Whilst the theory of the above is true, I think you have gone off in a slightly different direction than the actual question.the only close-to-reliable external or internal drive is the one... you have backed up. Or at least mirrored (Raid1).
You can NEVER rely on "statistical reliability" of any mechanical storage. They just break. Without warning. Your data will be gone even if your drive will be the first to go down in this world - so even if anything had 100.00000% reliability before, your data will be lost.
And I'm pretty sure you understand there is nothing with 100.0000% today.
Back up, mate. Storage costs nothing today. Buy identical drives, two of them, have your data stored twice. Don't put all eggs to the same basket. NEVER.
I don't agree with this at all. The whole purpose of a portable hard drive is that they are small and portable. If you stick your own HDD into a fanned enclosure it will be much larger, heavier and require separate power. There is also just as much chance of electronics or mechanical failure whichever route you take. As I have already pointed out above, portable HDDs are not the primary location of data storage. Unless you are a fool, if your drive fails it is most likely to cause you inconvenience rather than data loss.No pre-built portable hdd is safe. They are strapped together with inferior parts. If you want something that is worthy of your data, pick a hdd and stick it in the eSata fanned enclosure of your choosing.
Last edited by Coup27; Today at 02:37 PM. Reason: grammar
No it doesn't. What you have done there is made yourself look incredibly pathetic by not responding to my post with anything to support your statement, but rather tried to dismiss my post because I put a comma in the wrong place.Nothing else need to be said.
Charlie, how much did you pay?