Moment and torque?

soydios

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2006
2,708
0
0
Moment of inertia = angular equivalent of mass
A spinning disk or ring has inertia, yes? But, this inertia is different from linear inertia. The "mass" that causes angular inertia is dependent on both the mass of the object, its radius, and the distribution of mass within the object. To find the inertia of an object in angular (circular) motion, multiply the angular speed (often expressed in radians per second) times the moment of inertia.

Torque = angular equivalent of force
Torque is angular force. It's dependent on both force applied and the radius of the lever used to apply it. For example, a bigger wrench puts more torque around a central point (the bolt) than a smaller wrench.
 

EvilYoda

Lifer
Apr 1, 2001
21,198
9
81
Oh, there's plenty of hair-pulling difference...I'll take calc/diff eq/linear algebra any day over that stuff :p
 

dighn

Lifer
Aug 12, 2001
22,820
4
81
Originally posted by: soydios
Moment of inertia = angular equivalent of mass
A spinning disk or ring has inertia, yes? But, this inertia is different from linear inertia. The "mass" that causes angular inertia is dependent on both the mass of the object, its radius, and the distribution of mass within the object. To find the inertia of an object in angular (circular) motion, multiply the angular speed (often expressed in radians per second) times the moment of inertia.

Torque = angular equivalent of force
Torque is angular force. It's dependent on both force applied and the radius of the lever used to apply it. For example, a bigger wrench puts more torque around a central point (the bolt) than a smaller wrench.

moment of inertia is different. as far as I was taught and from what I can find, moment is torque, at least in terms of mechanics.
 

NatePo717

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2005
3,392
4
81
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Vector Mechanics for engineers says M sub O = r x F = tau

I have that book... By Beer?

I think of moments as being used to replace point loads at a distance mainly with beams and rods.

I think of torques as being used with gears, pulleys, or other rotational objects.

 

LordMorpheus

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2002
6,871
1
0
When a mechanical engineer talks about the moment in a beam he's generally talking about the bending moment (the torque applied to and in the beam causing it to bend).

Torque (though mathematically the same thing) is used to talk about torque on the beam causing it to twist.

I've got two or three texts that do things that way. As long as you keep track of your vectors you don't really need to make the distinction, though.
 

pray4mojo

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2003
3,647
0
0
Originally posted by: NatePo717
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Vector Mechanics for engineers says M sub O = r x F = tau

I have that book... By Beer?

I think of moments as being used to replace point loads at a distance mainly with beams and rods.

I think of torques as being used with gears, pulleys, or other rotational objects.

I use that book too. Torque isn't in the index. :shocked:
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: pray4mojo
Originally posted by: NatePo717
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Vector Mechanics for engineers says M sub O = r x F = tau

I have that book... By Beer?

I think of moments as being used to replace point loads at a distance mainly with beams and rods.

I think of torques as being used with gears, pulleys, or other rotational objects.

I use that book too. Torque isn't in the index. :shocked:

Same book here too:D
 

FleshLight

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2004
6,883
0
71
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: pray4mojo
Originally posted by: NatePo717
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Vector Mechanics for engineers says M sub O = r x F = tau

I have that book... By Beer?

I think of moments as being used to replace point loads at a distance mainly with beams and rods.

I think of torques as being used with gears, pulleys, or other rotational objects.

I use that book too. Torque isn't in the index. :shocked:

Same book here too:D

I think its the de facto standard for mechanics. My professor says he used the 3rd edition of the book 50 years ago when he took the same class :confused: