• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mistrial For Alabama Officer Charged After Assaulting Elderly Indian Man

Indus

Lifer
from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ssaulting-indian-man_55f34c51e4b077ca094f3942

A U.S. judge declared a mistrial on Friday in the case of an Alabama policeman on trial for violating an Indian man's rights by throwing him to the ground and injuring him badly during an encounter captured on video, local media reported.

Eric Parker, 26, was tried in federal court on accusations that he used unreasonable force while a police officer in Madison, Alabama, during the February incident.

A jury in Huntsville, Alabama deadlocked on whether to convict or acquit him of a single charge of depriving an Indian grandfather of his civil rights, according to television station WHNT and local news website AL.com.

If convicted, Parker would have faced up to 10 years in prison.

The case involving 58-year-old Sureshbhai Patel, who did not speak English, drew international attention at a time when a series of killings of unarmed black men by police in the United States has raised questions about law enforcement's use of force.

Patel is not expected to fully recover from the injuries he sustained when Parker abruptly flipped him onto the ground, his lawyer has said.

Testifying in his own defense during the trial this week, Parker said he was following his training and felt he had no other option, television station WAFF reported. He said the injuries were an accident.

Madison police released video of the encounter, recorded from inside a patrol vehicle.

The department apologized for Parker's actions and recommended his termination, which he has challenged.

The grandfather had been on a morning walk about two weeks after moving from India to northern Alabama to help his son's family care for a young child.

Seriously? This video is not evidence enough?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/1...d-faces-termination-after-allegedly-injuring/

Is our justice system so infected by prejudice that this video as evidence is still not enough to convict a bad cop?
 
Is our justice system so infected by prejudice that this video as evidence is still not enough to convict a bad cop?

Prejudice? Your barking up the wrong tree.

Our people, and thus our justice system, is authoritarian enough where might makes right. Blue wall, etc. Not far removed from India or even ancient Rome's caste system.
 
It's tough to find enough people to serve on a jury in Alabama that think minorities are human beings.
 
It's tough to find enough people to serve on a jury in Alabama that think minorities are human beings.
I don't think I'd go that far, but I would guess that too many think that cops needing leeway and discretion means cops can do whatever in the execution of their duties, which is a poor excuse for blatantly violating someone's civil rights. But to the mistrial, I just don't understand what mitigating factors kept several jurors at 'not guilty'.
 
I guess the cop apologists can declare victory now right? The system worked, an innocent cop wasn't convicted, it was all an accident? Right?

/sarcasm

I guess it's hard in Alabama to find 12 non-biased people. Amazing that the cops defense was that he lost his balance....thought our apologists assure us that cops don't lie?
 
"He said the injuries were an accident."

I guess we all get to use that excuse then?

The brutally violent take down of the elderly man that caused the injuries didn't appear to be an accident.

Was his defense really that "his training kicked in", meaning that they are trained, and the policy is, to brutally bodyslam elderly people for completely non-violent action of not following the officers orders, that the officer knew he couldn't understand? Really?
 
It's tough to find enough people to serve on a jury in Alabama that think minorities are human beings.

Hate to bust your bigoted bubble but everyone I've talked to, around here, thinks that the cop should go to jail. I don't know what happened in court but, as they say around here, "That shit ain't right".
 
Do you all even know what a mistrial is? It means the proceedings were stopped because of some error it is not a dismissal of the case. The prosecutors can start over.
 
Do you all even know what a mistrial is? It means the proceedings were stopped because of some error it is not a dismissal of the case. The prosecutors can start over.

Yes but did you read it wasn't an error, it was a deadlocked jury.

A jury in Huntsville, Alabama deadlocked on whether to convict or acquit him of a single charge of depriving an Indian grandfather of his civil rights, according to television station WHNT and local news website AL.com.
 
Yes but did you read it wasn't an error, it was a deadlocked jury.

Which means the judge decided that there was no point in continuing the trial since there would not be a unanimous decision. A hung jury means the defendant is neither guilty nor innocent. The prosecutors can start over.
 
What kind of charge is that? "Deprived of Civil Rights".
It's a charge that came out of the civil rights era, when local, state all-white juries were repeatedly acquitting lynchers. The federal government stepped in and started charging murders under civil rights violations. The federal government would have a hard time pressing assault charges when a crime wasn't committed on federal property. However, the civil rights violation charges can be brought to bear.
 
I'm not an apologist or anything near that, but let me say this. This happened in my town, around people I know, and 99% of the town thinks the cop is totally guilty. Madison Alabama isn't a backwards town, and I'm honestly sad that it's getting this reputation because of this story. Even our super-conservatives we have around the town think that the officer is guilty, but the system is twisted. A broken system is what let the officer walk free, not all the cops in the department, not the laws surrounding it, and for sure not the citizens of the town.

In the end, the blame falls on us as a city/state/nation for not supporting those that do speak out. What is in it for a good cop to speak out, only to get slandered for it, when the citizens of his town will eventually forget about him? You can't say that good cops need to stand up to the bad ones unless you're willing to do it yourself. And while I believe many would, imagine what a tiny fraction that is of the U.S. population.

It's the same reason people don't vote for third-party candidates. They're scared they won't be heard, and no one wants to be first, and we end up in silence.
 
I am just following all these cop trials so that I know what standard of proof to use if I am on a jury and a cop is the victim.
 
404 Error Not Found

As I said already... it doesn't have to be an error by the prosecution. A hung jury will lead to a mistrial and it means the same thing. It is not a dismissal of the case.

When there is a hung jury the prosecution can retry the case in front of a different jury.

Sheesh... are people really this dense?

When the cop get his case dismissed... then you can bitch and moan. This is a mistrial... not the same thing.
 
I don't think I'd go that far, but I would guess that too many think that cops needing leeway and discretion means cops can do whatever in the execution of their duties, which is a poor excuse for blatantly violating someone's civil rights. But to the mistrial, I just don't understand what mitigating factors kept several jurors at 'not guilty'.

This. Sure, we do have some racist people down here, but I think that this is more a function of police-worship. The view of police as fallible human beings simply isn't there for a large portion of the population, whose view of law enforcement hasn't progressed beyond playing cops and robbers on the playground, "protecting our freedom", etc.

This is certainly a WTF moment for our state. Nobody that I personally know of can think of how this isn't a clear cut case of police brutality.
 
As I said already... it doesn't have to be an error by the prosecution. A hung jury will lead to a mistrial and it means the same thing. It is not a dismissal of the case.

When there is a hung jury the prosecution can retry the case in front of a different jury.

Sheesh... are people really this dense?

When the cop get his case dismissed... then you can bitch and moan. This is a mistrial... not the same thing.

Point taken, but the cynical among us (basically, anyone who has had to work with the Alabama court system) think that actions here speak louder than legal jargon. There is really no practical difference between acquitting the cop and a mistrial like we have here if the case isn't retried by the prosecution. If a new trial is scheduled, I will cede your point.
 
Back
Top