Because they are stronger under compression also and if you have ever seen an engine that blew due to a connecting rod that failed you would understand the reason for spending the money for the extra insurance on a high performance engine.Originally posted by: Howard
If that's so, I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
Originally posted by: Howard
If that's so, I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Rotary pwnz j00.
I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
No, what I meant was, why not high-compressive and not high-tensile. But I guess you people have somewhat remedied my ignorance.Originally posted by: cavemanmoron
more of the stress is actually on the wrist pin,and the big and little ends,{where the bearings go}
I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
what would you suggest? cast iron rods?
Originally posted by: HokieESM
Originally posted by: Howard
If that's so, I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
The "tensile" stress refers to the "yield stress" (usually the 0.2% offset stress) found during a tensile test. Most theories of plasticity assume that materials yield at a certain effective deviatoric stress--and since that's computed in terms of squares, its positive regardless of tension or compression. (I would hope I would know this..... or my advisor would kill me)
More practically, steel yields at the same stress in tension and compression. You can try this in a "tensile tester" (most will do compression)... you just have to do it carefully. Tension tests are easy--the metal fails, the jaws pull apart. But compression tests can lead to problems--when the material yields, the jaws can move rapidly, crashing them together (and Instrons aren't cheap). But you can show that the yield stress in tension and compression are quite close.
Oh, and a random fact--there IS significant tension experienced by a connecting rod (usually when the piston is drawing air/fuel mixture into the cylinder). Note also that just because the center of the connecting rod is in compression, it does not mean that the areas around the pins are in compression. Most connecting rod failures (that I've seen anyway) aren't due to yield, but due to fracture. And fracture is usually driven by high tensile stresses.
Definately.Originally posted by: IGBT
I'd think you'd have to do the math but seems like the combustion srtoke would be stressful as well..
Originally posted by: HokieESM
Originally posted by: Howard
If that's so, I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
The "tensile" stress refers to the "yield stress" (usually the 0.2% offset stress) found during a tensile test. Most theories of plasticity assume that materials yield at a certain effective deviatoric stress--and since that's computed in terms of squares, its positive regardless of tension or compression. (I would hope I would know this..... or my advisor would kill me)
More practically, steel yields at the same stress in tension and compression. You can try this in a "tensile tester" (most will do compression)... you just have to do it carefully. Tension tests are easy--the metal fails, the jaws pull apart. But compression tests can lead to problems--when the material yields, the jaws can move rapidly, crashing them together (and Instrons aren't cheap). But you can show that the yield stress in tension and compression are quite close.
Oh, and a random fact--there IS significant tension experienced by a connecting rod (usually when the piston is drawing air/fuel mixture into the cylinder). Note also that just because the center of the connecting rod is in compression, it does not mean that the areas around the pins are in compression. Most connecting rod failures (that I've seen anyway) aren't due to yield, but due to fracture. And fracture is usually driven by high tensile stresses.
Originally posted by: JC
Originally posted by: HokieESM
Originally posted by: Howard
If that's so, I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
The "tensile" stress refers to the "yield stress" (usually the 0.2% offset stress) found during a tensile test. Most theories of plasticity assume that materials yield at a certain effective deviatoric stress--and since that's computed in terms of squares, its positive regardless of tension or compression. (I would hope I would know this..... or my advisor would kill me)
More practically, steel yields at the same stress in tension and compression. You can try this in a "tensile tester" (most will do compression)... you just have to do it carefully. Tension tests are easy--the metal fails, the jaws pull apart. But compression tests can lead to problems--when the material yields, the jaws can move rapidly, crashing them together (and Instrons aren't cheap). But you can show that the yield stress in tension and compression are quite close.
Oh, and a random fact--there IS significant tension experienced by a connecting rod (usually when the piston is drawing air/fuel mixture into the cylinder). Note also that just because the center of the connecting rod is in compression, it does not mean that the areas around the pins are in compression. Most connecting rod failures (that I've seen anyway) aren't due to yield, but due to fracture. And fracture is usually driven by high tensile stresses.
I'm thinking most of the tension forces are when the rods are trying to keep the pistons from flying out of the block at TDC at high RPM.
In any case, the rods surely endure a harsh environment, even in a mild engine.JC
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: JC
Originally posted by: HokieESM
Originally posted by: Howard
If that's so, I wonder why people tout high-tensile steel for conrods...
The "tensile" stress refers to the "yield stress" (usually the 0.2% offset stress) found during a tensile test. Most theories of plasticity assume that materials yield at a certain effective deviatoric stress--and since that's computed in terms of squares, its positive regardless of tension or compression. (I would hope I would know this..... or my advisor would kill me)
More practically, steel yields at the same stress in tension and compression. You can try this in a "tensile tester" (most will do compression)... you just have to do it carefully. Tension tests are easy--the metal fails, the jaws pull apart. But compression tests can lead to problems--when the material yields, the jaws can move rapidly, crashing them together (and Instrons aren't cheap). But you can show that the yield stress in tension and compression are quite close.
Oh, and a random fact--there IS significant tension experienced by a connecting rod (usually when the piston is drawing air/fuel mixture into the cylinder). Note also that just because the center of the connecting rod is in compression, it does not mean that the areas around the pins are in compression. Most connecting rod failures (that I've seen anyway) aren't due to yield, but due to fracture. And fracture is usually driven by high tensile stresses.
I'm thinking most of the tension forces are when the rods are trying to keep the pistons from flying out of the block at TDC at high RPM.
In any case, the rods surely endure a harsh environment, even in a mild engine.JC
The rod bolts would be your weak link in that situation. Plenty of super strong aftermarket bolts are available to prevent this. I personally like the ARP Wave Loc. They are what's in my engine.