More info on group that threatened South Park creators

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Is this information new to you?

  • yes

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Jihad doesn't mean some figurative struggle. It means waging war on unbelievers.

"Jihad (pronounced /dʒɪˈhɑːd/; Arabic: جهاد‎ [dʒiˈhæːd]), an Islamic term, is a religious duty of Muslims. In Arabic, the word jihād is a noun meaning "struggle." Jihad appears frequently in the Qur'an and common usage as the idiomatic expression "striving in the way of Allah"
 

Noobtastic

Banned
Jul 9, 2005
3,721
0
0
I think the gripe here is that you seem to be belittling the crimes that have been committed in the name of Christianity when compared to Islamic crimes. Think any number of witch hunts, or east roman vs west roman empire --- although ill concede that was less about religion than more about pure power play.

I dont have numbers handy for judaism, but it is pretty obvious that you'd have to do some kind of per-capita comparison for the reason you mentioned.

Also, the west did have their enlightenment... but during the dark ages the muslim world was "better" than the west. Example: Algebra. Trade --- a benefit of the wars with the Muslim world was the resurgence of trade with the east... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Age_of_Islam) Yeah the muslims came knocking on the west's back door with invasion forces, but to simply tag arabic imperial ambition as purely religiously motivated is simply silly. I think the reasoning goes that islam brought unity to the arab world that allowed them to organize and actually form a decent military. In short, the muslim world seems to have gone through several different ups-and-downs through the years, with this being an obvious low point in their history.

please, golden age was what, 1,000 years ago?

cannot cling to the golden age as a defense.

christianity killed 150,000,000 in 2,000 years, and almost half was through colonization and exposing diseases to native populations.

christian kings, even the most ruthless, are nothing compared to the islamic conquerers in india or the middle east.

remember the caliphates in india, where muslim kings demanded 100,000 hindu heads a day? no?

over 80,000,000 hindus genocided between 10th-14th century.

im not belitting the violence associated with christianity, but it was not institutionalized.

this is why christians are not burning each other at the stake, unlike in muslim land, where violence is sanctioned by the state even in so called "enlightened" nations like turkey and jordan.

as far as judaism goes, i dont get this per capita bullshit.

it doesnt even rank.

jews didn't go around and conquering entire continents. most of their history revolves around getting expelled from every nation - arab, french, egyptian, roman, ottoman, german, british, spanish, etc..etc...

you could go back to the roman-jew wars, but casualties are unknown.

Ummm...that's a very good indication of how you don't really understand this stuff...
The "liberal muslim movement" are the ones who denounce all the violence...it's the radical "traditionalists" that are the terrorists. They adhere strictly to 13th century Islamic law...

comparing KKK to Islamic conquerers is intellectually retarded.

it's like comparing Nazi Germany to the kid down the street who harasses black people.
 
Last edited by a moderator: