- Mar 31, 2001
- 13,749
- 6
- 81
Originally posted by: KLin
They have to play the game to determine who will have home field advantage in the world series.
Originally posted by: acheron2112
Problem with "better record" is that the teams facing each other in the WS for the most part play entirely different sets of teams, so their records aren't directly comparable. If the leagues are roughly even, then maybe that doesn't matter, but frankly the AL is pretty obviously the better league nowadays, so the NL team sets their record against an easier set of teams.
Originally posted by: GG02
Originally posted by: acheron2112
Problem with "better record" is that the teams facing each other in the WS for the most part play entirely different sets of teams, so their records aren't directly comparable. If the leagues are roughly even, then maybe that doesn't matter, but frankly the AL is pretty obviously the better league nowadays, so the NL team sets their record against an easier set of teams.
Good point. Perhaps just using the two teams head to head record? It just is amusing to me that 2 teams are battling for the right to home field, when maybe 1/10th of the players on the respective teams will be involved in the series that it would be affecting.
Originally posted by: acheron2112
Problem with "better record" is that the teams facing each other in the WS for the most part play entirely different sets of teams, so their records aren't directly comparable. If the leagues are roughly even, then maybe that doesn't matter, but frankly the AL is pretty obviously the better league nowadays, so the NL team sets their record against an easier set of teams.
That said, the "winner of the all-star game" thing is kind of stupid too, so I don't really have a solution other than going back to the alternate-years thing.
But yeah, they'd probably just play it the next day, which is still part of the break. If it rained *again*, I don't know.. it's not like there's another day where all the teams are free.
Originally posted by: Toasthead
I dont think it rains enough anywhere in July to warrant a rained out game. those fields can handle a LOT of rain
Originally posted by: Mr Pickles
Originally posted by: Toasthead
I dont think it rains enough anywhere in July to warrant a rained out game. those fields can handle a LOT of rain
It has nothing to do with the fields. a wet glove on a pitcher with a wet ball being hurled at 93 mph changes gameplay and might actually make it dangerous for the hitter. They normally don't call it if its a light rain, instead they call it when they determine that a pop fly might be hard to catch because the rain may make it hard to see.
Originally posted by: Toasthead
Originally posted by: Mr Pickles
Originally posted by: Toasthead
I dont think it rains enough anywhere in July to warrant a rained out game. those fields can handle a LOT of rain
It has nothing to do with the fields. a wet glove on a pitcher with a wet ball being hurled at 93 mph changes gameplay and might actually make it dangerous for the hitter. They normally don't call it if its a light rain, instead they call it when they determine that a pop fly might be hard to catch because the rain may make it hard to see.
The average lifespan of a baseball is something like 6 pitches.
Originally posted by: Toasthead
I dont think it rains enough anywhere in July to warrant a rained out game. those fields can handle a LOT of rain
