More demand for "crappy jobs" shows new report...

[CADsortaGUY]

Services Growth Hits Record in March

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Growth in the U.S. services sector hit a record high in March, well above expectations, a report showed on Monday.

The Institute for Supply Management's non-manufacturing index surged to 65.8 in March from 60.8 in February. Wall Street economists had forecast a rise to 61.5. A number above 50 indicates growth.

The survey's employment index rose in March to 53.9 from 52.7 in February. Growth in demand for new orders rose to 62.8 in March from 60.3 in February.

The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80 percent of the U.S. economy.

I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

CkG

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Services Growth Hits Record in March

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Growth in the U.S. services sector hit a record high in March, well above expectations, a report showed on Monday.

The Institute for Supply Management's non-manufacturing index surged to 65.8 in March from 60.8 in February. Wall Street economists had forecast a rise to 61.5. A number above 50 indicates growth.

The survey's employment index rose in March to 53.9 from 52.7 in February. Growth in demand for new orders rose to 62.8 in March from 60.3 in February.

The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80 percent of the U.S. economy.

I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

CkG

"The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80percent of the U.S. economy."

We're done as a Manufacturing Powerhouse, so why do you continue to post about any "gains" in the Manufacturing sector???

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Services Growth Hits Record in March

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Growth in the U.S. services sector hit a record high in March, well above expectations, a report showed on Monday.

The Institute for Supply Management's non-manufacturing index surged to 65.8 in March from 60.8 in February. Wall Street economists had forecast a rise to 61.5. A number above 50 indicates growth.

The survey's employment index rose in March to 53.9 from 52.7 in February. Growth in demand for new orders rose to 62.8 in March from 60.3 in February.

The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80 percent of the U.S. economy.

I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

CkG

"The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80percent of the U.S. economy."

We're done as a Manufacturing Powerhouse, so why do you continue to post about any "gains" in the Manufacturing sector???

Because you and others bleat endlessly about losing manufacturing jobs - you know...the only ones that are GOOD according to the way people talk around here.

So are you turning over a new leaf today dave? Ready to see that the Economy isn't "suck"?

CkG

 

[CWRMadcat]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Services Growth Hits Record in March

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Growth in the U.S. services sector hit a record high in March, well above expectations, a report showed on Monday.

The Institute for Supply Management's non-manufacturing index surged to 65.8 in March from 60.8 in February. Wall Street economists had forecast a rise to 61.5. A number above 50 indicates growth.

The survey's employment index rose in March to 53.9 from 52.7 in February. Growth in demand for new orders rose to 62.8 in March from 60.3 in February.

The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80 percent of the U.S. economy.

I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

CkG

"The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80percent of the U.S. economy."

We're done as a Manufacturing Powerhouse, so why do you continue to post about any "gains" in the Manufacturing sector???

He's posting about gains in the service sector...what are you talking about? Shouldn't ANY productivity gains, regardless of sector, be welcomed?

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: CWRMadcat

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Services Growth Hits Record in March

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Growth in the U.S. services sector hit a record high in March, well above expectations, a report showed on Monday.

The Institute for Supply Management's non-manufacturing index surged to 65.8 in March from 60.8 in February. Wall Street economists had forecast a rise to 61.5. A number above 50 indicates growth.

The survey's employment index rose in March to 53.9 from 52.7 in February. Growth in demand for new orders rose to 62.8 in March from 60.3 in February.

The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80 percent of the U.S. economy.

I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

Because you and others bleat endlessly about losing manufacturing jobs - you know...the only ones that are GOOD according to the way people talk around here.

So are you turning over a new leaf today dave? Ready to see that the Economy isn't "suck"?

CkG

CkG

"The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80percent of the U.S. economy."

We're done as a Manufacturing Powerhouse, so why do you continue to post about any "gains" in the Manufacturing sector???

He's posting about gains in the service sector...what are you talking about? Shouldn't ANY productivity gains, regardless of sector, be welcomed?[/quote]

Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Clearly that is not the case with$6 hr cleaning Hotel rooms and waiting tables.
No offense to those doing such necessary services, it's just that they are it as far as the job "growth".

 

[dirtboy]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Why pay someone a high wage when they barely know the English language?

Why should uneducated people make lots of money?

You get mad when you pay top dollar for gas, even thought it supports many high wage jobs. Look at you, your intelligence has left you unemployed. Why do you deserve a high paying job?

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Clearly that is not the case with$6 hr cleaning Hotel rooms and waiting tables.
No offense to those doing such necessary services, it's just that they are it as far as the job "growth".

dave-you know that is a lie. Any comment on wages increasing was linked to DATA(something you should check out once in a while) - not emotional rhetoric like you use.
Are you suggesting that 80% of the market is $6 cleaning and waiting jobs? Are you trying to suggest that the job growth, as reported Friday, in the Service sector are these $6/hr jobs?

dave -the gig is up. The tired worn out excuses about the economy aren't going to work anymore. First it was a "jobloss" recovery, then it was a "jobless" recovery, then "not enough jobs" recovery, and all the while people were using the "crappy job" recovery excuse that they have to solely rely on now. But no one has ever been able to show that these jobs are "crappy" or minimum wage jobs. Sure - alot of Service sector jobs pay less than the old OVERPAID Manufacturing jobs but that doesn't mean they are "crappy".

Anyway - back to the DATA INDEX

CkG

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: CWRMadcat

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Services Growth Hits Record in March

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Growth in the U.S. services sector hit a record high in March, well above expectations, a report showed on Monday.

The Institute for Supply Management's non-manufacturing index surged to 65.8 in March from 60.8 in February. Wall Street economists had forecast a rise to 61.5. A number above 50 indicates growth.

The survey's employment index rose in March to 53.9 from 52.7 in February. Growth in demand for new orders rose to 62.8 in March from 60.3 in February.

The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80 percent of the U.S. economy.

I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

Because you and others bleat endlessly about losing manufacturing jobs - you know...the only ones that are GOOD according to the way people talk around here.

So are you turning over a new leaf today dave? Ready to see that the Economy isn't "suck"?

CkG

CkG

"The services sector includes everything from restaurants and hotels to banks and airlines, and accounts for about 80percent of the U.S. economy."

We're done as a Manufacturing Powerhouse, so why do you continue to post about any "gains" in the Manufacturing sector???

He's posting about gains in the service sector...what are you talking about? Shouldn't ANY productivity gains, regardless of sector, be welcomed?

Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Clearly that is not the case with$6 hr cleaning Hotel rooms and waiting tables.
No offense to those doing such necessary services, it's just that they are it as far as the job "growth".[/quote]
I don't think I've ever seen Cad post anything about how jobs are the best they've ever been. I might be wrong, but I don't think so.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Another take on this Service Index Report

CkG

 

[dirtboy]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

Agreed. Dave & Co say American's are too good for this kind of work. Their time is better spent at home posting doom and gloom on the Internet.

 

[alchemize]

Oh no! Look, I.T. is in trouble, why Dave can't get a job!

IT Spending Remains Strong for the Quarter

CIOs expect IT budgets to grow 7.3 percent over the next year, according to the latest CIO Magazine Tech Poll...

In another show of confidence that businesses are back on track, CIOs are actively hiring IT staff again, although preventing burnout and motivating their overworked department remain among their top challenges. CIO magazine?s annual IT Staffing survey of 340 IT executives, conducted in January of this year, found that more than one-third of CIOs surveyed are actively hiring and an additional 26 percent will begin hiring in the next six months. The most needed skills continue to be application development, project management and database management, with demand for project management rising 23 percent from our staffing survey conducted six months ago. Demand for networking personnel is also on the rise, while the demand for help desk skills appears to be weakening.

While I'm not predicting a booming economy just yet, I think the job growth is going to settle in nicely. Dave will now start whining about interest rates as they go up...I might whine a little too if my new job comes through and I have to lose my 4.75%/15 year mortgage...

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: dirtboy

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
I wonder when people will quit demanding more services so we can get rid of these "crappy jobs".

Agreed. Dave & Co say American's are too good for this kind of work. Their time is better spent at home posting doom and gloom on the Internet.

That's right. What we need are more [insert minority name (hint: they live down south and start with an M)] to perform those crap jobs! That must be what Dave is trying to say

 

[BaliBabyDoc]

Why pay someone a high wage when they barely know the English language?

Why should uneducated people make lots of money?

How dare you insult President Bush!

 

[tallest1]

Originally posted by: dirtboy

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Why pay someone a high wage when they barely know the English language?

Why should uneducated people make lots of money?

1) There are folks who barely know the English language and get good jobs & high wages (at least in the South) but hopefully, those numbers will increase when Bush's controversial immigration law goes into effect.

2) Many uneducated people make lots of money, they're called execs.

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: tallest1

Originally posted by: dirtboy

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Why pay someone a high wage when they barely know the English language?

Why should uneducated people make lots of money?

1) There are folks who barely know the English language and get good jobs & high wages (at least in the South) but hopefully, those numbers will increase when Bush's controversial immigration law goes into effect.

2) Many uneducated people make lots of money, they're called execs.

"Many uneducated people make lots of money, they're called execs"

Ain't that the truth. But they have smart Lawyers.

 

[dirtboy]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: tallest1

Originally posted by: dirtboy

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Why pay someone a high wage when they barely know the English language?

Why should uneducated people make lots of money?

1) There are folks who barely know the English language and get good jobs & high wages (at least in the South) but hopefully, those numbers will increase when Bush's controversial immigration law goes into effect.

2) Many uneducated people make lots of money, they're called execs.

"Many uneducated people make lots of money, they're called execs"

Ain't that the truth. But they have smart Lawyers.

I love how you little libbies dance around the question in order to avoid it. No wonder Dave & Co can't find a job. They probably get asked a question during the interview and then drops some spin-laden answer that is completely irrelevent to the question!

So if execs are so dumb, what's you're guys excuse for not being one?

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: tallest1

Originally posted by: dirtboy

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Because CAD "bleats endlessly" that the jobs are highest educated and highest paying wages ever.

Why pay someone a high wage when they barely know the English language?

Why should uneducated people make lots of money?

1) There are folks who barely know the English language and get good jobs & high wages (at least in the South) but hopefully, those numbers will increase when Bush's controversial immigration law goes into effect.

2) Many uneducated people make lots of money, they're called execs.

"Many uneducated people make lots of money, they're called execs"

Ain't that the truth. But they have smart Lawyers.

Dave, where is your undergraduate from, and what was your GPA? Where is your Master's from, and what was your GPA? And any post-masters education?

 

[tallest1]

Originally posted by: dirtboy

I love how you little libbies dance around the question in order to avoid it. No wonder Dave & Co can't find a job. They probably get asked a question during the interview and then drops some spin-laden answer that is completely irrelevent to the question!

So if execs are so dumb, what's you're guys excuse for not being one?

I 'danced around the question' because frankly I have no argument with what CAD posted. I just threw a lil humor to liven things up. And to answer your question, its somewhat of a half-joke. I'm not going to hijack the thread here but come on, you know there are some stupid supervisors and execs out there.