that were the case, you never would have purchased your beloved 5800u, nor would you think back on it so fondly (you yourself purchase based on "coolness factor". ;)
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: BigfootKevin
Too many comments to read....but


How is crossfire a failure? It's not even released to the public yet, and we haven't even seen it perform with their new gen of cards.

Perhaps I should have been more specific and said X800 Crossfire.

It's a failure because it has one of the most laughable built in hardware limitations in history built in- the 16X12 60Hz limit.

So, no one would be dumb enough to buy it.

LOL.. since when has intelligence had anything to do with what card anyone purchases? if that were the case, you never would have purchased your beloved 5800u, nor would you think back on it so fondly (you yourself purchase based on "coolness factor". ;)

I've got to admit you have a point there. ;)
(I didn't buy the MAXX, V5, or 5800s for their gaming prowess)
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: Wreckage
I would have said voodoo because 3DFX died just after that, however crossfire has been a HUGE disappointment.

A clarification 3DFX did not die...
It was bought by the NVidia Group.....

Sort of Like Mocrosoft is known for buying out its competition..lol

 

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
But most of us do not create slanted threads with the intention of flaming anyone who disagrees.

Neither does Rollo :roll:

But not everyone starts flamewars, besides I am still waiting for your answer. Was
quote:
LOL

Spank spank spank!

Proposed specs of unavailable products!

Whack whack whack!


parody?

That was not parody. I said the thread was parody. It seems that it is in retaliation for another post. Once again everyone has retaliated, yeah it is wrong; do you want me to tell everyone who does something like that that they were wrong or something?

-Kevin

Retaliation for which post? Actually was a very quiet thread about the possiblity of a fall release for the r580 - was no flaming.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Wreckage
I would have said voodoo because 3DFX died just after that, however crossfire has been a HUGE disappointment.

A clarification 3DFX did not die...
It was bought by the NVidia Group.....

Sort of Like Mocrosoft is known for buying out its competition..lol

3dfx was in very serious fiscal doodoo when Nv did the buyout.

Most of their failure was a result of their business model. While nvidia and ati outsourced their designs to fabs, and outsourced the card designs to OEMs, 3dfx insisted that they manufacture damn near every component.
 

imported_goku

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2004
7,613
3
0
Originally posted by: DRavisher
Originally posted by: ronnn
Yes, the cross fire mb is looking very good - for a run at the speed crown. Guess if it wins the big 3dmark derby - will be hard to call it a failure. But no doubt many people will say the speed crown is unimportant (myself being one actually).

edit: Does anyone really care if the x800 line is xfire compatable? Why put in two cards when one will do?

I guess that's the big issue. x8xx crossfire is only 'necessary' at high resolutions :p

And it certainly seems ATi have some pretty nice MBs comming. Will be nice to have more than one (nvidia) chipset designers to choose from for us enthusiasts.

Having cross fire for the X8XX series cards won't be too bad, all it will let people do is support newer games at decent resolutions with decent settings longer... This incarnation of crossfire will encourage the whole "just add in another card for double performance" thing and will extend the life of the product. You could pickup another X800 for example, fairly cheap by the time the X800 is slow which will then have performance albiet lower but somewhere in the range of a 7800GT/X which will allow one to keep their graphics card longer before scrapping it.
IMO, I like to keep hardware until it fails, and if I've got an itching for something newer, all I do is just make my current hardware fail sooner, like overclock the sh!t outta it! :p
 

imported_goku

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2004
7,613
3
0
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
of course i don't know why rage fury maxx isn't included either (and frankly x-fire doesn't belong on this list -- not yet anyway)
Rollo liked the Rage MAXX . . . :p

that's why
:Q

it was an abomination that couldn't live up to ATI's promise to make it work with Win2K ;)

Teh MAXX was teh roxor.

ATIs Rage Fury chip was WAY behind the GF1 in driver quality and speed. So what does ATI do?
Cobbles two of them together on a board to make the a close second place card where two inferior GPUs render every other frame.
It was a totally cool solution that would have went over a lot better if they could have worked out those nagging details like synching the AFR, flashing textures, and Win2K.

I didn't use Win2K, so I only experienced two of its weaknesses. I can tell you this- I'd take flashing textures at times and jumpy fps over looking at 60Hz flashing in front of me like some 70s disco.

Your seriously retarded... 60HZ isn't THAT BAD.
 

imported_Rampage

Senior member
Jun 6, 2005
935
0
0
Originally posted by: goku
Your seriously retarded... 60HZ isn't THAT BAD.

I'm not sure if "your" retarded, or if you're retarded? :D
I'm amused at the amount of ignorance displayed when people attempt to bash one another.
Before you attempt to degrade someone, you might want to hit the books and raise that IQ above 50. :thumbsup:

But if thats your POV, then I'll expect you to be the first one in line to purchase a Crossfire rig.
1920x1200@52hz isnt that bad either. ;)
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Wreckage
I would have said voodoo because 3DFX died just after that, however crossfire has been a HUGE disappointment.

A clarification 3DFX did not die...
It was bought by the NVidia Group.....

Sort of Like Mocrosoft is known for buying out its competition..lol

3dfx was in very serious fiscal doodoo when Nv did the buyout.

And you would know?
rofl....I find it incredible that you would give any credance to 3DFX dying....
I was absolutely 100% correct...they did not die!!

Thank You for corroberating what I stated earlier!!

Most of their failure was a result of their business model. While nvidia and ati outsourced their designs to fabs, and outsourced the card designs to OEMs, 3dfx insisted that they manufacture damn near every component.

 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Wreckage
I would have said voodoo because 3DFX died just after that, however crossfire has been a HUGE disappointment.

A clarification 3DFX did not die...
It was bought by the NVidia Group.....

Sort of Like Mocrosoft is known for buying out its competition..lol

i don't understand why some ppl keep saying this...

3dfx was dead. plans were considered on how best to dissolve the company, and it was decided the nvidia deal would provide the best return to crediters, shareholders, etc.

3dfx not manufacturing products by that time; all that was left were the "certain graphics related assets of 3dfx Interactive" (intellectual property), which nvidia purchased after the fact (for a bout 70m in cash and some stock).... the company itself had already "died" for all intensive purposes.
 

imported_Rampage

Senior member
Jun 6, 2005
935
0
0
Nvidia 5800 Ultra leads to -> 7800GTX :D
Voodoo5 research and other 3dfx intellectual properties leads to -> 7800GTX

ATI MAXX leads to -> Crossfire ?!?! ;)
Impressive!
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Wreckage
I would have said voodoo because 3DFX died just after that, however crossfire has been a HUGE disappointment.

A clarification 3DFX did not die...
It was bought by the NVidia Group.....

Sort of Like Mocrosoft is known for buying out its competition..lol

3dfx was in very serious fiscal doodoo when Nv did the buyout.

And you would know?
rofl....I find it incredible that you would give any credance to 3DFX dying....
I was absolutely 100% correct...they did not die!!

Thank You for corroberating what I stated earlier!!

Most of their failure was a result of their business model. While nvidia and ati outsourced their designs to fabs, and outsourced the card designs to OEMs, 3dfx insisted that they manufacture damn near every component.

wow you suck at quoting.

Also i disagreed with you, 3dfx was dead before nvidia bought the IP.
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: goku
Your seriously retarded... 60HZ isn't THAT BAD.

Really?


The conclusion of Firing Squads article
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati...s_200_crossfire_performance/page11.asp
That?s right, the rumors you?ve been hearing about CrossFire being limited to 1600x1200 max resolution at a headache-inducing 60Hz are unfortunately true. How ATI?s engineers could have overlooked this limitation when developing CrossFire ? a product which doesn?t really shine until you crank up the screen resolutions ? is pretty baffling.

The conclusion of Hs review
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=ODE1LDE2
However, it was useless; we were stuck at 60Hz in every 3D game with CrossFire enabled.
We are very disappointed in this limitation. With a CRT, 60Hz looks and feels bad.We see this limitation as a very serious problem with CrossFire.


I guess there are other "retards" that think looking at 60Hz is painful as well? I think you should try it a while and see if you have any CRTs around. AFAIK the VESA standard for no eyestrain looking at a CRT is 72Hz?
 

TinyTeeth

Member
Dec 14, 2004
27
0
0
But when will you understand, the R5xx generation won't have the resolution limitation! So it will probably not be a failure.

Sure, the X850XT Crossfire Editions have the limitation, but the newer cards will not have them. Imagine this - Nvidia implemented SLI for 5800 Ultra too, but with a resolution limitation. Would you call SLI a failure because of this?

Plus, as some have pointed out already.

a) Crossfire is NOT a video card.
b) It's merely even released yet - you can't call it a failure when it's new.
and
c) As I and many others have already pointed out: The next generation WILL NOT have the resolution limitation.

It is painfully obvious you are intentionally neglecting facts because they don't suit your anti-ATI agenda.
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,170
13
81
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
a fair amount of the time he has a very valid and interesting point to make.

-Kevin


So please explain the valid "point" of creating this thread other than being just one more in an endless string of anti-ATI posts.


Originally posted by: Rollo
What was the most spectacular failure in video card history?


Let's examine the choices we were given.

S3 Savage 2000 - Released May, 1999 - long out of production
3DFX Voodoo 5 - Released July, 2000 - long out of production
nVidia 5800 Ultra - Released January, 2003 - long out of production
ATI Crossfire - Released September, 2005 - Newly released and just beginning production


Originally posted by: Rollo
I thought it would be fun to take a trip down memory lane, vote for the most spectacular.

Memory lane? Crossfire was released only days ago. How is that "memory lane" to anybody without short term memory loss? How can Crossfire accurately be considered a "spectacular failure" when it will obviously go through multiple more revisions/improvements over the next couple of years? No, he thought "it would be fun" to create yet another anti-ATI slanted thread. And everybody knows it.

Isn't it getting old to you yet, Kevin? Because it sure is for the rest of us. I have no problem with anybody who is Pro-nVidia or Pro-ATI. It's the unending Anti-ATI threads/posts from Rollo that are causing so many people to label him a fanboy. I would have no issues with Rollo if it weren't for his constant posting of anti-ATI half-truths and "sly" comments.

Honestly, he takes all the fun out of being a hardware enthusiast who visits the Video Forums.
 

rbV5

Lifer
Dec 10, 2000
12,632
0
0
Sigh.

Still can't get over the Pure Video thing can you RBV5?

Well, as the 6800GT was probably the biggest selling card of the last year, I couldn't put that as a "spectacular failure".

Believe it or not, it looks like most people could give a fat rats ass about WMV9 acceleration on a gaming card. In spite of your efforts, nV OEMS sold freaking craploads of 6800GTs.

You'll note that I didn't list Nvidia's "purevideo" debacle as a "spectacular failure" either. I was only speaking to your post about hardware limitations, which Nvidia has their share of on their own. At least ATI is totally upfront about their hardware limitations in Crossfire (I hope LOL), yet Nvidia still promotes "purevideo" as if nothing is wrong. You'll also note that I praised my 6800 card that I purchased as being a good value for a gaming card the whole while, and sold it after several months of use to another member of this forum who was happy about the purchase. You'll also note that I have also praised some aspects of "Purevideo" like MPEG decoding the whole while as well...to this day even...you see I understand the actual issue, unlike yourself.

My "efforts" as you call them were only to inform other users of issues with the card, and to hopefully get Nvidia to work on getting them resolved. The former was accomplished, not by me, but by other enthusiasts that continued to raise the issue above the noise that other users such as yourself, who despite admittedly "caring less" about the issue, would post in thread after thread in an attempt to dismiss both other users even considering it as being a problem at all, ridiculing them for using a "gamer card" for anything other than gaming and expecting it to work, and trying to act like you even had a clue what you were talking about the whole time. The latter is "who knows" as many of the "purevideo" features have yet to be delivered on even the supposed "working" cards.

Something tells me that alot more users play video on their "gaming" cards than will ever "play" anything on a multi-gpu platform.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
You nVidiots are gonna like this. :p

Crossfire not so available after all
The one real source for the cards, ATI, itself, doesn't even have them, but it wants us to believe that they are available.
. . .

I figured that I would ask an ATI partner, personally. One of them, listed on the partners page sent me the following, names scrubbed of course.

"[Company Name] has never seen a Crossfire part, not even a working sample. We don't know if it's any good, all we can do is hope that ATI contacts us eventually and shows us some samples. I was surprised they launched it - but how can you launch something when the very market you're trying to target hasn't seen or touched a board? Until then it's unlikely (make that impossible) that we'll add it to our systems."

:Q

so there is No x800 Crossfire . . . it's a PAPER LAUNCH
 

imported_Rampage

Senior member
Jun 6, 2005
935
0
0
Originally posted by: Creig
Honestly, he takes all the fun out of being a hardware enthusiast who visits the Video Forums.

From an outside perspective, I must attest that its you, turtle, a few other people whose names I dont remember... and formerly ronnn (but he seems much more level headed now) that make it an unpleasant place.

Rollo is entertaining, informative and quite friendly actually if you talk to him about ATI hes quite knowledgable.

Hes actually probably owned more ATI products than anyone here. He knows the pitfalls and pluses to both hardware lineups.

Of course, thats just my experience.. maybe some of you are so adversarial that he doesnt feel like exactly being kind to you.. you are probably bringing on more "Anti ATI" threads from your own reaction to him than anything else.

I dont find this thread as "Anti ATI", there seems to be four options to pick from.

Any finding of 'anti ati bias' is in your minds alone.