-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
More ram?
- Thread starter Viper0329
- Start date
bigbootydaddy
Banned
yeah, win2k will love you as it loves me and my 512mb
sharkeeper
Lifer
Capture doesn't have near the requirements as editing does. Any hard disk that's two years old or newer can capture video from any consumer based product. When you edit the video is where you want the fastest write speed and (free) physical memory for disk caching!
Get all your board can support (768 or 1500).
<< I just realized that Win9x cant really address anything more than 128MB, and will give you errors for anything more than 512MB. (its a 'dumb' OS) >>
That's completely false. The VCACHE.VXD has problems when its allowed to allocate more than 511 MB of physical memory. Otherwise, Windows 9x can address huge amounts of ram. (4 GBytes to be exact)
I recommend NT anyways so the point is moot. 🙂
Cheers!
Get all your board can support (768 or 1500).
<< I just realized that Win9x cant really address anything more than 128MB, and will give you errors for anything more than 512MB. (its a 'dumb' OS) >>
That's completely false. The VCACHE.VXD has problems when its allowed to allocate more than 511 MB of physical memory. Otherwise, Windows 9x can address huge amounts of ram. (4 GBytes to be exact)
I recommend NT anyways so the point is moot. 🙂
Cheers!
JWMiddleton
Diamond Member
<< I just realized that Win9x cant really address anything more than 128MB...>>
I have seen this written before, but I've upgraded three of my Win98SE systems from 128 MB to 256 MB and I've noticed improvement on each of them. Thus, I have doubts about the valid of the statement.
I have seen this written before, but I've upgraded three of my Win98SE systems from 128 MB to 256 MB and I've noticed improvement on each of them. Thus, I have doubts about the valid of the statement.
I shoulda written more, but i had to leave. Gonna dual boot Win98se and 2k on P3 1ghz, and asus cusl2. The 815e only addresses 512mb of ram. I just plan on transfering my homevideos to VCDs, don't know much about editing. I was just wondering if another 256 would help my capture faster. Also, HD is IBM 75gxp 45gb. Thx
chuckieland
Diamond Member
new and faster HD would problem benfit more
but what the heck memory is so cheap now, may as well pick them up before the price jackup
but what the heck memory is so cheap now, may as well pick them up before the price jackup