More of Rumsfeld's Follies?

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Transcript: Jane Wallace Interviews Seymour Hersh

http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_hersh.html


JANE WALLACE: Let's talk about Konduz. During the war with Afghanistan--

SY HERSH: Great story.

JANE WALLACE: -- you reported that during a key battle our side in that battle had the enemy surrounded. There were a reported perhaps 8,000 enemy forces in there.

SY HERSH: Maybe even more. But certainly minimum that many.

JANE WALLACE: It's your story, take it.

SY HERSH: Okay, the cream of the crop of Al Qaeda caught in a town called Konduz which is near ... it's one little village and it's a couple hundred kilometers, 150 miles from the border of Pakistan. And I learned this story frankly-- through very, very clandestine operatives we have in the Delta Force and other very...

We were operating very heavily with a small number of men, three, 400 really in the first days of the war. And suddenly one night when they had everybody cornered in Konduz-- the special forces people were told there was a corridor that they could not fly in. There was a corridor sealed off to-- the United States military sealed off a corridor. And it was nobody could shoot anybody in this little lane that went from Konduz into Pakistan. And that's how I learned about it. I learned about it from a military guy who wanted to fly helicopters and kill people and couldn't do it that day.

JANE WALLACE: So, we had the enemy surrounded, the special forces guys are helping surround this enemy.

SY HERSH: They're whacking everybody they can whack that looks like a bad guy.

JANE WALLACE: And suddenly they're told to back off--

SY HERSH: From a certain area--

JANE WALLACE: -- and let planes fly out to Pakistan.

SY HERSH: There was about a three or four nights in which I can tell you maybe six, eight, 10, maybe 12 more-- or more heavily weighted-- Pakistani military planes flew out with an estimated-- no less than 2,500 maybe 3,000, maybe mmore. I've heard as many as four or 5,000. They were not only-- Al Qaeda but they were also-- you see the Pakistani ISI was-- the military advised us to the Taliban and Al Qaeda. There were dozens of senior Pakistani military officers including two generals who flew out.

And I also learned after I wrote this story that maybe even some of Bin Laden's immediate family were flown out on the those evacuations. We allowed them to evacuate. We had an evacuation.

JANE WALLACE: How high up was that evacuation authorized?

SY HERSH: I am here to tell you it was authorized ? Donald Rumsfeld who ? we'll talk about what he said later ? it had to be authorized at the White House. But certainly at the Secretary of Defense level.

JANE WALLACE: The Department of Defense said to us that they were not involved and that they don't have any knowledge of that operation.

SY HERSH: That's what Rumsfeld said when they asked him but it. And he said, "Gee, really?" He said, "News to me." Which is not a denial, it's sort of interesting. You know,


JANE WALLACE: What did we do that? Why we would put our special forces guys on the ground, surround the enemy, and then-- fly him out?

SY HERSH: With al Qaeda.

JANE WALLACE: With al Qaeda. Why would we do that, assuming your story is true?

SY HERSH: We did it because the ISI asked us to do so.

JANE WALLACE: Pakistani intelligence.

SY HERSH: Absolutely.


JANE WALLACE: Yeah.

SY HERSH: Yeah. That's why. You asked why. Because we believe Musharraf was under pressure to protect the military men of ? the intelligence people from the military, ISI, that were in the field. The Pakistanis were training the Taliban, and were training al Qaeda.

When the war began, even though this is-- again, you know, this is complicated. Musharraf asked, as a favor, to protect his position. If we suddenly seized, in in the field, a few dozen military soldiers, including generals, and put them in jail, and punished them, he would be under tremendous pressure from the fundamentalists at home.

So, to protect him, we perceive that it's important to protect him, he asked us-- this is why when I tell you it comes at the level of Don Rumsfeld, it has to. I mean, it does. He asked-- he said, "You've got to protect me. You've got to get my people out."

The initial plan was to take out the Pakistani military. What happened is that they took out al Qaeda with them. And we had no way of stopping it. We lost control. Once there planes began to go, the Pakistanis began-- thousands of al Qaeda got out. And so-- we weren't able to stop it and screen it. The intent wasn't to let al Qaeda out. It was to protect the Pakistani military.

SY HERSH: What else can you do? We need the idea of some sort of country as a bulwark to what's going-- look, Afghanistan is smoking today. You know if you want another reality, the reality that nobody wants to hear about is that probably from Khandhar to Jalalabad and all of the southern part of Afghanistan is cowboy and Indian territory.

It's ISI. It's Taliban. It's Pashtun. Some al Qaeda. You know you don't find our troops-- a little bit in-- on the coast near-- you know in the north-- the northern territories. We're-- it's-- we have un-- we're-- we're really at square one even in Afghanistan.

JANE WALLACE: Okay, I'm gonna slow you down because you know your material very well. The northwestern part of Pakistan--

SY HERSH: Right.

JANE WALLACE: --that borders on Afghanistan now is where the-- the al Qaeda forces are said to be regrouped?

SY HERSH: Along with Kashmir. They probably are there too.

JANE WALLACE: Yes. This is where some of our American troops-- we have about 8,000 left in Afghanistan, are facing some of the heaviest fighting they've seen in a year.

SY HERSH: The forces that are seeing heavy fighting are a few special forces that are there and some elite units from the 82nd Airborne. Most of our troops are just guarding bases. But we have some elite units in contact. Yes.

JANE WALLACE: What you're saying is that then part of the forces our guys are facing are forces that are being supported by or intermixed with Pakistan intelligence which is a government we support. And al Qaeda, which is supported by a government we support. In other words we're doing battle with ourselves to some degree?

SY HERSH: I'll make it better. We have reason to think, from intelligence-- I haven't written this that-- that the Saudi's are financing some of this all the way.

JANE WALLACE: Financing what?

SY HERSH: Saudi's put a lot of money into Pakistan to religious aspects. I'm not saying the Saudi's necessarily-- the Saudi government knows that the money they're putting in is ending up supplying the forces that are in contact with our forces in the northern territories. But the fact is the Saudi's are still a supplier of a great deal of funds to Pakistan. We've got a country that's teetering on the edge, we don't want Pakistan to go Islamic. We don't want the weapons to get out of control.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
SY HERSH: There was about a three or four nights in which I can tell you maybe six, eight, 10, maybe 12 more-- or more heavily weighted-- Pakistani military planes flew out with an estimated-- no less than 2,500 maybe 3,000, maybe mmore. I've heard as many as four or 5,000. They were not only-- Al Qaeda but they were also-- you see the Pakistani ISI was-- the military advised us to the Taliban and Al Qaeda. There were dozens of senior Pakistani military officers including two generals who flew out.
this just sounds bad which makes me think that he has no idea what he is talking about
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
That's the trouble with transcripts sometimes...they don't capture the flow of the off-the-cuff conversation nor body language.
 

Codec

Member
Jan 19, 2000
88
0
0
When the war began, even though this is-- again, you know, this is complicated. Musharraf asked, as a favor, to protect his position. If we suddenly seized, in in the field, a few dozen military soldiers, including generals, and put them in jail, and punished them, he would be under tremendous pressure from the fundamentalists at home.

So, to protect him, we perceive that it's important to protect him, he asked us-- this is why when I tell you it comes at the level of Don Rumsfeld, it has to. I mean, it does. He asked-- he said, "You've got to protect me. You've got to get my people out."


Complicated is right. Pakistan harbored and trained a good number of terrorists, but a decision was made to befriend Musharraf, in part in the spirit of divide and conquer. When you choose to play that game, this sort of stuff begins to flow naturally.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
The initial plan was to take out the Pakistani military. What happened is that they took out al Qaeda with them. And we had no way of stopping it. We lost control. Once there planes began to go, the Pakistanis began-- thousands of al Qaeda got out. And so-- we weren't able to stop it and screen it. The intent wasn't to let al Qaeda out. It was to protect the Pakistani military.

If we'd had more of our military in Afghanistan, instead of a token few hundred, we could have had control over that situation.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
If it weren't for Pat Tillman (bless his soul) we wouldn't EVEN KNOW ABOUT Afghanistan anymore :(
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
From an archived Nov. 24, 2001 NY Times article (couldn't get the whole thing as it costs $$)

A NATION CHALLENGED: THE SIEGE; PAKISTANIS AGAIN SAID TO EVACUATE ALLIES OF TALIBAN

By DEXTER FILKINS and CARLOTTA GALL (NYT) 1614 words
Late Edition - Final , Section A , Page 1 , Column 6
ABSTRACT - Northern Alliance soldiers in Afghanistan report Pakistani airplanes have again flown into encircled city of Kunduz to evacuate Pakistanis who had been fighting with Taliban; photo; map; sightings are not confirmed and US officials are evasive on subject; US is indebted to Pakistan for helping with war but also wants foreign fighters captured or killed; surrender of Kunduz is yet unclear; Taliban forces regroup elsewhere, forming strong pockets of resistance in east, including Jalalabad vicinity (M)
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
We were allowing Pakistan to remove their people. IF not, the poweres that be felt that the existing Pakistani government might collapse.

Where is the evidence that most of al Qaeda &amp; Talibans were evacuated.
SY HERSH: I am here to tell you it was authorized ? Donald Rumsfeld who ? we'll talk about what he said later ? it had to be authorized at the White House. But certainly at the Secretary of Defense level.

JANE WALLACE: The Department of Defense said to us that they were not involved and that they don't have any knowledge of that operation.

SY HERSH: That's what Rumsfeld said when they asked him but it. And he said, "Gee, really?" He said, "News to me." Which is not a denial, it's sort of interesting. You know,

funny way of answering - sounds like soud bite extraction and paraphrasing.
He never comes back to this issue later though.

JANE WALLACE: With al Qaeda. Why would we do that, assuming your story is true?

Seymour Hersh is just providing speculation that others went with the Pakistanis based on stories being told, possibly out of frustration by the people on the ground that were told to lay off.
Also, it was an air corridor that was open, not a ground corridor.

There should be logs of the number of flights that went on along with the type of A/C.

The transcript shows that he seems to have a hard on for Pakistan.

Seymour Hersh The man who broke the story of Vietnam's My Lai massacre
is still the hardest-working muckraker in the journalism business
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Whoever said "most" of Al Qaeda was transported out?

He only said a few thousand were flown out. That's a mix of Al Qaeda, Taliban, and Pakistani military.

Hersh first reported this back in Jan. 2002 in the New Yorker.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,240
136
God knows, but it could be true if we were worried that the beloved patriot gov may collapse as a result of our operations there, letting the fundy Islamists to take over the gov and get their hands the keys to the nukes. Question would be then, would it be better to let some of the Taliban/Al quesadia get away to save the beloved patriot gov, witht he hopes killing them another day? Would we want suicide bombers in control of the big red button?

Interesting consiracy theory nonetheless.