Hi
I am part updating my old computer. I have the following now:
Intel 865 GBF moBo
P4 3.0 GHz Prescott 800 FSB
I have two memory sticks of different frequencies with me.
512 Mb 400 Hz DDR (Not sure of the latencies etc. I guess it's a cheapo brand and slow ram)
256 mb 266 Hz DDR (Again cheapo)
The system defaults to 266 Hz. My question is:
1. Is it better to run the system with only 512 Mb at 400 Hz or having 768 mb at 266 hz?
2. Is the performance jump of going to dual channel memory by buying another 512 Mb @ 400 hz significant? I am not asking about performance gain from 256 Mb of additional ram, but from going dual channel.
3. If were to buy another 512 mb Ram @ 400 hz, should I be better of keeping the 256 Mb @ 266 hz idle or is 1280 Mb @ 266 Hz is better?
4. Do high performance memory with lesser latency worth the extra money?
Sorry if I sound lame. I am a total newbie and I am not keen to spend more at this time.
Thanks in advance for all suggestions.
I am part updating my old computer. I have the following now:
Intel 865 GBF moBo
P4 3.0 GHz Prescott 800 FSB
I have two memory sticks of different frequencies with me.
512 Mb 400 Hz DDR (Not sure of the latencies etc. I guess it's a cheapo brand and slow ram)
256 mb 266 Hz DDR (Again cheapo)
The system defaults to 266 Hz. My question is:
1. Is it better to run the system with only 512 Mb at 400 Hz or having 768 mb at 266 hz?
2. Is the performance jump of going to dual channel memory by buying another 512 Mb @ 400 hz significant? I am not asking about performance gain from 256 Mb of additional ram, but from going dual channel.
3. If were to buy another 512 mb Ram @ 400 hz, should I be better of keeping the 256 Mb @ 266 hz idle or is 1280 Mb @ 266 Hz is better?
4. Do high performance memory with lesser latency worth the extra money?
Sorry if I sound lame. I am a total newbie and I am not keen to spend more at this time.
Thanks in advance for all suggestions.