- Jul 3, 2001
- 10,784
- 6
- 81
nah, it'll shoot up about another ~$70-$100 before the auction is over.Originally posted by: Glitchny
since the 9800pro is about half what it normally costs you shouldnt complain about the shipping, you are still saving money
Agreed.Originally posted by: slag
I dont see why you are bitching.
If you dont like the price, dont bid on it!!!!
Its as simple as that..
b/c I sell stuff/ buy stuff in the FS/FT forums here and don't rip people on shipping.Originally posted by: slag
I dont see ..
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
Anytime I do auctions on eBay, here, or where ever, I always do free shipping. Try to keep people from getting shizited on like this.
Originally posted by: Spencer278
I think that ebay should require shipping to be included or they have to charge only actual postages. The shipping game is just an pain in the ass and makes ebay suck even more then it normally does. If you do win the action you should give the person a nagitive for charging excessive shiping.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Spencer278
I think that ebay should require shipping to be included or they have to charge only actual postages. The shipping game is just an pain in the ass and makes ebay suck even more then it normally does. If you do win the action you should give the person a nagitive for charging excessive shiping.
No, you shouldn't bid on the damn auction. No one is pointing a gun to your head. Read my post a few up to understand what is going on.
First of all, in the auction posted in the original post, the S&H terms are right there in the auction. I found them w/o much hassle.Originally posted by: Spencer278
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Spencer278
I think that ebay should require shipping to be included or they have to charge only actual postages. The shipping game is just an pain in the ass and makes ebay suck even more then it normally does. If you do win the action you should give the person a nagitive for charging excessive shiping.
No, you shouldn't bid on the damn auction. No one is pointing a gun to your head. Read my post a few up to understand what is going on.
Explain how 40 dollar shiping and handle shouldn't get a negitive when the seller doesn't even included the price of shipping and handleing in the box for shipping and handling. The seller is try to screw a buy that didn't read his 5 page auction. And like I said it is pain when you have to search for all the auction to see who isn't a scumb bag.
Yes I know seller like to rip people off you don't need to point that out.
Originally posted by: ness1469
The only thing I find stupid about this auction is that they way he claims to get the price from shipping...
**S&H is Not just postage. It includes the time, effort,gas,labor & material associate with the preparation and arrangement of shipment.**
He can charge whatever he wants for it, that's not my gripe, but saying that it costs a totall of 40 dollars for things like packaging, gas, the actual postage and shipping... then he says "EFFORT" and "LABOR".... I have many problems with that... first off... if he's selling something on ebay for an attempted profit, effort is not something a buyer should pay for. That's just FVCKING LAZY sounding.
Secondly... unless he has to drive all the way across the state to find a post office, claiming gas as one of the reasons for increased shipping rates is ridiculous, even if it IS true... just saying it would make me not bid on his item.
Then again some stupid computer nerd who thinks that 300 dollars is a good deal for a stupid-ass video card deserves to be ripped off.
edit: Oh, and Spencer, hush before you make yourself look like a bigger fool.
I understand what you are trying to Illustrate I guess. Though, using a totally hypothetical situation in which all of your "situations" add up perfectly does not really support anything. Except that you can make up a hypothetical sitaution to prove anything you want correct.What are you talking about?? I don't see the logic people have in "looking down" on this process.
Let's say you have three Radeon 9800 Pros for sale. All three start off at $9.95 with No Reserve.
- One has shipping costs of $9.00 + $2.00 insurance (required).
- One has a shipping cost of $30.00 + $10.00 insurance (required).
- One has free shipping and insurance.
eBay is pretty good at determining the market value of items. Let's say (and I'm just thinking off the top of my head here) that the average going rate for a 9800 Pro is $300 shipped. Given the nature of eBay, the ending auction value prices for the items would be very close to this:
Situation #1: ~ $289
Situation #2: ~ $260
Situation #3: ~ $300
Regardless of the final auction value price, you still have to pay shipping/insurance which would put all three auctions at right ~$300 for the buyer.
The ONLY thing different in each case is the amount of money that the SELLER pays to eBay. In this case, the seller in situation #2 would pay less eBay fees. The buyer isn't at all affected.
So again, I don't see the point be raised here by the original poster.
The fact of the matter is, those situations are about 99% indicitivate of what will happen in the eBay market.I understand what you are trying to Illustrate I guess. Though, using a totally hypothetical situation in which all of your "situations" add up perfectly does not really support anything. Except that you can make up a hypothetical sitaution to prove anything you want correct.
I don't see anything wrong with the practice, as long as everything is stated clearly, which in most cases they are.
It does seem like more of a lewd business practice. If their base auction price gets bid up to market value, than that shipping and handling cost is pure profit.
They are preying on people. Many businesses do the same thing, it's legal, but bad business.
It can be said that the people who do get taken advantage of deserved because they are stupid, or potentially bad at math(which drives the lottery market). Which is true, but it still doesn't make it any more correct or credible. It's an attempt at extra profit, and no amount of babble about self adjusting market conditions is going to change that.