You're using a double standard here. Leaves everything at square one if you remove it. So there is the possibility your entire position on the case (Wilson Guilty) is due to cozy applications of double standards to suit your notions of what occurred.
This is generally what we are trying to move away from. The danger of what you are working with should be clear, we saw the riots and violence that sprung up as a result of the aftermath in the shooting death of Brown.
"Prevailing" as posited above, has in some cases been confused to a dangerous degree between "Guilty Wilson" and "Rigorous Honest Investigation to bring about the truth". I completely agree that trust deserves to be questioned given the balance of power in this situation, particularly in lieu of past police and investigative/DA/results behavior across the nation where justice has been sacrificed to serve agendas. There are still brutal facts to confront in order to prevail.