• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

More Clinton Campaign Contribution Scandel on 20/20. Where is McCain now?

Texmaster

Banned
Many of you will dismiss their behavior but you shouldn't if you are truely for Campaign Finance reform.

<<<Campaign finance reform crusader Sen. John McCain should be outraged today, what with Friday night's ABC News &quot;20/20&quot; investigative report on new charges that Bill and Hillary Clinton continued to break current campaign finance laws right through last year's election.

Surely McCain's blood is boiling right now at news that the Clintons hid over $1 million in campaign contributions from federal election officials.

And undoubtedly the Arizona senator will want to interrogate for himself Hollywood producer Peter Paul, who gave &quot;20/20's&quot; Brian Ross a walking tour through stunning video footage of the Clintons hobnobbing with Hollywood's glitterati, as well as Mr. Paul and his wife, during the August 2000 multimillion-dollar gala fund-raiser he bankrolled with the unreported cash.

Certainly the irrepressible campaign finance reformer is planning a news conference right now to demand that the Ashcroft Justice Department hold the Clintons legally accountable for such a flagrant abuse of the campaign finance laws already on the books.

Or not.

In fact, if his past behavior is any indication, there won't be any McCain news conference or call for hearings or even an angry statement from the campaign finance reform champion on the new Clinton allegations.

Remember the Arizona maverick's GOP presidential primary campaign boast that he was going to &quot;beat Al Gore like a drum&quot; over Clinton-Gore campaign finance abuses in the fall campaign? McCain's vaunted drum beating never quite materialized - at least not against Clinton and Gore.

Old news, you say? Perhaps.

But what the Hollywood media mogul told &quot;20/20&quot; about the Clintons last night is hot off the presses.

&quot;They took the money. They knew that it had a value to them. They promised to do certain things. They reneged on their promises,&quot; Paul claimed, in an interview that should have Sen. McCain's ears ringing.

Reporter Ross, who spent six weeks researching the story for &quot;20/20,&quot; reported:

&quot;In total [Paul] estimates he has canceled checks and other documents showing more than $1.5 million in direct and so-called in-kind contributions to support the Hillary campaign last year. Yet only about $500,000 of that appears in the federal election records filed for her campaign attributed to the various companies Paul is connected with.&quot;

Paul, who is now being represented by Judicial Watch, filed a civil lawsuit in connection with the fund-raiser in California state court last month.

&quot;They knew I gave money,&quot; Paul told &quot;20/20.&quot; &quot;They knew approximately how much I gave. And then they put me in jeopardy by lying about the contribution to the federal government, to the people of New York - everybody.&quot;

The Hollywood producer detailed for &quot;20/20&quot; some of the expenses he covered for what was billed as &quot;Hollywood's Farewell to Bill Clinton&quot;:

&quot;I paid Wolfgang Puck $68,000 to cater the dinner. I paid for Cher's jet - I think it was $30,000. I paid for the tents, the invitations - there were a lot of things to pay for.&quot;

&quot;The night brought in a huge windfall for the Hillary campaign, thanks in large part to the checkbook of Peter Paul,&quot; acknowledged &quot;20/20.&quot;

ABC News also uncovered even more evidence of Clinton campaign finance lawbreaking.

&quot;Seated right behind the Clintons [at the gala fund-raiser] was Japanese businessman Tendo Oto, an associate of Paul's who gave Paul $27,000 to attend the fund-raiser,&quot; Ross reported, noting that Oto's gift to the Clintons through Paul was illegal.

&quot;Sure enough, two months later, there was Oto, attending the state dinner with the prime minister of India,&quot; Ross said, as &quot;20/20&quot; rolled a clip of the Japanese businessman strolling through the White House.

Just days after the August event, the Washington Post uncovered an ancient felony conviction on Paul's record. The Clintons' reaction? They returned $2,000 to Paul and suggested that was the totality of his contributions to Mrs. Clinton's campaign.

Paul told &quot;20/20,&quot; &quot;What they said was, 'Oh, who? Peter Paul - oh, I think he was a producer of the event. He gave the $2,000, we forgot about it. But we're sending it back. We wouldn't take any money from him.&quot;

When &quot;20/20&quot; confronted Mrs. Clinton directly on Paul's allegations, she told reporter Ross, &quot;I'm just not going to comment on it. It's not anything that I'm going to have anything to say about.&quot;

What about Sen. McCain, who'll be on &quot;Meet the Press&quot; Sunday to complain that his campaign finance reform bill was shot down in the House last week? Will he have anything to say about Peter Paul's campaign finance allegations against Hillary? >>>
 
Interesting how desperate conservatives want to link McCain to the Clintons. Interesting how the conservatives just can?t leave Clinton alone. When McCain proved to be outside the control of big religion and big business, the RepubliKlans did everything they could to make sure Bush won the primaries. They can see that GWB will have a hard time in ?04, so they are stepping up the attacks now on potential rivals both inside and outside of the party. They keep trying to equate Democrat==Clinton so that when the next elections roll around, the stupid Americans will elect GW Puppet again.

And now they are trying to equate Democrat==Clinton==McCain. How sad. What are you afraid of, Tominator? That the GOP will actually have to be held accountable for how they collect money? Here is a big secret: the Democrats would be hurt a lot worse than Republicans under McCain/Fiengold, considering how both parties raise money. I think that his legislation does not go far enough; but we will not see changes because the pigs on BOTH sides have decided that whoring themselves out to the special interests is more important than having a shred of decency.

Tominator, if you think that GWB?s campaign had no illegal contributions, you are even dumber than your posts. Next you are going to complain about how the Clintons will just not leave us all alone, since they are in the news every day.

And I repeat again, for the hundredth time, that this is just another example of how the ?liberal? media has treated the Clintons. Liberal media my ass.
 
Sorry slick,
Texmaster != Tominator

I saw the report on 20/20, you can't really paint this off as a conservative tactic against old Bill.
 
McCain is the desperate one here! This demonstrates once again that enforcement of current law is needed BEFORE any new laws are passed.

That is the main argument against McCain/Feingold imho.
 
Just more evidence that money can buy anything - including &quot;justice&quot; and even the presidency. If you have lots of money, you can afford huge campaigns; if not, you might as well not bother.
 
I REALLY don't see why McCain had any reason to be brought into the article except to further link him to the Democratic party, which is actually the obvious focus of the article. The emphasis should be on the Clintons' failing to fully disclose their campaign contributions, but that is merely the framework for an assault on McCain's inaction. The article begins with McCain and ends with McCain; the title of this thread should be &quot;Weak Conservative Article Makes Futile Effort to Bash McCain, Press is Stupid.&quot;

I sure as hell am not a McCain fan as I clearly recall his statements against people of Asian descent, but he really does not need to be connected to this problem that is the Clintons'.
 
Back
Top