mikeymikec
Lifer
- May 19, 2011
- 20,977
- 16,220
- 136
Pretty good reason to keep them out then. Sure, their anger is justified. They still mean harm, regardless.
Maybe you should apply for a United Airlines PR role?
Pretty good reason to keep them out then. Sure, their anger is justified. They still mean harm, regardless.
Not all of them, in fact it's a small percentage.Pretty good reason to keep them out then. Sure, their anger is justified. They still mean harm, regardless.
Easy there, I didn't say it's solely on us....of course, they did plenty before and after... compare the size and scale here: (Skip to 1:15 if you wanna' get right to the action.)
Sorry... the theory that it's OUR fault for "triggering" a response is false.
yeah, Muslims are automatically suspect. If you actually look at the profile, the Muslims doing these terrorist attacks do so for ideological reasons tied in with their Muslim identity. They aren't doing so because poverty results in a breakdown of mental capacity which is the convenient fiction liberals so desperately want to believe. Many are capable and successful professionals who have prosperous careers and years of generous education. Especially in the case of Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, I believe they were gradually radicalized while in the USA and did not come in intending to do harm. But gradually, their Muslim identity took precedence.
You do realize you're devolving into a cartoonish fantasy, right? As if the only reason Muslims aren't killing every non-Muslim in sight is because they're suppressing key parts of their faith, and the moment they let it take over they have to go on a murderous rampage?
Also, it's fairly well established that some ISIS members have signed up because it's a chance to escape a financial dead end, not because they were particularly inspired. I haven't seen any liberal claim that poverty triggers a "breakdown of mental capacity," just that it pushes people to do things they otherwise wouldn't. Do you have evidence to the contrary? (Something tells me that the answer is "no.")
I'm accepting of any religion that's not out to force their beliefs on others thru bully tactics, hate, or violence.
It's good to know you stand with us against islam.
Have you been bullied into converting Islam? Call BLUE_MAX NOW ON HELP-MEEEEEE-555
It's good to know you stand with us against islam.
Not yet; moslems are still the minority in the US. I also have not been bullied into converting back to Christianity, nor was I killed for rejecting it.
Liberals have probably already been secretly infected though eh
You can't tell for sure because taqiyya
Well, they do hate inbred Christians but love them some inbred moslems. It's okay though, as obesity, feminism, homosexuality, and career-before-family means they reproduce less. It's not genocide by moslem, it's suicide by liberalism. Future generations will be more conservative.
If you came from an inbred Christian family you can't convert away from your inbredism
That shit is in your genes eh
So, no response?
If you plan on having children one day, you need to make sure that you are not related to your partner
Why do you hate islam? You need to be more culturally sensitive or your liberal friends will ostracize you.
Now Antifa wants to bring guns to protests:
![]()
Not yet; moslems are still the minority in the US. I also have not been bullied into converting back to Christianity, nor was I killed for rejecting it.
Well, they do hate inbred Christians but love them some inbred moslems. It's okay though, as obesity, feminism, homosexuality, and career-before-family means they reproduce less. It's not genocide by moslem, it's suicide by liberalism. Future generations will be more conservative.
Hey, here's an idea! Let's take those 100 million literal believers and arm them, then drop them into the Middle East. Both problems will solve themselves.
Why do you hate people defending themselves from fascists and white supremacists?
That's the plot to Idiocracy, isn't it?
I don't see the point,