I second this notion. Especially with the post-processing features that are a good idea to turn on, I would think you'd want something at least twice as fast.Originally posted by: SickBeast
I would be very surprised to see a Celeron 400 play a DivX file flawlessly. That CPU barely meets the minimum spec to play DVD. Does the DivX website not post a minimum system requirement?
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Sorry to hijack but do any of you know where I can get the codecs without spyware?
Originally posted by: ViRGE
I second this notion. Especially with the post-processing features that are a good idea to turn on, I would think you'd want something at least twice as fast.Originally posted by: SickBeast
I would be very surprised to see a Celeron 400 play a DivX file flawlessly. That CPU barely meets the minimum spec to play DVD. Does the DivX website not post a minimum system requirement?
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
the divx spyware isn't so bad for what your getting.
Originally posted by: Gurck
The spyware-laden free version allows for decoding (viewing) only and doesn't sport these advanced features.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
no kidding. and the decoding quality/divx settings etc matter too. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/content_provider/film/ContentShowcase.aspx
high res divx basically. coral reef at the higher res rapes my 2.4ghz xp