- May 10, 2001
- 21,207
- 2,506
- 126
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
I really am surprised that CPS has not removed her children yet. No means of support, clear evidence of intentional exploitation... what else does it take to make her an unfit mother?
Originally posted by: NSFW
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
I really am surprised that CPS has not removed her children yet. No means of support, clear evidence of intentional exploitation... what else does it take to make her an unfit mother?
I know that here in MI, there has to be evidence that the mother is doing harm to herself or the children. They mean physical harm. Doing/selling drugs, mistreating the kid etc. don't matter.
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
I really am surprised that CPS has not removed her children yet. No means of support, clear evidence of intentional exploitation... what else does it take to make her an unfit mother?
Originally posted by: Chunkee
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
I really am surprised that CPS has not removed her children yet. No means of support, clear evidence of intentional exploitation... what else does it take to make her an unfit mother?
How about the docs foot the bill for giving her the treatments for multiple births?
Originally posted by: rh71
Something that should be on Discovery Health. I've seen c-sections from there... they pull 'em right out one after another.
But for personal videos - I thought most hospitals didn't allow taping for fear of lawsuits, etc. Since it was going to be an epic birth I suppose they made an exception but the fact that it is being sold for profit - that's indeed ridiculous.
All of this is just 1 side of the story though. I haven't been looking for it, but has she come out and said any of this herself? I want money for this and that?
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Chunkee
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
I really am surprised that CPS has not removed her children yet. No means of support, clear evidence of intentional exploitation... what else does it take to make her an unfit mother?
How about the docs foot the bill for giving her the treatments for multiple births?
WHY IS EVERYONE BLAMING THE FUCKING DOCTOR?!?!?
He provided a legal service to a paying customer. It's not a doctor's job to judge his patient. Should this chick have been a multi-billionaire we'd have no issues...medical treatment should not be based on that.
Doctor did his job and did it well. It's the chick that needs help.
My views on our welfare system is to draw a line in the sand. Any new cases are a final 'state' award. You agree to no more children while on the plan, you can elect to be sterilized for free paid by the state if you want. Should you fail to meet these standards any new children will not be covered. You are free to share the food stamps and WIC stuff with them, but any medical card will be only good for the original child.
Any additional kids (or even the first) can be given to the state for care. We will set them up in schools and get them proper socialization (vs the current absentee parents now).
Should be cheaper in the long run and break this cycle. It will be nothing like the orphanages of the old day where kids were abused.
If the parents are going to use their kids as PAWNS, we have to take them or suffer the casualties.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
WHY IS EVERYONE BLAMING THE FUCKING DOCTOR?!?!?
He provided a legal service to a paying customer. It's not a doctor's job to judge his patient. Should this chick have been a multi-billionaire we'd have no issues...medical treatment should not be based on that.
Originally posted by: rh71
Something that should be on Discovery Health. I've seen c-sections from there... they pull 'em right out one after another.
But for personal videos - I thought most hospitals didn't allow taping for fear of lawsuits, etc. Since it was going to be an epic birth I suppose they made an exception but the fact that it is being sold for profit - that's indeed ridiculous.
All of this is just 1 side of the story though. I haven't been looking for it, but has she come out and said any of this herself? I want money for this and that?
Originally posted by: Modelworks
I can hear the doctor now "Damn, there is another one, I didn't sign up for this !"
I and many others believe that it is wrong to implant 6 fetuses simultaneously into a woman who already has 6 children and who is known for having twins. Clearly, there was no need for this proceedure, she was fertile enough as it was. I personaly have something against a doctor doing a proceedure that can cause serious complications when there is no medical need for it. Don't tell me having 8 babies isn't a "serious complication" regardless of income.Originally posted by: alkemyst
WHY IS EVERYONE BLAMING THE FUCKING DOCTOR?!?!?
Originally posted by: dullard
I and many others believe that it is wrong to implant 6 fetuses simultaneously into a woman who already has 6 children and who is known for having twins. Clearly, there was no need for this proceedure, she was fertile enough as it was. I personaly have something about a doctor doing a proceedure that can cause serious complications when there is no medical need for it. Don't tell me having 8 babies isn't a "serious complication" regardless of income.Originally posted by: alkemyst
WHY IS EVERYONE BLAMING THE FUCKING DOCTOR?!?!?
Originally posted by: Homerboy
well at least with SEVEN FIGURES in sales, she will be able to provide for the kids right? That should cool everyone's jets somewhat.
