most hardware taxing game?

Spikesoldier

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2001
6,766
0
0
in your opinion, whats the game that just needs powerful hardware? for arguements sake lets say were doing 1280x1024 with no FSAA or AF.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
All these games mentioned are very taxing. but Painkiller should be added to the list, especially with the BOoH expansion.

My testing with all these games (except HL2, which I have, but yet regretably not yet installed) shows that D3 is the best coded and, therefore, did not tax my system as much as FC and PK+BOoH.

For example, game load (and reload after dying) times improved considerable for FC and PK when moving from 512MB of ram to 1 gig. D3 showed little or no improvement. With 512MB D3 is still faster reloading that the other two with a gig.


Fern
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
Originally posted by: bNeta86
EQ2

Oddly.

I tried EQ2 at highest settings, no issues. Doom3 is a beast on any system, and is the only game that helps the arguement of SLI. Of course, the game sucks, so it's not worth it still.
 

bNeta86

Member
May 7, 2002
176
0
0
malak - in a city? or with 10+ other people around?

It takes a serious machine to run it at max settings...mine sure cant handle it ;-)






You're right on D3 - hehe I would have tried it at max settings but the game was so weak I didnt even bother.
 

Smilin

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2002
7,357
0
0
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
Doom 3

Without a doubt...

Graphics wise Doom 3 will cripple a weak graphics card.

Memory wise, Sim City 4 will cripple even a machine with a Gig of ram

CPU wise - it's a tossup. There are quite a few games that cpu bottleneck after graphics.

 

BigPoppa

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,930
0
0
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: bNeta86
EQ2

Oddly.

I tried EQ2 at highest settings, no issues. Doom3 is a beast on any system, and is the only game that helps the arguement of SLI. Of course, the game sucks, so it's not worth it still.

You ran EQ2 at extreme quality no problem? /bow down. Care to pose some screenies? Highest I've run was HQ on a 6600GT. Playable during xp, but not in the cities.
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
Originally posted by: bNeta86
malak - in a city? or with 10+ other people around?

It takes a serious machine to run it at max settings...mine sure cant handle it ;-)

No I never made it to a real city, seemed to be just a village I was in. It was for the free trial. I never once had even so much as a hiccup though. There are dozens of NPCs around and a dozen or so PC's. I've heard EQ2 could take advantage of 2GB of RAM, which I only have half of. Without any experience in a city I can't really vouch for that.
 

Pr0d1gy

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2005
7,774
0
76
Planetside is a beast on your FPS. I have a killer new system and my frames still drop into the 5-10fps range in big firefights.
 

cbehnken

Golden Member
Aug 23, 2004
1,402
0
0
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: bNeta86
malak - in a city? or with 10+ other people around?

It takes a serious machine to run it at max settings...mine sure cant handle it ;-)

No I never made it to a real city, seemed to be just a village I was in. It was for the free trial. I never once had even so much as a hiccup though. There are dozens of NPCs around and a dozen or so PC's. I've heard EQ2 could take advantage of 2GB of RAM, which I only have half of. Without any experience in a city I can't really vouch for that.


Yes EQ2 is the most demanding game so far.

It will use much more than 1 GB of ram on max settings. I run High Quality at 1600x1200 on my x800XL and it plays very well. If I turn it on Very High Quality in the cities it uses 1300 MB of ram and I begin swapping and thus terrible performance. Runs fine in open country on max settings though.

 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
Originally posted by: Pr0d1gy
Planetside is a beast on your FPS. I have a killer new system and my frames still drop into the 5-10fps range in big firefights.

You have a configuration problem then. I played Planetside on an old computer and never had that problem.
 

flawlssdistortn

Senior member
Sep 21, 2004
680
0
0
Originally posted by: cbehnken
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: bNeta86
malak - in a city? or with 10+ other people around?

It takes a serious machine to run it at max settings...mine sure cant handle it ;-)

No I never made it to a real city, seemed to be just a village I was in. It was for the free trial. I never once had even so much as a hiccup though. There are dozens of NPCs around and a dozen or so PC's. I've heard EQ2 could take advantage of 2GB of RAM, which I only have half of. Without any experience in a city I can't really vouch for that.


Yes EQ2 is the most demanding game so far.

It will use much more than 1 GB of ram on max settings. I run High Quality at 1600x1200 on my x800XL and it plays very well. If I turn it on Very High Quality in the cities it uses 1300 MB of ram and I begin swapping and thus terrible performance. Runs fine in open country on max settings though.


Maybe it's just sloppy programming?
 

j511180

Senior member
Mar 22, 2005
335
0
0
Of the games that I'm playing now, I'd say GTR FIA GT (racing sim), especially in a race with 20+ cars.
 

blazer78

Senior member
Feb 26, 2003
436
0
0
Simcity 4

once u have a huge population in your city, you'll be needing a supercomputer.
 

cbehnken

Golden Member
Aug 23, 2004
1,402
0
0
Originally posted by: flawlssdistortn
Originally posted by: cbehnken
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: bNeta86
malak - in a city? or with 10+ other people around?

It takes a serious machine to run it at max settings...mine sure cant handle it ;-)

No I never made it to a real city, seemed to be just a village I was in. It was for the free trial. I never once had even so much as a hiccup though. There are dozens of NPCs around and a dozen or so PC's. I've heard EQ2 could take advantage of 2GB of RAM, which I only have half of. Without any experience in a city I can't really vouch for that.


Yes EQ2 is the most demanding game so far.

It will use much more than 1 GB of ram on max settings. I run High Quality at 1600x1200 on my x800XL and it plays very well. If I turn it on Very High Quality in the cities it uses 1300 MB of ram and I begin swapping and thus terrible performance. Runs fine in open country on max settings though.


Maybe it's just sloppy programming?

Mostly just huge textures. Have you ever played it? The environment is huge, especially in the cities.