HumblePie
Lifer
- Oct 30, 2000
- 14,665
- 440
- 126
I'll just leave this little bit of quotations for larfs.
There is much more than that though in the last days of hypocrisy shown here. Eye witnesses backing up what he wants = all the evidence he needs. Eye witnesses stating something he doesn't like = Can't believe what those eye witnesses are saying.
Goes to great lengths to state that the robbery didn't happen. When confronted with undeniable evidence it did happen from every source out there, turtles up to state the robbery doesn't mean anything. When posters point out the state of mind a person is going to be in after using physical violence during a robbery, McShame Hurls insults and epitaphs about such info is bullshit to be used by other posters, isn't relevant to the case, or can't be used in court of law. Despite this actually is evidence that would be used in the case as the confrontation between Wilson and Brown was based specifically upon Brown's robbery and actions thereof.
Because the person was on their phone when the incident happened, did they hear the whole interaction? Is it at all possible for a bystander to misinterpret what they are seeing? The answer is yes.
Lol! Do you even read your own posts? "My scenario" is based on an eye witness account, all you have is your gut feeling of the "most likely" scenario. Sorry totes, that's not good enough for the courts.
I enjoyed the laughs and the dismissing of multiple witnesses with zero evidence to back up any claims.
There is much more than that though in the last days of hypocrisy shown here. Eye witnesses backing up what he wants = all the evidence he needs. Eye witnesses stating something he doesn't like = Can't believe what those eye witnesses are saying.
Goes to great lengths to state that the robbery didn't happen. When confronted with undeniable evidence it did happen from every source out there, turtles up to state the robbery doesn't mean anything. When posters point out the state of mind a person is going to be in after using physical violence during a robbery, McShame Hurls insults and epitaphs about such info is bullshit to be used by other posters, isn't relevant to the case, or can't be used in court of law. Despite this actually is evidence that would be used in the case as the confrontation between Wilson and Brown was based specifically upon Brown's robbery and actions thereof.
