MoH EA Servers suck donkey balls!

[Baasha]

Anyone have the same issues as me regarding MoH??

I just got the game and it lags like a bitch.

And, 8/10 servers are useless. I click on them and "Join" but the stupid reticule just rotates and nothing happens. WTF?!?

Tier 1 my ass!

 

[pontifex]

Sounds like typical DICE/EA games...

 

[VulgarDisplay]

The hit detection is so good that people can shoot about 30 feet to your side and still kill you. That's what pisses me off about the game. 1 hit snipers anywhere on the body are also quite frustrating.

 

[Barfo]

lol!

 

[RavenSEAL]

what a surprise...

 

[paperfist]

So how's the SP then?

 

[Barfo]

 

[minmaster]

lol this was so predictable

 

[JSt0rm]

what did you expect?

 

[SergeC]

EA......shocking that it's not working right, LMFAO.

 

[erikistired]

multiplayer is about the only thing i'm enjoying right now. not sure why you are lagging so much, or having problems getting on.

edit: apparently they are having server browser issues and are working on it. also, misread part of the OP.

 

[pontifex]

multiplayer is about the only thing i'm enjoying right now. not sure why you are lagging so much, or having problems getting on. is it possible the 8/10 servers have 2 reserved spots?

edit: apparently they are having server browser issues and are working on it.

How many games have EA/DICE put out now and they still can't make the server browser work on release? BC2 is the last DICE game I'll ever buy and I shouldn't have even bought that.

 

[brownstone]

Is it possible the 8/10 servers have 2 reserved spots?

OP, are you saying servers with 8 slots out of 10 freeze or 8 out of 10 servers freeze? :hmm:

Either way, that really sucks.

 

[erikistired]

How many games have EA/DICE put out now and they still can't make the server browser work on release? BC2 is the last DICE game I'll ever buy and I shouldn't have even bought that.

no idea. it's working fine for me, but that message was up today so i thought i'd pass it on for the OP.

 

[Baasha]

So how's the SP then?

Just finished the SP campaign.

The game is ridiculously short; I mean, like barely over 4 hours for the SP campaign.

The MP sucked donkey balls (servers) so I just started playing SP. I'm going to try MP this weekend again.

I feel like I've been bent over and totally ripped off by EA / Danger Close / DICE.

Piss be upon them!

 

[Baasha]

The hit detection is so good that people can shoot about 30 feet to your side and still kill you. That's what pisses me off about the game. 1 hit snipers anywhere on the body are also quite frustrating.

^lolz

The game actually feels about 5 years old; like a 2005 game.

FEAR was more intense and the graphics were actually better.

The lighting is cool although at times it's way too bright but the guns, AI, gore, missions, story are all sub-par.

Highly disappointing. Goodbye $60...

 

[paperfist]

Just finished the SP campaign.

The game is ridiculously short; I mean, like barely over 4 hours for the SP campaign.

The MP sucked donkey balls (servers) so I just started playing SP. I'm going to try MP this weekend again.

I feel like I've been bent over and totally ripped off by EA / Danger Close / DICE.

Piss be upon them!

4 hours isn't much to sink your teeth into. Is the quality high?

I looked at the Gamespot review and came away thinking SP looked kind of fun. But after reading some of the last reviews and buying that specific game I can't help but not want to trust review sites anymore.

 

[minmaster]

major gaming site reviews can't be trusted anymore...
i mean look at civ5, metacritic score is like 90 but it's total trash and a biggest waste of money ever.

 

[paperfist]

major gaming site reviews can't be trusted anymore...
i mean look at civ5, metacritic score is like 90 but it's total trash and a biggest waste of money ever.

Yeah that's what I was getting at. On the same token though look at the civfanatics forum, you have a lot of supporters of Civ V and a lot of haters. So does it come down fanboisim or people genuinely liking the game because they have different tastes?

 

[minmaster]

i don't honestly get the ones who like the game. i've been a civ addict since civ1 and civ5 is the first game in the series i can't bring myself to play. and to think they had the audacity to charge $10 for the babylon civ... aargh

 

[Vdubchaos]

i don't honestly get the ones who like the game. i've been a civ addict since civ1 and civ5 is the first game in the series i can't bring myself to play. and to think they had the audacity to charge $10 for the babylon civ... aargh

x2

I tried Civ5 demo......meh

Civ4 has been sitting ont he shelf for YEARS. It's a cool game and all, but once you play it for a while it gets old quick.....and once it gets old, it's pretty much done.

Anyways, I got MOH as a gift....played about 5 min of single (felt really weird) and haven't even bothered playing Multi after the pathetic Beta (not sure if I ever will to be honest) cause people are telling me that the maps are as horrible as beta (small with bottlenecks)

 

[BHetrick]

I like MoH, but at the same time it's also frustrating. I like the gameplay style; simple warfare. I don't need all the perks, killstreaks, gadgets, ac130's, nukes, etc. I just want to play the game as a soldier.

I like the maps; smaller than BC2 but bigger than MW2. The detail is great and most are sniper friendly, and that just adds to the intensity. You simply CAN NOT run and gun in this game. You have to check your corners.

But then there are those "wtf" moments. Being killed by an emeny I opened up on first. Those kill shots that come out of nowhere. Being killed behind solid surfaces.

Seeing how it's just released, we have to imagine that there are going to be patches to address some of the issues. So, imo, I felt it's worth it. For me, it's not about it costing $60. It's about how much I'll play it.

I still play BC2 more, but the maps are well beyond stale. I was ready for some variant, and MoH offers that.

 

[Corporate Thug]

I like MoH, but at the same time it's also frustrating. I like the gameplay style; simple warfare. I don't need all the perks, killstreaks, gadgets, ac130's, nukes, etc. I just want to play the game as a soldier.

I like the maps; smaller than BC2 but bigger than MW2. The detail is great and most are sniper friendly, and that just adds to the intensity. You simply CAN NOT run and gun in this game. You have to check your corners.

But then there are those "wtf" moments. Being killed by an emeny I opened up on first. Those kill shots that come out of nowhere. Being killed behind solid surfaces.

Seeing how it's just released, we have to imagine that there are going to be patches to address some of the issues. So, imo, I felt it's worth it. For me, it's not about it costing $60. It's about how much I'll play it.

I still play BC2 more, but the maps are well beyond stale. I was ready for some variant, and MoH offers that.

the most ridiculous part is shooting an enemy and all it does is slow his stride...then it takes 5 more body shots to put him down.

 

[BHetrick]

Yeah, it's odd. Sometimes it's half a clip, others it's a shot or two.

 

[buzzsaw13]

not surprising from EA, I have a copy of BC2 that has been sitting on the floor because I get booted out of every game after 2-3 minutes of playing.