LegendKiller
Lifer
- Mar 5, 2001
- 18,256
- 68
- 86
Exactly. If you don't pay, you don't have a right to drive the vehicle, so I have no problem with the lender simply disabling it until you do pay. It's kind of like putting one of those boots on a car for parking violations.
The idea of shutting the vehicle down while it's running is an incredibly stupid one. I'm amazed lenders would subject themselves to that kind of liability. Can you imagine the amount of money they'd be sued for if a vehicle got turned off while driving on the highway and plowed into other vehicles?? They'd get sued by the borrower (the driver), but they'd also get sued by every other vehicle on the road, not to mention criminal charges of reckless endangerment. Who in the world would authorize such a thing? Idiots.
Guess they'll learn their lesson soon enough, there's going to be some massive suit and they'll change the process in a hurry.
They don't. Sounds like the person wants some money.