• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mirror's Edge Catalyst Benchmarks Megathread

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
zlejedi said:
That's what we call reality - when reference clocked 980 matches Fury then overclocked one will be faster due to bigger overclocking headroom on maxwell cards.
Click to expand...
That is why AMD PR hates those review site or people who compare Maxwell OC with AMD cards. Maxwell with OC is on other level.
 
zlejedi said:
That's what we call reality - when reference clocked 980 matches Fury then overclocked one will be faster due to bigger overclocking headroom on maxwell cards.
Click to expand...

This is your direction change for the course of the thread on ME benchmarks? To take a game that actually offers parity and to say this?

zlejedi said:
Suprising how AMD barely matches non overclocked maxwell equivalents in Frostbite game.
Click to expand...

Tell me more about how surprising and amazing these results are to you. Which is it, the disappointment of the 390 only being a little faster than a 970 at 1080p? Aka the most typical result in the world? Or do you leave your mouth open in amazement because at 1440P where a stock reference 290 only beats the 970 by 5%?

These are perhaps the most expected results in the world in today's games, and would actually make ME:C AMD favored if we go by GM204 launch performance.

But do go on.

Please, tell me more. Spin this mediocre parity into praise for your favourite color.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top