Originally posted by: Sluggo
It goes like this:
52 weeks in a year, so you make 26 payments. In effect you made 13 monthly payments in one year.
You can get a regular loan, make one extra principal payment every year and get the exact sameresults.
The end result being your loan pays off quicker since you are reducing the principal, therefore reducing the amount of interest that is calculated upon the outstanding pricipal amount.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Sluggo
It goes like this:
52 weeks in a year, so you make 26 payments. In effect you made 13 monthly payments in one year.
You can get a regular loan, make one extra principal payment every year and get the exact sameresults.
The end result being your loan pays off quicker since you are reducing the principal, therefore reducing the amount of interest that is calculated upon the outstanding pricipal amount.
which might not be a good idea.
talk to your accountant and work the numbers.
Originally posted by: Sluggo
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Sluggo
It goes like this:
52 weeks in a year, so you make 26 payments. In effect you made 13 monthly payments in one year.
You can get a regular loan, make one extra principal payment every year and get the exact sameresults.
The end result being your loan pays off quicker since you are reducing the principal, therefore reducing the amount of interest that is calculated upon the outstanding pricipal amount.
which might not be a good idea.
talk to your accountant and work the numbers.
How can it not be a good idea? The only advantage could be the mortgage interest deduction on your taxes and that only applies if you itemize, which most people dont.
Say you pay 10k a year in interest on your mortgage and are in a 30% tax bracket. Why would you send the bank 10k to keep from paying the IRS 3k?