Third use of "Stochastic terrorism" I've seen this week. I think this one is going to be big, it's going to make into the debates at some point in the near future. I'm looking at Harris for the first use, then expect CNN to run with it.Stochastic terrorism, this is a signal to the unstable supporters to go after democratic politicians
I'm getting a feeling that you actually have more of a problem with people naming the thing rather than with the actual thing. Any reason for that?Third use of "Stochastic terrorism" I've seen this week. I think this one is going to be big, it's going to make into the debates at some point in the near future. I'm looking at Harris for the first use, then expect CNN to run with it.
I'm getting a feeling that you actually have more of a problem with people naming the thing rather than with the actual thing. Any reason for that?
It was like when people called the concentration camps concentration camps.
The word stochastic is a broader meaning than is being used in the context of "stochastic terrorism" and using the word in this manner leads to confusion. Contrary to Greenman's speculation, I don't expect the term to come up in a debate. Having a candidate attempt to explain the concept would be entertaining though.I'm getting a feeling that you actually have more of a problem with people naming the thing rather than with the actual thing. Any reason for that?
It was like when people called the concentration camps concentration camps.
I'm getting a feeling that you actually have more of a problem with people naming the thing rather than with the actual thing. Any reason for that?
It was like when people called the concentration camps concentration camps.
Third use of "Stochastic terrorism" I've seen this week. I think this one is going to be big, it's going to make into the debates at some point in the near future. I'm looking at Harris for the first use, then expect CNN to run with it.
I'm getting a feeling that you actually have more of a problem with people naming the thing rather than with the actual thing. Any reason for that?
It was like when people called the concentration camps concentration camps.
You are a hopeless troll.The media controls you.
No, it is amazing how heartless people like you are!!Didn't know if you knew this or not, but people die every day. Truly amazing how sensitive people are.
The word stochastic is a broader meaning than is being used in the context of "stochastic terrorism" and using the word in this manner leads to confusion. Contrary to Greenman's speculation, I don't expect the term to come up in a debate. Having a candidate attempt to explain the concept would be entertaining though.
A stochastic process has an underlying distribution determined by environmental variables, many of which are also functionally stochastic. What the fascists are doing is manipulating some of the environmental variables (information inputs in this case) to create a bigger tail in the violence-prone end of the distribution. Having a candidate try to articulate that any better than I just did would be really difficult.
Third use of "Stochastic terrorism" I've seen this week. I think this one is going to be big, it's going to make into the debates at some point in the near future. I'm looking at Harris for the first use, then expect CNN to run with it.
The media controls you.
That's why Moscow Mitch is a traitor to this country.Amazing how MoscowBitch takes pride in being a massive obstructionist when he has constantly complained about Democrats obstructing. It's like he isn't honest or something.
