JEDIYoda
Lifer
- Jul 13, 2005
- 33,986
- 3,320
- 126
The cop did threaten to shoot him.....are you that dense??A word was deliberately left out to imply that the officer threatened to kill.
The cop did threaten to shoot him.....are you that dense??A word was deliberately left out to imply that the officer threatened to kill.
The question I think is how much does the autopsy corroborate his statements and is there any other evidence that backs up his statements.
......
The cop did threaten to shoot him.....are you that dense??
Looks like some commies from Chicago have come into town to stoke the flames.
The cops should not be able to use the phrase-- I was afraid for my life"....when they try to explain why the person they shot was unarmed and had their hands in the air....
I'm sure that you are much more intimate with those than I am.
...
The Justice Department, which ordered its own autopsy of Brown’s body, has reached conclusions similar to those reached in two other autopsies, people familiar with the findings said Tuesday. Those autopsies, by the county medical examiner and by a medical examiner brought in by the teen’s family, concluded that Brown was shot six times.
That is irony for you, you calling others racists. Oh how rich.
Speaking of indoctrinated trash, its you.
Or maybe what happened isn't what you really want to happen?
~snip~
Parcells was part of the Brown family's private autopsy team.
http://fox4kc.com/2014/08/19/shawn-...-michael-brown-autopsy-questioned-by-doctors/
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/...cle_0662e5b1-dcfa-578f-9487-8ab6a176ea4d.html
Yeah, that's it. We are slowly getting information showing that this thug got what he deserved. And it's slowly coming out that the looters think they "deserve" more.
The only racists here are the ones who scream "whitey killed our babies!" every fucking time this happens, everybody jumps the gun and blames the white(ish) guy, immediately, without looking at things objectively and waiting for the investigation to play out.
Look at the fucksticks in this thread "OMG, THIS GUY WAS A MODEL CITIZEN, THUG COP!" Now that narrative is slowly turning.
I have it on poor authority that Johnson may have recanted. Also, there may be well armed agitators participating tonight.
So who thinks hte cop is going to get a fair trial?
when you have the governor saying "a vigorous prosecution must now be pursued" in a video?
Does a recant mean he tells a different story or simply disavows he's existing account?
If true this is best case scenario.
hAHHAHAAAAA...NICE TRY.....now have somebody pinch you and wake you up...Yeah, that's it. We are slowly getting information showing that this thug got what he deserved. And it's slowly coming out that the looters think they "deserve" more.
The only racists here are the ones who scream "whitey killed our babies!" every fucking time this happens, everybody jumps the gun and blames the white(ish) guy, immediately, without looking at things objectively and waiting for the investigation to play out.
Look at the fucksticks in this thread "OMG, THIS GUY WAS A MODEL CITIZEN, THUG COP!" Now that narrative is slowly turning.
:thumbsup:Even if the shooting of Michael Brown was justified, the police completely bungled the immediate aftermath, from their escalation of hostilities in the days immediately following the shooting to the complete lack of information being released for several days. Whether or not Officer Wilson acted in good faith during the actual shooting does not excuse the actions of officers who arrested media members for no reason, who gassed protesters who were not hostile or who threatened to shoot members of the media in defiance of all common sense (I mean, seriously, YOU KNOW THEY ARE RECORDING YOU, DON'T THREATEN TO SHOOT THEM YOU MORON). Those actions speak to a police force that is wildly out of control and used to using threats of violence to achieve their means, which you should be opposed to no matter how you feel about Michael Brown, and those officers who employ those methods should be immediately removed from the force.
It's based on a single Facebook post.
Cops almost always get exonerated in these cases if any doubt whatsoever can be established, which I think is certainly possible in a case where witness testimony seems to be constantly changing. Granted, we don't have anywhere near the full story yet, so it's just wild speculation at this point, but I think it's a bit early to claim that there's no chance of a fair trial.
A Facebook scoop?
Now I've heard everything.
If news that big debuted on FB, I'll eat my hat...
