• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

MNF: Bet for or against the spread (Rams -11.0)

Mr N8

Diamond Member
What do you think? Good bet? Bulger has been hooking up with Bruce and Holt quite well. 11 point spread is fairly large.
 
I say go with the Rams. I know it's a big spread, but the Falcons are absolutely horrible right now without Vick.
 
falcons...too large of a spread to cover. but i would warn you that i suck at betting on sports. went 0 for 2 last week.
 
Originally posted by: neovan
falcons...too large of a spread to cover. but i would warn you that i suck at betting on sports. went 0 for 2 last week.

LOL! I'm still tempted to take the Rams and the under, after seeing what Gus did to Atlanta. Also looking at the fact that Atlanta has scored 97, but allowed 139 points, but St Louis has only allowed 84 points, and have scored 100.
 
I think it will be the Rams and over (46). MNF tend to be blowout for some reason.
Atlanta I think will be smoked.
The only game I was sure about last week was Miami beating the Jaguars by at least 4 points.
 
I got a feeling for the Falcons beating the spread.

But then I thought I was going for the 49ers to make the spread, and good old butterfingers Hurst drops the ball and I got my very own "perfect" 0-5 weekend on wagers.
 
Originally posted by: brtspears2
I got a feeling for the Falcons beating the spread.

But then I thought I was going for the 49ers to make the spread, and good old butterfingers Hurst drops the ball and I got my very own "perfect" 0-5 weekend on wagers.


Wasn't Seattle favored by 3.5 or 2.5 points. If you picked SF, you should have beaten the spread, unless you picked them to win?

 
damn, u guys r really high on the falcons. just remember... the titans (at home) were favors by 9 over the texans. titans ended up winning by 21. i'm not saying the rams are the titans, but lets face it... the falcons (without vick) sucks worse then the texans.

now... with that off my chest.... i declare that i am too chicken to place any bets on this game.
 
Well, I'm glad I didn't really listen to most of you! 🙂 A little padding for the wallet coming off of my gut reaction.
 
Originally posted by: neovan
falcons...too large of a spread to cover. but i would warn you that i suck at betting on sports. went 0 for 2 last week.

damn...better stay away from vegas. 😱
 
Originally posted by: Shlong
Continue to pick against Atlanta until Vick comes back.

10-13-2003 Rams send Falcons to new low

``I really didn't feel like I played an NFL game tonight,'' Bulger said. ``I hardly got hit.''

``That's probably the worst game as a team I've ever seen in my life,'' Johnson said
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Battle for last: Falcons / Lions
 
Back
Top