• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mitt Romney's anti-laissez faire platform.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
http://useconomy.about.com/od/fiscalpolicy/p/Mitt_Romney.htm

The link above includes the long list of failures we can expect from a Romney Administration.

First of all, his trade policy is disastrous. He wants a managed trade agreement, then tariffs on China made imports which are probably better than things made in the U.S. They'd be a helluva lot cheaper too, if we let them devalue their currency.

Second of all, it seems like he wants to reduce tax rates solely for more government revenue, which is why you shouldn't want to reduce tax rates. He proposes reducing the corporate tax by 10 percentage points which is not more than 30% less than what it is now.

Third, he wants a weak currency. If China doesn't stengthen theirs, then he'll keep interest rates low to reduce the strength of the dollar. He's already said he doesn't mind Bernanke, and even if there is a move for a gold standard during his presidency, he'll just reinstate the phony gold exchange standard.

Fourth, he supports the Federal war on drugs. That's anti-market. Think about how many real green jobs ending the war on drugs would create.

Fifth, he raiesed taxes and expenditures as Governor of Massachusetts. I know he doesn't consider "user fees" to be taxes, but they are whether he wants to call them taxes or not. That's a good indicator of how he'll perform as President IMO.

6th, he doesn't want to reduce military spending, nor does he propose abolition of any departments.

Isn't this reason for concern since he's not any more pro-market than Obama (or at least not enough to make any tangible difference)?

I think he hates the market and he's trying to get it blamed for socialism's failures. If he's not trying to get the market blamed, then he truly knows nothing about economics.
 
Founder of a private equity company that hates the free market. I think I've heard it all now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top