Minn. Rep. Kerry Gauthier caught with zipper down... literally

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Democrat Kerry Gauthier admits to having ‘no strings attached’ sex with 17-year-old boy at rest stop, police say. Seems this is one issue with bipartisan support from our politicians...

Democratic leaders in Minnesota are demanding a state lawmaker withdraw from his re-election bid after police claim he admitted to having sex with a 17-year-old boy at a rest stop.
While Rep. Kerry Gauthier, 56, will lose support from fellow Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party members if he continues with his campaign, party leaders stopped short Monday of asking him to immediately resign.
The first-term legislator wasn’t charged in the alleged July 22 encounter because the legal age of consent in Minnesota is 16 and no money was exchanged, according to the St. Louis County attorney’s office. Police say the two had oral sex behind a rest stop pavilion in Duluth after the teen responded to Gauthier’s Craigslist ad looking for a “no strings attached” sex.
Police reports made public last week say Gauthier came clean about the rest stop rendezvous.


Trooper Scott Parker wrote in a report that he came across another man — later identified as Gauthier — behind a rest area building, the Duluth News Tribune reported.
“It was at that time I noted his zipper was open and part of his shirt was hanging out. I asked him why his zipper was down and he said he didn’t know,” Parker wrote. “I told him to zip it up and leave. The male seemed nervous.”
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...boy-rest-stop-article-1.1140833#ixzz24KpEd3ue
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
16 is the age of consent. No laws were broken. I see no mention of him being married.

What exactly is the problem?
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,010
9,440
146
16 is the age of consent. No laws were broken. I see no mention of him being married.

What exactly is the problem?

Legal or not a 56 year old man having public sex with a 17 year old, I don't care the gender, is not behavior you want from people who hold public office... Or any where.

Personally I find it morally reprehensible and I absolutely think he should disappear from politics.
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
Legal or not a 56 year old man having public sex with a 17 year old, I don't care the gender, is not behavior you want from people who hold public office... Or any where.

Personally I find it morally reprehensible and I absolutely think he should disappear from politics.

It isn't your place to push your morals upon 2 legal and consenting parties.

It also isn't your place to say what completely legal behavior is or is not allowable in politics. There is no reason that this prevents him from doing his job properly.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,010
9,440
146
It isn't your place to push your morals upon 2 legal and consenting parties.

It also isn't your place to say what completely legal behavior is or is not allowable in politics. There is no reason that this prevents him from doing his job properly.

Maybe I should have qualified it as my own personal opinion... Oh wait...
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Hmm... seems no laws were broken so I'm not sure why I should care what this guy does with his genitals... not something I would run a platform on though...
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,540
1,106
126
Its only bipartisan when a democrat is involved.

Not so much when a republican gets busted.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
51,943
44,805
136
Its only bipartisan when a democrat is involved.

Not so much when a republican gets busted.

When Republicans get busted their embarrassment is self imposed since it's usually the social conservative types.

Either way this story is a big yawn since both parties were of age and the encounter appears to have been consensual.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
The dems of his state disagree with you WhipperSnapper. You would be correct as a whole, though. Republicans say they have upright morals and are rightfully blasted for violating them. Dems say they do not have upright morals and therefor when found to be doing things such as having sex in public, it is far harder to blast them for it - they never claimed they would do the right thing. :)
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,836
2,620
136
There are lots of things that are legal that are usually the kiss of death for a political career. I would say this is one of those situations. But as he is a state legislator and not in my state (much less my district) this has about as much significance to me as last night's Met's score.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
51,943
44,805
136
The dems of his state disagree with you K1052.

Minnesota isn't generally known for being a bastion of sexual freedom.

In general this country is WAY to uptight about sex. Even entirely legal consensual sex.

The public sex charge is pretty marginal at best, up there with jaywalking or public intox. However it's an election year so he'll get thrown to the dogs.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,813
4,339
136
There are lots of things that are legal that are usually the kiss of death for a political career. I would say this is one of those situations. But as he is a state legislator and not in my state (much less my district) this has about as much significance to me as last night's Met's score.

This.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,457
6,689
126
I can see this in two ways. On the one hand, sex between two consenting adults or the right to believe that women can't get pregnant from a rape are not illegal, and while, not as many people would be uptight about, oh, say a 40 year old single man and a 40 year old single woman having consensual sex, though a breach of Biblical law, a lot more are disgusted by same sex with such a disparity of age or the fact that such a knuckle of dragging view of rape could be a part of political rhetoric.

Thus, while there is nothing about the sex act or the rape view that should legally bar a person from a race, they do speak to a person's character and judgment. In a world where so many people hold their sexual views as Biblically absolute or scientifically defined as fact, and will come down hard on the 'sinner' or the 'ignorant', it doesn't speak well of your judgment, in my opinion, to demonstrate the a contempt for the imputed probity each type holds for each example.

In a world in transition from the certainty of ancient religious anti-homosexual bigotry that homosexuality is evil, to the growing contempt replacing ingrained misogyny, also of religious origin, it isn't really political sensible, not good judgment, to show a disdain for the views of any of the sides. The idea in politics is to win votes, as many as you can, and if you aren't sufficiently intelligent or sufficiently restrained in your behavior to reflect some basic sensibility to what it takes to get elected, you probably have insufficient sense to know the kinds of votes the folk you represent and your party nationally would want and expect of you. You would probably not, in short, be a very good representative.

What I find interesting about this is the fact that while the view of the Republican is profoundly disgusting and dangerous to rape victims and women because it goes hand in hand with the Republican desire to throw out Roe v. Wade and which the House Republicans have made a number of attempts to enact, I can understand and sympathize and even forgive this insanity because I know the people who think this way are brain defective through no fault of their own. Not to say I wouldn't try to stop this from becoming law by the choices I make with voting or expressing my political opinion, but I can find no such compassion for a person of 56 having sex with somebody 17 regardless of gender. It simply feels like predation to me.
 
Last edited:

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
"Gauthier took office last year representing the Duluth area in the Minnesota House of Representatives."

Anyone outside MN giving a rat's ass about this: hilarious.